The Strength of Mixed Research Methods for the Assessment of Learning Communities

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrade

(2007-2008). Learning communities: Examining positive outcomes. Journal of College Student Retention, 9(1), 1–20.

Baker

, & Pomerantz

(2000/2001). Impact of learning communities on retention at a metropolitan university. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 2, 115–126.

Crissman

J. L.

(2001). Clustered and nonclustered first-year seminars: New students’ first-semester experiences. Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 13(1), 69–88.

Green

J.C.

, Caracelli

V. J.

, & Graham

W. F.

(1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255–274.

Guba

E. G.

(1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In Guba

E. G.

(Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17–27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hotchkiss

, Moore

, & Pitts

(2006). Freshman learning communities, college performance, and retention. Education Economics, 14(2), 197–210.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

, & Leech

N. L.

(2004). Enhancing the interpretation of “significant findings”: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770–792.

Pike

G. R.

(2008, November-December). Learning about learning communities: Consider the variables. About Campus, 13(5), 30–32.

Sieber

S. D.

(1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 13, 1335–1359.

10.

Soldner

, Lee

, & Duby

(1999/2000). Welcome to the block: Developing freshman learning communities that work. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 1, 115–129.