Speaking with them or speaking for them: A conversation about the effect of stereotypes in the Latina/Hispanic women's experiences in the United States
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2013
Speaking with them or speaking for them: A conversation about the effect of stereotypes in the Latina/Hispanic women's experiences in the United States
Hispanics represent one of the fastest growing segments of the U.S. population. Recent census reports estimate that Hispanics comprise 16 percent of the U.S. population. By 2050, it is estimated that nearly one out of every three Americans will be Hispanic. Many researchers have begun earnestly studying their impact on U.S. economy, culture, education, business, and politics. But few studies have focused on Hispanic females and their quiet struggles for self–determination in the United States. This essay explores the experiences of Hispanic women in the U.S. workforce by giving voice to this silent minority.
BartoloméL., & MacedoD. (1997). Dancing with bigotry: The poisoning of racial ethnic identities. Harvard Educational Review, 67(2), 222–246.
2.
BeltranM. (2002). The Hollywood Latina body as site of social struggle: Media constructions of stardom and Jennifer Lopez's ‘Crossover butt.’Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 19, 71–86.
3.
Catalyst. (2005). Women “Take Care,” Men “Take Charge:” Stereotyping of U.S. Business Leaders Exposed.New York, NY: Catalyst Publication.
4.
ChavezL. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.
5.
CocchiaraF., BellM.P., & BerryD.P. (2006). Latinas and Black women: key factors for a growing proportion of the U.S. workforce, Equal Opportunities International, 25 (4), 272–284.
6.
CoferJ., (1995). The myth of the Latin woman: I just met a girl named Maria. In RothenbergP.S. (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (pp. 203–207) (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martins Press.
7.
CollinsH.P. (2000). Black feminism thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
FinewoodM. (2005). “They are talking our jobs: Representationsof Latino immigrants in the Carolines” (Bachelor Thesis of North Caroline State University, 2005). Retrieved from: http://www.cas.sc.edu/ANTH/ThesesPDF/Finewood/Finewood.pdf
9.
GlennE. (2002). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American citizenship labor. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
HurtadoA. (2005). Multiple subjectivities: Chicanas and cultural citizenship. In FriedmanM. (Ed), Women and Citizenship, (pp. 11–129). Oxford, NY: Oxford University press.
12.
KarjanenD. (2008). Gender, Race, and Nationality in the Making of Mexican Migrant Labor in the United States. Latin American Perspectives, 35(1), 51–63.
13.
KirschenmanJ., & NeckermanK. (1991).We'd love to hire them but …: The meaning of race for employers. In JencksC., & PetersonP. (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 110–132). Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions.
14.
MonoghanC. (2010). Working against the grain: White privilege in HRD. New directions for adults and continuing education, 125(205), 53–63.
15.
NeilsenJ. (1990). Introduction. In Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 1–37). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16.
RomeroM., Hondagneu–SoteloP., & OrtizV. (1997). Challenging fronteras: Structuring Latina and Latino lives in the U.S. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
TorresM. (2004). To the margin and back: the high cost of being Latina in “America.”Journal of Latinos & Education, 3(2), 123–141.
18.
United States Census Bureau. (2011). The Hispanic population:2010. Retrieved: http://www.census.gov/
19.
VillenasS., & DeyhleD. (1999). Critical Race Theory and Ethnographies Challenging the Stereotypes: Latino Families, Schooling, Resilience and Resistance. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 413–445.
20.
ZamudioM., & LichterM. (2008), Bad attitudes and good soldiers: Soft skills as a code for tractability in the hiring of immigrant Latina/os over Native Blacks in the hotel industry. Social Problems, 55(4), 573–589.
