Teaching and Learning Styles of Community College Business Instructors and Their Students: Relationship to Student Performance and Instructor Evaluations
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2003
Teaching and Learning Styles of Community College Business Instructors and Their Students: Relationship to Student Performance and Instructor Evaluations
This study was designed to determine whether a match between instructors' teaching styles and students' learning styles would foster student success as evidenced by higher course grades and final exam scores. Further, student evaluations of instructors were examined to determine whether a match between instructors' teaching styles and students' learning styles would yield more positive evaluations of instructor effectiveness. Study participants included five business instructors and 99 students from two community colleges. There was no significant relationship between learning style/teaching style match and student success as indicated by course grades, final exam scores, and evaluations of instructors. A significant relationship existed, however, between course grades, final exam scores, instructor evaluations, and GPA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonW. R.BruceS. W. (1979). A plan for matching learning and teaching styles. In KiernanO. B. (Ed.), Student Learning Styles. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
2.
BattleC. (1982). A pilot study of learning instructional styles as a predictor of educational outcomes in Principles of Accounting I at Broward Community College. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University.
3.
CampbellB. W. (1989). A study of the relationship between teachers' and students' learning styles and students' achievement in business communications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign.
4.
CanfieldA. A. (1977). Learning Styles Inventory. Plymouth, MI: Humanics, Inc.
5.
CanfieldA. A. (1992). Canfield Learning Styles Inventory manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
6.
CanfieldA. A.CanfieldJ. S. (1988). Canfield Instructional Styles Inventory (ISI) Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
7.
CartheyJ. H. (1993). Relationships between learning styles and academic achievement and brain hemispheric dominance and academic performance in business and accounting courses. Unpublished master's thesis, Winona State University, Minnesota.
8.
CharkinsR. J.O'TooleD. M.WetzelJ. N. (1985). Linking teacher and student learning styles with student achievement and attitudes. The Journal of Economic Education, 16(2), 111–120.
9.
CrossK. P. (1976). Accent on learning: Improving instruction and reshaping the curriculum. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
10.
DebsM. B.BrillhartL. V. (1981). Engineering composition at the community college. Teaching English in the Two‐Year College; v8 n1 p57–60 Fall 1981.
11.
DominoG. (1971). Interactive effects achievement orientation and teaching style on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(5), 427–431.
12.
DunnR.BeaudryJ. S.KlavasA. (1989). Survey of research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 50–58.
13.
FriedmanP.AlleyR. (1984). Learning/teaching styles: Applying the principles. Theory Into Practice, 23(1), 77–81.
14.
GregorcA. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Their nature and effects. In KeefeJ. W. (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. 19–26. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
15.
HensonK. T.BorthwickP. (1984). Matching styles: A historical look. Theory Into Practice, 23(1), 3–9.
16.
HunterW. E. (1979). Relationships between learning styles, grades, and student rating of instruction. Columbia: Department of Higher and Adult Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED181974).
17.
HymanR.RosoffB. (1985). Matching learning styles and teaching styles. The Education Digest, 50(6), 41–43.
18.
KaplanE. J.KiesD. A. (1993). Together: Teaching styles and learning styles improving college instruction. College Student Journal, 27(4), 509–13.
19.
LyonJ. A. (1991). Relationships among teaching style, learning styles, and adult learning in a microcomputer word processing course. Unpublished master's thesis, Washington State University.
20.
MarshallC. (1991). Teachers' learning styles: How they affect student learning. The Clearing House, 64(4), 225–227.
21.
MatthewsD. B. (1995). An investigation of the learning styles of students at selected postsecondary and secondary institutions in South Carolina. Research Bulletin, 60, 1–151.
22.
MigliettiC. L. (1994). The relationship of teaching styles, expectations of classroom environments, and learning styles of adult students at a two‐year college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Ohio.
23.
MillerS. L. (1990). Effects of matching learning styles of students and instructors on students' perceptions of effective teaching behaviors in the clinical setting. Unpublished master's thesis, Bellarmine College, Louisville, KY.
24.
RainesR. H. (1978). A comparative analysis of learning styles and teaching styles of mathematics students and instructors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
25.
ScerbaJ. R. (1979,April). Compatibility of teaching strategies and learning styles as a determinant of academic success. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed171752).
26.
SullivanM. H. (1993). A meta‐analysis of experimental research studies based on the Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model and its relationship to academic achievement and performance. (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54–08A.
27.
VanVurenS. K. (1992). The effect of matching learning style and instruction with academic achievement of students receiving an interactive learning experience in chemistry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University.
28.
ZinnL. M. (1990). Identifying your philosophical orientation. In GalraithM. (Ed.) Adult learning methods, (pp. 39–77). Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
29.
ZippertC. P. (1985). The effectiveness of adjusting teaching strategies to assessed learning styles of adult students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.
