The purpose of this study was to identify changes in graduate HRD curricular content in U.S. institutions since Kuchinke's study in 2002. Additionally, the importance of each curricular content area from these graduate HRD programs was assessed by the faculty members, graduate students, and practitioners in the HRD field. Through a pilot study and web search of 405 U.S. institutions, 68 content areas were identified. Using an online survey, the ratings and ranking of important content areas, as perceived by the members of a professional association of HRD, were assessed. Conclusions and implications for graduate HRD curriculum modification and development were discussed.
American Society for Training and Development. (1996). Academic directory: Programs in human resource development 1997. Alexandria, Virginia: American Society for Training and Development.
2.
BieremaL. L. & ErautM. (2004). Workplace–focused learning: Perspective on continuing professional education and human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 52–68.
3.
BowmanJ. S. (2007). Invited reaction: Protecting the birds’ feathers – keeping ideology out of MBA and HRD programs. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 132–35.
4.
CookC., HeathF. & ThompsonR. (2000). A meta–analysis of response rates in web – or internet–based surveys. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
5.
CsehM., KrisztianB. & ZsoltM. (2006). The development of HRD in Hungarian higher education. Proceedings of the 2006 Academy of Human Resource Development Conference. Academy of Human Resource Development. Columbus, OH.
6.
DareD. E. & LeachJ. A. (1999). Preparing tomorrow's HRD professional: Perceived relevance of the 1989 competency model. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 15, 5–18.
7.
DrryS. J., & FischerG. (2005). Toward a model and theory for transdisciplinary graduate education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Symposium on Sociotechnical Design for Lifelong Learning: A crucial role for graduate education, Montreal, Canada.
8.
FrankC., & YeagerK. (2011). Getting into shape: Strengthening the academic foundations of HRD graduate programs for an uncertain global economy. In DiraniK. & WangJ. (Eds.), Academy of Human Resource Development 2011 Proceedings (pp. 3373–3380). Schaumberg, IL: Academy of HRD.
9.
FulkertR. F. (1997). Competencies required to be a trainer: A Delphi study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58–04A.
10.
GaudetC., & VincentA. (1993). Characteristics of training and human resource development degree programs in the United States. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 35, 138–160.
11.
MayG. L. (2007). Invited reaction: Birds of feather? HRD and business schools should flock together. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 127–131.
12.
MagerR. F. (1996, June). Morphing into a 21st century trainer. Training, 33, 65–74.
13.
McGoldrickJ., StewartJ., & WatsonS. (2001). Theorizing human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 4, 343–356.
14.
McLaganP. A. (Ed.) (1983). Models for excellence: The conclusions and recommendations of the ASTD training and development competency study. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Training.
15.
McLeaneG. N. (1998). HRD: A three–legged stool, an octopus, or a centipede?Human Resource Development International, 1, 375–377.
16.
McLeanG. N., & McLeanL. D. (2001). If we can't define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context?Human Resource Development International, 4, 313–326.
17.
ReddickK. A. H. (1997). A study of competencies and requirements of master's degree programs in human resource training and development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ.
18.
RobertsP. B. (Ed.). (2008). Human resource development directory of academic programs in the United States. Tyler, TX: The University of Texas at Tyler.
19.
RobertsP. B. (Ed.). (2009). Human resource development directory of academic programs in the United States. Tyler, TX: The University of Texas at Tyler.
20.
RobertsP. B. (Ed.). (2010). Human resource development directory of academic programs in the United States. Tyler, TX: The University of Texas at Tyler.
21.
RothG. (2004). CPE and HRD: Research and practice within systems and across boundaries. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 9–19.
22.
RothwellW. J., & CooksonP. S. (1997). Beyond instruction: Comprehensive program planning for business and education. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
23.
RuonaW.E.A. (2000). Core beliefs in human resource development: A journey for the profession and its professionals. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2, 1–27.
24.
RuonaW.E.A. & RusawC.A. (2001).The role of codes of ethics in the future of human resource development, in the 2001. Academy of Human Resource Development Conference Proceeding. Academy of Human Resource Development, Tulsa, OK
25.
SleezerC.M., ContiG.J. & NolanR.E. (2004). Comparing CPE and HRD programs: Definitions, theoretical foundations, outcomes, and measures of quality. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 20–34.
26.
SwansonR. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory. Human Resource Development International, 4, 299–312.
27.
SwansonR.A. & HoltonE.F.III. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler.
28.
WatkinsK.E. (1991). Essay review: Many voices: Defining human resource development from different disciplines. Adult Education Quarterly, 41, 241–255.
29.
YoonS.W., & LimD.H. (2010). Systemizing virtual learning and technologies by managing organizational competency and talents. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 715–727.
