Strengths,Opportunities,Aspirations,and Results: An Emerging Approach to Organization Development

Abstract

Organization development (OD) interventions have typically relied on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) framework for strategic planning. The strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results (SOAR) framework is a relatively new innovation in OD that may serve as a viable alternative to SWOT for those who wish to apply an appreciative inquiry approach. This paper presents the results of a scoping study in which the limited but varied literature support for SOAR is reviewed. An extensive search uncovered 27 publications pertaining to SOAR, which were then analyzed chronologically and thematically. Although findings include an overwhelmingly positive appraisal of SOAR, many gaps were uncovered in the literature and research regarding empirical support for the framework.

Keywords

SOAR organization development strategic planning appreciative inquiry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Practitioner

. (2015, September 1). Appreciative Inquiry AI Practitioner Homepage. Retrieved from http://www.aipractitioner.com

Arksey

, & O'Malley

(2007). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 18–32.

Braveman

, Baize

, Malacara

, Morris

, Munoz

, Scheetz

L.J

., & Wright

(2011). Strategic visioning and planning: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Rehabilitation Services experience. Administration & Management Special Interest Section Quarterly, 27(4), 1–4.

Bright

D. S.

, & Miller

M. T.

(2013). Appreciative inquiry and positive organizational scholarship: A philosophy of practice for turbulent times. In Vogelsang

, Townsend

, Minahan

, Jamieson

, Vogel

, Viets

, Royal

, & Valek

(Eds.), Handbook for strategic HR: Best practices in organization development from the OD network (pp. 320–344). New York, NY: Amacon.

Casey

A. M.

(2015). Grassroots strategic planning: Involving library staff from the beginning. Journal of Library Administration, 55(4), 329–340.

Cooperrider

D. L.

(1986). Appreciative inquiry: Toward a methodology for understanding and enhancing organizational intervention (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University Microfilms International. (UMI No. 8611485).

Cooperrider

D.L.

& Sekerka

L. E.

(2003). Elevation of inquiry into the appreciable world: Toward a theory of positive organizational change. In Cameron

, Dutton

, & Quinn

(Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 225–240). San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler.

Cooperrider

D. L.

, & Srivastva

(1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In Pasmore

, & Woodman

(Eds.), Research in organization change and development (pp. 129–169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Cooperrider

D. L.

& Whitney

(1999). Collaborating for change: Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehlere Communications.

10.

Cooperrider

D. L.

, Whitney

D. K.

, & Stavros

J. M.

(2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change (2nd ed.). Brunswick, OH: Crown Custom Publishing, Inc.

11.

Cox

J. D.

(2014). An evaluation of the relationship among emotional intelligence, SOAR, and collaboration: Implications for teams. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3624970).

12.

Creswell

(2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed design. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

13.

Crusoe

(2012). Virtual SOARing in a School of Nursing: Creating Space for Emergent Design. AI Practitioner, 14(1), 27–32.

14.

Davis

, Drey

, & Gould

(2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(10), 1386–1400.

15.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, 91(July–August), 330–335.

16.

Garrard

(2004). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

17.

Gauthier

& Stephenson

(2010, November 29). Employee engagement: It's all in your head. Ottawa Business Journal, p. 20.

18.

Glenn

L. A.

, Saretsky

, & Stetson

N. E.

(2014). The Long Term Impact of Appreciative Inquiry at Colleges and Universities. AI Practitioner, 16(2), 1–8.

19.

Glovis

M. J.

(2012). A mixed methods study in the expression of flow, SOAR, and motivation: Developing individual transcendence within the delivery of complex systems integration projects (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3502336).

20.

Glovis

M. J.

, Cole

M. L.

, & Stavros

J. M.

(2014). SOAR and motivation as mediators of the relationship between flow and project success. Organization Development Journal, 32(3), 57–73.

21.

Grant

M. J.

, & Booth

(2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.

22.

Grant

& Humphries

(2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: Bridging an apparent paradox. Action Research, 4(4), 401–418.

23.

Hinrichs

(2010). SOARing for Sustainability: Longitudinal Organizational Efforts Applying Appreciative Inquiry. AI Practitioner, 12(3), 31–36.

24.

Hill

, & Westbrook

(1997). SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46–52.

25.

Hitchcock

J. A.

(2014). An Exploration of Organizational Collective Motivation and the Influence of the SOAR Framework to Build Organizational Collective Motivation. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3682915)

26.

Khavarian–Garmsir

, & Zare

S. M.

(2015). SOAR framework as a new model for the strategic planning of sustainable tourism. Tourism Planning & Development, 12(3), 321–332.

27.

Kuhn

T. S.

(2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Lincoln

Y. S.

, & Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

29.

Malone

P. R.

(2010). An Appreciative Exploration of Strategic Capacity and the Impact of the SOAR Framework in Building Strategic Capacity. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3397581)

30.

McKenna

, Daykin

, Mohr

B. J.

, & Silbert

(2007). Strategic Planning with Appreciative Inquiry: Unleashing the Positive Potential to SOAR. Retrieved from https://maureenmckenna.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/ipi–article–on–soar–and–strategic–planning.pdf

31.

McLean

G. N.

(2006). Organization development: Principles, processes, performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler.

32.

Peaslee

(2014). Creating and sustaining an appreciative culture in a community college from 2006 to 2014. AI Practitioner, 16(2), 78–84.

33.

Rath

(2007). Strengthsfinder. New York, NY: Gallup Press.

34.

Saretsky

K. L.

(2013). Appreciative inquiry for strategic planning: An evaluative and exploratory case study of two colleges (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (ID No. 1473918370).

35.

Seligman

M. E. P.

, & Csikszentmihalyi

(2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

36.

Sprangel

J. R.

(2009). A study of the direct and mediational effects of the SOAR(TM) framework, trust, and environmental management systems on chemical management services supplier performance at haas TCM group (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3369505).

37.

Sprangel

, Stavros

, & Cole

(2011). Creating sustainable relationships using the strengths, opportunities, aspirations and results framework, trust, and environmentalism: A research–based case study. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(1), 39–57.

38.

Stavros

J. M.

(2013). The Generative Nature of SOAR: Applications, Results and the New SOAR Profile. AI Practitioner, 15(3), 7–30.

39.

Stavros

J. M.

, & Cole

M. L.

(2013). SOARing towards positive transformation and change. The ABAC ODI Vision. Action. Outcome, 1(1), 10–34.

40.

Stavros

J. M.

, Cole

M. L.

, & Hitchcock

(2014). A Research Review of SOAR. AI Practitioner, 16(3), 75–80.

41.

Stavros

, Cooperrider

, & Kelley

D. L.

(2003). Strategic inquiry, appreciative intent: Inspiration to SOAR. Retrieved August 1, 2015, from https://design.umn.edu/about/intranet/documents/Strategic_Inquiry_Appreciative_Intent.pdf

42.

Stavros

J. M.

, Cooperrider

, & Kelley

(2007). SOAR: A new approach to strategic planning. In Homan

, Devane

, & Cady

(Eds.), The Change Handbook: The Definitive Resource on Today's Best Methods for Engaging Whole Systems (2nd ed., pp. 375–380). San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler Publishers, Inc.

43.

Stavros

J. M.

, & Hinrichs

(2007). SOARing to High and Engaging Performance: An Appreciative Approach to Strategy. AI Practitioner, 1(1), 1–9.

44.

Stavros

J. M.

, & Hinrichs

(2009). Thin book of SOAR: Building strengths based strategy. Bend, OR: Thin Book Publishing.

45.

Swafford

S. W.

(2013). Applied experiences of the SOAR framework by association management and foundation executives (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3568682).

46.

Swanson

R. A.

, & Holton

E. F.

(2009). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler Publishers, Inc.