The Country'S Crime Rate Moderates the Relation between Authoritarian Predispositions and the Manifestations of Authoritarianism: A Multilevel,Multinational Study

Abstract

We performed a multilevel, multinational test of Stenner's model on authoritarianism using the 2008 European Values Survey dataset (N = 55 199, nested in 38 nations). We focussed on the effects exerted on four authoritarian manifestations (racial intolerance, political intolerance, negative attitudes towards immigrants, and moral intolerance) by the cross–level interaction between participants’ authoritarian predispositions (assessed in terms of childrearing values) and their country's crime rate. Associations between authoritarian predispositions and racial intolerance, political intolerance, negative attitudes towards immigrants, and moral intolerance were significantly stronger among participants living in countries characterised by high crime rates than those among participants living in countries with low crime rates. Limitations, implications, and future directions of this study are discussed. Copyright © 2013 European Association of Personality Psychology.

Keywords

authoritarianism intolerance threat moderation multilevel analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T. W.

, Frenkel–Brunswik

, Levinson

D. J.

, & Sanford

R. N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barbagli

(2008). Immigrazione e sicurezza in Italia [Immigration and security in Italy]. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Cates

J. A.

, Dian

D. A.

, & Schnepf

G. W.

(2003). Use of protection motivation theory to assess fear of crime in rural areas. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 225–236. doi: 10.1080/1068316021000072184

Cohrs

J. C.

, & Asbrock

(2009). Right–wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270–289. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.545

Cohrs

J. C.

, & Ibler

(2009). Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 81–94. doi:10.1080/01973530802659638

Dallago

, Mirisola

, & Roccato

(2011). Personalità, minaccia terroristica e autoritarismo di destra [Personality, terrorist threat, and right–wing authoritarianism]. Psicologia Sociale, 6, 103–118.

Dallago

, Mirisola

, & Roccato

(2012). Predicting right–wing authoritarianism via personality and dangerous world beliefs: Direct, indirect, and interactive effects. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 112–127. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.565384

Dallago

, & Roccato

(2010). Right–wing authoritarianism, Big Five, and perceived threat to safety. European Journal of Personality, 24, 106–122. doi:10.1002/per.745

10.

Darling

, & Steinberg

(1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487–496.

11.

Doise

(1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Doty

R. M.

, Peterson

B. E.

, & Winter

D. G.

(1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States 1978–1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629–640. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.61.4.629

13.

Duckitt

(1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63–84.

14.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual–process cognitive–motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

15.

Duckitt

, & Fisher

(2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–222.

16.

Duckitt

, & Sibley

C. G.

(2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual–process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00672.x

17.

Duckitt

, Wagner

, du Plessis

, & Birum

(2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93. doi: 10.1037//0022–3514.83.1.75

18.

Duncan

L. E.

, Peterson

B. E.

, & Zurbriggen

E. L.

(2010). Personality and politics: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Personality, 78, 1595–1600. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00663.x

19.

Duriez

, Klimstra

T. A.

, Luyckx

, Beyers

, & Soenens

(2012). Right–wing authoritarianism: Protective factor against or risk factor for depression? European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 536–549. doi: 10.1002/per.853

20.

Enders

C. K.

, & Tofigi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross–sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.

21.

Feldman

(2001). Authoritarianism. In Smelser

N. J.

, & Baltes

P. B.

(Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (p. 971). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

22.

Feldman

, & Stenner

(1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770.

23.

Fischer

, Fischer

, Frey

, Such

, Smyth

, Tester

, & Kastenmüller

(2010). Causal evidence that terrorism salience increases authoritarian parenting practices. Social Psychology, 41, 246–254. doi: 10.1027/1864–9335/a000033

24.

Fritsche

, Jonas

, & Kessler

(2011). Collective reactions to threat: Implications for intergroup conflict and solving societal crises. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 101–136.

25.

Fromm

(1941). Escape from freedom. New York, NY: Avon Books.

26.

Funder

D. C.

(1982). On assessing social psychological theories through the study of individual differences: Template matching and forced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 100–110.

27.

Greenberg

, Pyszczynski

, Solomon

, Rosenblatt

, Veeder

, Kirkland

, & Lyon

(1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.58.2.308

28.

Hetherington

M. J.

, & Suhay

(2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 546–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–5907.2011.00514.x

29.

Hofman

D.A.

, & Gavin

M.B.

(1998). Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.

30.

Huddy

, Feldman

, Taber

, & Lahav

(2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608.

31.

Inglehart

(1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.

32.

Jost

J. T.

, Glaser

, Kruglanski

A. W.

, & Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

33.

Kiecolt

K. J.

, & Nathan

L. E.

(1985). Secondary analysis of survey data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage University Paper.

34.

Lavine

, Lodge

, Polichak

, & Taber

(2002). Explicating the black box through experimentations: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10, 343–361.

35.

Lewin

(1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.

36.

Martin

J. G.

(1964). The tolerant personality. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

37.

Meloen

(1993). The F scale as a predictor of fascism: An overview of 40 years of authoritarianism research. In Stone

W. F.

, Lederer

, & Christie

(Eds.), Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 47–69). New York, NY: Springer.

38.

Mirisola

, Roccato

, Russo

, Spagna

, & Vieno

(in press). Societal threat to safety, compensatory control, and right–wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology.

39.

Mischel

(1968). Personality and assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.

40.

Mondak

J. J.

, Hibbing

M. V.

, Canache

, Seligson

M. A.

, & Anderson

M. R.

(2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104, 85–110. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990359

41.

Nakagawa

, & Cuthill

I. C.

(2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologist. Biological Review, 82, 591–605.

42.

Onraet

, Van Hiel

, Dhont

, & Pattyn

(in press). Internal and external threat in relationship with right–wing attitudes. Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12011

43.

Peterson

B. E.

, & Gerstein

E. D.

(2005). Fighting and flying: Archival analysis of threat, authoritarianism, and the North American comic book. Political Psychology, 26, 887–904.

44.

Peterson

B. E.

, & Zurbriggen

E. L.

(2010). Gender, sex, and the authoritarian personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 1801–1826. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00670.x

45.

Pettigrew

T. F.

, Wagner

, & Christ

(2010). Population ratios and prejudice: Modelling both contact and threat effects. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 635–650. doi: 10.1080/13691830903516034

46.

Raudenbush

(1989). “Centering” predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices and consequences. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 1(2), 10–12.

47.

Raudenbush

S. W.

, & Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

48.

Rickert

E. J.

(1998). Authoritarianism and economic threat: Implications for political behavior. Political Psychology, 19, 707–720.

49.

Robinson

W. S.

(1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.

50.

Russo

, Roccato

, & Vieno

(2011). Predicting perceived risk of crime: A multilevel study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 384–394. doi: 10.1007/s10464–010–9386–x

51.

Sales

S. M.

(1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57.

52.

Sales

S. M.

, & Friend

K. E.

(1973). Success and failure as determinants of level of authoritarianism. Behavioral Science, 18, 163–172. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830180304

53.

Sibley

C. G.

, & Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta–analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. doi: 10.1177/1088868308319226.

54.

Sibley

C. R.

, Wilson

M. S.

, & Duckitt

(2007). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five–month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357–371.

55.

Stamatel

J. P.

(2009). Correlates of national–level homicide variation in post–communist East–Central Europe. Social Forces, 87, 1423–1448.

56.

Stenner

(2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Stevens

, Bishin

B. G.

, & Barr

R. R.

(2006). Authoritarian attitudes, democracy, and policy preferences among Latin American elites. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 606–620.

58.

Suthammanont

, Petersen

D. A. M.

, Owens

C. T.

, & Leighley

J. E.

(2010). Taking threat seriously: Prejudice, principle and attitudes toward racial policies. Political Behavior, 32, 231–253. doi: 10.1007/s11109–009–9102–4

59.

Van Hiel

, & De Clercq

(2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right–wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23, 33–50. doi: 10.1002/per.702

60.

Vieno

, Roccato

, & Russo

(submitted). Is fear of crime mainly social and economic insecurity in disguise? A multilevel multinational analysis. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology.

61.

Von Wright

G. H.

(1971). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

62.

Walklate

, & Mythen

(2008). How scared are we? British Journal of Criminology, 48, 209–225. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azm070