AckermanR. A., & CorrettiC. A. (2015). Pathological personality traits and intimacy processes within roommate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 29, 152–172.
2.
AndersonC., JohnO. P., KeltnerD., & KringA. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.
3.
AsendorpfJ. B., PenkeL., & BackM. D. (2011). From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long–term outcomes of speed–dating in a community sample. European Journal of Personality, 25, 16–30.
4.
AsendorpfJ. B., & WilpersS. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544.
5.
BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF.–M., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C.,… SchönbrodtF. D. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107.
6.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C., & EgloffB. (2011). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analyses of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 25, 225–238.
7.
BackM. D., & VazireS. (2015). The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research. European Journal of Personality, 29, 296–307.
8.
BaumeisterR. F. (1999). On the interface between personality and social psychology. In PervinL. A., & JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 367–377). New York: Guilford.
9.
BelskyJ., JaffeeS. R., CaspiA., MoffittT., & SilvaP. A. (2003). Intergenerational relationships in young adulthood and their life course, mental health, and personality correlates. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 460–471.
10.
BranjeS. J. T., van LieshoutC. F. M., & van AkenM. A. G. (2005). Relations between agreeableness and perceived support in family relationships: Why nice people are not always supportive. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 120–128.
11.
ConnellyB. S., & OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta–analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.
12.
CupermanR., & IckesW. (2009). Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 667–684.
13.
DyrenforthP. S., KashyD. A., DonnellanM. B., & LucasR. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702.
14.
HampsonS. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.
15.
IlmarinenV. J., VainikainenM. P., VerkasaloM., & LönnqvistJ. E. (2015). Why are Extraverts more Popular? Oral fluency mediates the effect of extraversion on popularity in middle childhood. European Journal of Personality, 29, 138–151.
16.
JudgeT. A., HellerD., & MountM. K. (2002). Five–factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.
17.
KüfnerA. C. P., NestlerS., & BackM. D. (2013). The two pathways to being an (un–)popular narcissist. Journal of Personality, 81, 184–195.
18.
KurziusE., & BorkenauP. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of mimicry. A naturalistic interaction approach. European Journal of Personality, 29, 107–124.
19.
LaceulleO. M., JeronimusB. F., van AkenM. A. G., & OrmelJ. (2015). Why not everybody gets their fair share of stress: Adolescent's perceived relationship affection mediates associations between temperament and subsequent stressful social events. European Journal of Personality, 29, 125–137.
20.
MalouffJ. M., ThorsteinssonE. B., SchutteN. S., BhullarN., & RookeS. E. (2010). The five–factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta–analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124–127.
21.
MarshallE. M., SimpsonJ. A., & RholesW. S. (2015). Personality, communication, and depressive symptoms across the transition to parenthood: A dyadic longitudinal investigation. European Journal of Personality, 29, 216–234.
22.
MorseP. J., SauerbergerK. S., ToddE., & FunderD. (2015). Relationships between personality, situational construal, and social outcomes. European Journal of Personality, 29, 97–106.
23.
MundM., FinnC., HagemeyerB., ZimmermannJ., & NeyerF. J. (2015). The dynamics of self–esteem in partner relationships. European Journal of Personality, 29, 235–249.
24.
NestlerS., GrimmK., & SchönbrodtF. D. (2015). The social consequences and mechanisms of personality: How to analyze longitudinal data from individual, dyadic, round–robin, and network designs. European Journal of Personality, 29, 272–295.
25.
OzerD. J., & Benet–MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
26.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta–analysis of the five–factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.
27.
ReitzA. K., ZimmermannJ., HuttemanR., SpechtJ., & NeyerF. J. (2014). How peers make a difference: The role of peer groups and peer relationships in personality development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 279–288.
28.
RobertsB. W., KuncelN. R., ShinerR., CaspiA., & GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.
29.
SadikajG., MoskowitzD. S., & ZuroffD. C. (2015). Felt security in daily interactions as a mediator of the effect of attachment on satisfaction with a romantic partner. European Journal of Personality, 29, 187–200.
30.
SchaffhuserK., AllemandM., & MartinM. (2014). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28, 120–133.
31.
SelfhoutM. H. W., BurkW. J., DenissenJ. J. A., BranjeS. J. T., van AkenM. A. G., & MeeusW. H. J. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509–538.
32.
SnyderM., & StukasA. A. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273–303.
33.
SpechtJ., BleidornW., DenissenJ. J. A., HenneckeM., HuttemanR., KandlerC.,… LuhmannM. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theories and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 28, 216–230.
34.
SwannW. B.Jr., & BossonJ. K. (2008). Identity negotiation: A theory of self and social interaction. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 448–471). New York: Guilford.
35.
VaterA., & Schröder–AbéM. (2015). Explaining the link between personality and relationship satisfaction: Emotion regulation and interpersonal behavior in conflict discussions. European Journal of Personality, 29, 201–215.
36.
VohsK. D., & FinkelE. J. (2006). Self and Relationships. Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes. New York: Guilford Press.
37.
VollrathM., KrahéB., & HampsonS. (2004). Personality and social relations [Special issue]. European Journal of Personality, 18(4).
38.
WagnerJ., LüdtkeO., RobertsB. W., & TrautweinU. (2014). Who belongs to Me? Social relationship and personality characteristics in the transition to young adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 28, 586–603.
39.
WilsonR. E., HarrisK., & VazireS. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: Do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction?European Journal of Personality, 29, 173–186.
40.
WoodD., GardnerM. H., & HarmsP. D. (in press). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review.
41.
WoodJ. V., TesserA., & HolmesJ. G. (2008). The Self and Social Relationships. New York: Psychology Press.
42.
WrzusC., & MehlM. R. (2015). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29, 250–271.