Affect,Behaviour,Cognition and Desire in the Big Five: An Analysis of Item Content and Structure

Abstract

Personality psychology is concerned with affect (A), behaviour (B), cognition (C) and desire (D), and personality traits have been defined conceptually as abstractions used to either explain or summarise coherent ABC (and sometimes D) patterns over time and space. However, this conceptual definition of traits has not been reflected in their operationalisation, possibly resulting in theoretical and practical limitations to current trait inventories. Thus, the goal of this project was to determine the affective, behavioural, cognitive and desire (ABCD) components of Big–Five personality traits. The first study assessed the ABCD content of items measuring Big–Five traits in order to determine the ABCD composition of traits and identify items measuring relatively high amounts of only one ABCD content. The second study examined the correlational structure of scales constructed from items assessing ABCD content via a large, web–based study. An assessment of Big–Five traits that delineates ABCD components of each trait is presented, and the discussion focuses on how this assessment builds upon current approaches of assessing personality. Copyright © 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

personality scales and inventories trait structure Big Five

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ailport

G. W.

(1958). What units shall we employ? In Lindzey

(Ed.), Assessment of human motives (pp. 239–260). New York: Rinehart.

Allport

G. W.

(1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.

Angleitner

, John

, & Löhr

(1986). It's what you ask and how you ask it: An itemmetric analysis of personality questionnaires. In Angleitner

, & Wiggin

J. S.

(Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires (pp. 61–107). Berlin: Springer–Verlag.

Ashton

M. C.

, & Lee

(2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.

Ashton

M. C.

, & Lee

(2005). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5–24.

Ashton

M. C.

, Lee

, Perugini

, Szarota

, de Vries

R. E.

, Di Blas

,… De Raad

(2004). A six–factor structure of personality–descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.

Atkinson

J. W.

, & Birch

(1970). The dynamics of action. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley.

Atkinson

J. W.

, & Raynor

J. O.

(1978). Personality, motivation, and achievement. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Bashaw

, & Anderson

H. E.

Jr. (1967). A correction for replicated error in correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 32, 435–441.

10.

Baumeister

R. F.

, Vohs

K. D.

, & Funder

D. C.

(2007). Psychology as the science of self–reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.

11.

Bliese

P. D.

, Chan

, & Ployhart

R. E.

(2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 551–563.

12.

Block

(1995). A contrarian view of the five–factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.

13.

Block

(2010). The five–factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.

14.

Bock

P. K.

(2000). Culture and personality revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 32–40.

15.

Borkenau

(1990). Traits as ideal–based and goal–derived social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 381–396.

16.

Bryk

A. S.

, & Raudenbush

S. W.

(1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Advanced qualitative techniques in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

17.

Buss

D. M.

, & Craik

K. H.

(1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.

18.

Cantor

(1990). From thought to behavior: “having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735–750.

19.

Carr

H. A.

, & Kingsbury

F. A.

(1938). The concept of traits. Psychological Review, 45, 497.

20.

Carver

C. S.

(2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345–356.

21.

Carver

C. S.

, & Scheier

M. F.

(2009). Self–regulation and control in personality functioning. In Corr

P. J.

, & Matthews

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 427–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Cattell

R. B.

(1946). Description and measurement of personality. Oxford, UK: World Book.

23.

Cattell

R. B.

(1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Oxford, UK: World Book.

24.

Cervone

(2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183–204.

25.

Chulef

A. S.

, Read

S. J.

, & Walsh

D. A.

(2001). A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 191–232.

26.

Condon

D. M.

, & Revelle

(2014). The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public–domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64.

27.

Costa

P. T.

, & McCrae

R. R.

(1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.

28.

Costa

P. T.

, & McCrae

R. R.

(1992b). NEO PI–R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

29.

Costa

P. T.

, & McCrae

R. R.

(1998). Six approaches to the explication of facet–level traits: Examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12, 117–134.

30.

Craik

K. H.

(2000). The lived day of an individual: A person–environment perspective. In Bruce

B. W.

, Craik

K. H.

, & Price

R. H.

(Eds.), Person–environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 233–266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

31.

Cureton

(1966). Corrected item–test correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 93–96.

32.

Deary

I. J.

(2009). The trait approach to personality. In Corr

P. J.

, & Matthews

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 427–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2006). Higher–order factors of the big five in a multi–informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.

34.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Quilty

L. C.

, & Peterson

J. B.

(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.

35.

Digman

J. M.

(1997). Higher–order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.

36.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(1994). William James and emotion: Is a century of fame worth a century of misunderstanding? Psychological Review, 101, 222–229.

37.

Emmons

R. A.

(1989). Exploring the relations between motives and traits: The case of narcissism. In Buss

D. M.

, & Cantor

(Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 32–44). New York: Springer–Verlag.

38.

Evans

A. M.

, & Revelle

(2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585–1593.

39.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & K. Paul.

40.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1959). The “Maudsley Personality Inventory” as determinant of neurotic tendency and extraversion. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie. 6 Apr–Jun 1959, 167–190.

41.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1992). A hundred years of personality research, from Heymans to modern times. Houten: Bohn, Stafleu Van Loghum.

42.

Eysenck

H. J.

, & Eysenck

S. B. G.

(1964). Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego, California: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

43.

Eysenck

H. J.

, & Himmelweit

H. T.

(1947). Dimensions of personality: A record of research carried out in collaboration with H. T. Himmelweit [and others]. London: K. Paul, Trench.

44.

Fleeson

(2001). Toward a structure– and process–integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.

45.

Fleeson

, & Gallagher

(2009). The implications of big five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience–sampling studies and a meta–analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.

46.

Fleiss

(1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed., pp.). New York, NY: Wiley.

47.

Funder

D. C.

(1991). Global traits: A neo–Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31–39.

48.

Funder

D. C.

(2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.

49.

Funder

D. C.

(2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.

50.

Furr

R. M.

(2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369–401.

51.

Galton

(1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 36, 179–185.

52.

Giere

(1999). Science without laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

53.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1974). Objective diagnostic tests and measures. Annual Review of Psychology, 25, 343–366.

54.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big–five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

55.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1992). The development of markers for the big–five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.

56.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1999). A broad–bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower–level facets of several five–factor models. In Mervielde

, Deary

, De Fruyt

, & Os– tendorf

(Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (pp. 7–28) 7. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

57.

Goldberg

L. R.

, Johnson

J. A.

, Eber

H. W.

, Hogan

, Ashton

M. C.

, Cloninger

C. R.

, & Gough

H. G.

(2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public–domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.

58.

Gough

(1965). Conceptual analysis of psychological test scores and other diagnostic variables. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 294–302.

59.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.

60.

Greenwald

A. G.

, Nosek

B. A.

, & Banaji

M. R.

(2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.

61.

Grucza

R. A.

, & Goldberg

L. R.

(2007). The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: Predictions of behavioral act, informant reports, and clinical indicators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 167–187.

62.

Gruszka

, Matthews

, & Szymura

(2010). Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control. New York: Springer Verlag.

63.

Guilford

J. P.

, & Zimmerman

W. S.

(1949). The Guilford–Zimmerman temperament survey. Oxford, UK: Sheridan Supply.

64.

Heckhausen

(1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer–Verlag.

65.

Hofstee

W. K.

, de Raad

, & Goldberg

L. R.

(1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163.

66.

Hogan

(2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

67.

Humphreys

M. S.

, & Revelle

(1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153–184.

68.

Jackson

J. J.

, Wood

, Bogg

, Walton

K. E.

, Harms

P. D.

, & Roberts

B. W.

(2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.

69.

Jebb

R. C.

(1909). Introduction to the characters of Theophrastus. London: Macmillan and Co..

70.

John

O. P.

, Donahue

E. M.

, & Kentle

R. L.

(1991). The big five inventory–versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

71.

Johnson

J. A.

(1997). Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In Hogan

, Johnson

J. A.

, & Briggs

S. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 73–93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

72.

Kenny

D. A.

(2014). Measuring model fit. Retrieved April 1, 2014 from http://www.davidkenny.net/cm/fit.htm.

73.

Lamiell

J. T.

(2000). A periodic table of personality elements? The ‘big five’ and trait ‘psychology’ in critical perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 20, 1–24.

74.

Lewin

, Adams

D. K.

, & Zener

K. E.

(1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York and London: McGraw–Hill.

75.

Lewis–Fernandez

, & Kleinman

(1994). Culture, personality, and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 67–71.

76.

Locke

E. A.

, & Latham

G. P.

(2006). Further confusion in the study of self–regulation: Comments on Cervone, Shadel, Smith, and Fiori. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 428–438.

77.

Loevinger

(1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.

78.

Lord

F. M.

(1955). Sampling fluctuations resulting from the sampling of test items. Psychometrika, 20, 1–22.

79.

MacDonald

(1995). Evolution, the five–factor model, and levels of personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 525–567.

80.

Mayer

J. D.

(1998). A systems framework for the field of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 118–144.

81.

Mayer

J. D.

(2001). Primary divisions of personality and their scientific contributions: From the trilogy–of–mind to the systems set. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 449–477.

82.

McAdams

D. P.

(1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396.

83.

McAdams

D. P.

, & Pals

J. L.

(2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.

84.

McClelland

D. C.

(1951). Personality. New York: Sloane.

85.

McCrae

R. R.

(2009). The five–factor model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. In Corr

P. J.

, & Matthews

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 427–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

86.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

(1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.

87.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

(2008). The five–factor theory of personality. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

88.

Meehl

P. E.

(1990). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 108–141.

89.

Mischel

(1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.

90.

Mischel

, & Shoda

(1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246.

91.

Mount

M. K.

, Barrick

M. R.

, Scullen

S. M.

, & Rounds

(2005). Higher–order dimensions of the big five personality traits and the big six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58, 447–478.

92.

Noftle

E. E.

, & Fleeson

(2010). Age differences in big five behavior averages and variabilities across the adult life span: Moving beyond retrospective, global summary accounts of personality. Psychology and Aging, 25, 95–107.

93.

Norman

W. T.

(1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.

94.

Ortony

, Norman

D. A.

, & Revelle

(2005). Effective functioning: A three level model of affect, motivation, cognition, and behavior. In Fellous

, & Arbib

(Eds.), Who needs emotions? The brain meets the machine (pp. 173–202). New York: Oxford University Press.

95.

Ozer

D. J.

, & Benet–Martinez

(2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.

96.

Paulhus

, & Vazire

(2007). The self–report method. In Robins

R. W.

, Fraley

C. R.

, & Krueger

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

97.

Pervin

L. A.

(1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103–113.

98.

Pinheiro

, Bates

, DebRoy

, & Sarkar

(2014). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Retrieved from http://www.cran.r–project.org/package=nlme

99.

Pytlik Zillig

L. M.

, Hemenover

S. H.

, & Dienstbier

R. A.

(2002). What do we assess when we assess a big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral and cognitive processes represented in the big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847–858.

100.

R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r–project.org

101.

Read

S. J.

, Jones

D. K.

, & Miller

L. C.

(1990). Traits as goal–based categories: The importance of goals in the coherence of dispositional categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1048–1061.

102.

Revelle

(1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295–328.

103.

Revelle

(2008). The contribution of reinforcement sensitivity theory to personality theory. In Corr

P. J.

(Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory (pp. 508–527). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

104.

Revelle

(2014). Psych version 1.4.8: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Retrieved from http://www.cran.r–project.org/package=psych

105.

Revelle

, & Rocklin

(1979). Very simple structure – alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 403–414.

106.

Revelle

, Wilt

, & Rosenthal

(2010). Individual differences in cognition: New methods for examining the personality–cognition link. In Gruszka

, Matthews

, & Szymura

(Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory and executive control (pp. 27–49). New York: Springer.

107.

Roberts

B. W.

(2009). Back to the future: Personality and Assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 137–145.

108.

Roberts

B. W.

, & Jackson

J. J.

(2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523–1544.

109.

Roberts

B. W.

, Kuncel

N. R.

, Shiner

, Caspi

, & Goldberg

L. R.

(2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.

110.

Saucier

(2009). Semantic and linguistic aspects of personality. In Corr

P. J.

, & Matthews

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 379–399). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

111.

Scherer

K. R.

(1995). Plato's legacy: Relationships between cognition, emotion, and motivation. Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 9, 1–7.

112.

Scherer

K. R.

, Schorr

, & Johnstone

(2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York, NY US: Oxford University Press.

113.

Shrout

P. E.

, & Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

114.

Shweder

R. A.

(1999). Why cultural psychology? Ethos, 27, 62–73.

115.

Shweder

R. A.

, & Sullivan

M. A.

(1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 497–523.

116.

Tellegen

(1982). Brief manual for the differential personality questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. University of Minnesota.

117.

Tellegen

(1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence and assessment. In Cicchetti

, & Grove

(Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

118.

Vazire

, & Mehl

(2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self–ratings and other–ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202.

119.

Velicer

(1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327.

120.

Watson

(2000). Mood and temperament. Emotions and social behavior. New York: Guilford Press.

121.

Werner

P. D.

, & Pervin

L. A.

(1986). The content of personality inventory items. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 622–628.

122.

Wilson

G. D.

, Gray

J. A.

, & Barrett

P. T.

(1990). A factor analysis of the Gray–Wilson personality questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1037–1045.

123.

Wilt

, & Revelle

(2009). Extraversion. In Leary

, & Hoyle

(Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 27–45). New York: Guilford.

124.

Winter

D. G.

, John

O. P.

, Stewart

A. J.

, Klohnen

E. C.

, & Duncan

L. E.

(1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.

125.

Wundt

(1897). Outlines of psychology. Oxford, UK: Engelmann.

126.

Yang

, Read

S. J.

, Denson

T. F.

, Xu

, Zhang

, & Pedersen

W. C.

(2014). The key ingredients of personality traits situations, behaviors, and explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 79–91.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB

0.01 MB