AlessandriG., VecchioneM., DonnellanB. M., EisenbergN., CapraraG. V., & CieciuchJ. (2014). On the cross–cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82, 340–353. DOI:10.1111/jopy.12065.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In LindzeyG. (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Cambridge, MA: Addison–Wesley.
3.
AsendorpfJ. B., DenissenJ. J., & van AkenM. A. (2008). Inhibited and aggressive preschool children at 23 years of age: personality and social transitions into adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44, 997–1011. DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.997.
4.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.
5.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2012). On models of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 26(4), 433–434. DOI:10.1002/per.1868.
6.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., PeruginiM., SzarotaP., De VriesR. E., Di BlasL., … & De RaadB. (2004). A six–factor structure of personality–descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.
7.
AydinN., KruegerJ. I., FreyD., KastenmüllerA., & FischerP. (2014). Social exclusion and xenophobia: Intolerant attitudes toward ethnic and religious minorities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 371–387.
8.
BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF.–M., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., SchönbrodtF. D., … (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107. DOI:10.1002/per.811.
9.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C., & EgloffB. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self–concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548.
10.
BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF.–M, PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., … & WrzusC. (2011a). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107. DOI:10.1002/per.811
11.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C. & EgloffB. (2011b). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analysis of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 25, 225–238. DOI:10.1002/per.790
12.
BallietD., MulderL. B., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594–615.
13.
BallietD., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090–1112.
14.
BarkerR. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
BaumeisterR. F., VohsK. D., & FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self–reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.
16.
BeckA. T., FreemanA., & DavisD. D. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (2nd ed., pp.). New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
BenjaminL. T.Jr., & SimpsonJ. A. (2009). The power of the situation: The impact of Milgram's obedience studies on personality and social psychology. American Psychologist, 64(1), 12–19. Retrieved from 10.1037/a0014077
18.
BischofN. (2014). Psychologie: Ein Grundkurs für Anspruchsvolle (3. ed., pp.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
19.
BlackieL. E. R., & JayawickremeE. (2014). Promoting change in post–traumatic growth research: Response to commentaries. European Journal of Personality, 28, 351–361.
20.
BlackieL. E. R., JayawickremeE., ForgeardM. J. C., & JayawickremeN. (2014) The protective function of personal growth initiative among a genocide–affected population in Rwanda. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/tra0000010
21.
BlackieL. E. R., RoepkeA. M., ForgeardM. J. C., JayawickremeE., & FleesonW. (2014) Act well to be well: The promise of changing personality states to promote well–being. In ed. ParksA. C. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychological interventions. (pp. 463–473). Wiley–Blackwell.
22.
BlackieL. E. R., JayawickremeE., HelzerE. G., ForgeardM. J. C., & RoepkeA. M. (in press). Investigating the veracity of self–perceived post–traumatic growth: A profile analysis approach to corroborationSocial Psychological and Personality Science. DOI:10.1177/1948550615587986.
23.
BleidornW. (2009). Linking personality states, current social roles and major life goals. European Journal of Personality, 23(6), 509–530. DOI:10.1002/per.731.
24.
BleidornW. (2012). Hitting the road to adulthood short–term personality development during a major life transition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1594–1608.
25.
BloomP. (2004). Descartes‘ baby: How child development explains what makes us human. London, England: Arrow Books.
26.
BondR. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 331–354. DOI:10.1177/1368430205056464.
27.
BrunswickE. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 192–217.
28.
BrunswikE. (1956). Perception and the representative design of experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
BussD. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.
30.
CarlsonR. (1984). What's social about social psychology? Where's the person in personality research?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1304–1309.
31.
CarrollJ. D., & ChangJ. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N–way generalization of “Eckart–Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283–319.
32.
CaspiA., & MoffittT. E. (1993). When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 247–271.
33.
CattellR. B. (1958). What is “objective” in “objective personality tests?”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5(4), 285–289.
34.
CervoneD. (2005). Personality architecture: Within–person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.
35.
ChandlerM. J., & DunlopW. L. (in press). Personal and cultural identities: Development and persistence. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
36.
ClarkinJ. F., YeomansF., & KernbergO. F. (2006). Psychotherapy of borderline personality: Focusing on object relations. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc..
37.
CooperW. H., & WitheyM. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 13(1), 62–72. DOI:10.1177/1088868308329378.
DhamiM. K., HertwigR., & HoffrageU. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 959–988.
40.
EidM. (2000). A multitrait–mulitmethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241–261.
41.
EmmonsR. A., DienerE., & LarsenR. J. (1986). Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 815–826.
42.
EpsteinS. (1984). The stability of behavior across time and situations. In ZuckerR., AronoffJ., & RabinA. I. (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 209–268). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
FinnC., MitteK., & NeyerF. J. (2015). Recent decreases in specific interpretation biases predict decreases in neuroticism: Evidence from a longitudinal study with young adult couples. Journal of Personality, 83, 274–286. DOI:10.1111/jopy.12102.
45.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure– and process–integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011.
46.
FleesonW. (2007). Situation–based contingencies underlying trait–content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 825–862. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x.
47.
FleesonW. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In DeauxK., & SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. (pp. 33–63). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
FleesonW. (2014). Four ways of (not) being real and whether they are essential for post–traumatic growth. European Journal of Psychology, 28, 336–337.
49.
FleesonW., & JayawickremeE. (in press). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.
50.
FleesonW., & NoftleE. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1667–1684. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00122.x.
51.
FournierM. A., MoskowitzD. S., & ZuroffD. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 531–545. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.531.
52.
FrazierP., CoyneJ., & TennenH. (2014). Post–traumatic growth: A call for less, but better, research. European Journal of Psychology, 28, 337–338.
53.
FrederiksenN., JensenO., BeatonA. E., & BloxomB. (1973). Prediction of organizational behavior. Pergamon, New York.
54.
FunderD. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652.
55.
FunderD. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34.
56.
FunderD. C. (2007). Beyond just–so stories towards a psychology of situations: Evolutionary accounts of individual differences require independent assessment of personality and situational variables. European Journal of Personality, 21(5), 599–601.
57.
FunderD. C., & OzerD. J. (1983). Behavior as a function of the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 107–112.
58.
FurrR. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioral science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369–401.
59.
Gallardo–PujolD., OrekhovaE., Benet–MartínezV., & SlaterM. (2015). Taking evil into the lab: Exploring the frontiers of morality and individual differences. In MillerC., KnobelA., FurrM., & FleesonW. (Eds.), Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60.
GamerJ., SchmukleS. C., Luka–KrausgrillU., & EgloffB. (2008). Examining the dynamics of the implicit and the explicit self–concept in social anxiety: Changes in the Implicit Association Test–Anxiety and the Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory following treatment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 476–480.
61.
GeiserC., LitsonK., BishopJ., KellerB. T., BurnsG. L., ServeraM., & ShiffmanS. (2014). Analyzing person, situation and person × situation interaction effects: Latent state–trait models for the combination of random and fixed situations.
62.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad–bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower–level facets of several five–factor models. In MervieldeI., DearyI., De FruytF., & OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
63.
GrossJ. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26.
HalevyN., ChouE. Y., & MurnighamK. (2012). Mind games: The mental representation of conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 132–148. DOI:10.1037/a0025389.
66.
HartgerinkC. H. J., Van BeestI., WichertsJ. M., & WilliamsK. D. (2015) (Unpublished manuscript). Ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta–analysis of Cyberball studies. Retrieved from https://osf.io/ht25n/
67.
HartupW. W., & StevensN. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370.
68.
HaseltonM. G., & BussD. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross–sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81.
69.
HaslamN., LoughnanS., & PerryG. (2014). Meta–Milgram: an empirical synthesis of the obedience experiments. PLoS One, 9(4), e93927. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093927.
70.
HeckS. A., & PincusA. L. (2001). Agency and communion in the structure of parental representations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 180–184.
71.
HeeneM., HilbertS., DraxlerC., ZieglerM., & BühnerM. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 319–336. DOI:10.1037/a0024917.
72.
HelzerE. G., & JayawickremeE. (2015). Control and the “good life”: Primary and secondary control as distinct indicators of well–being. Social and Personality Psychological Science. DOI:10.1177/1948550615576210.
73.
HirschmüllerS., EgloffB., NestlerS., & BackM. D. (2013). The dual lens model: A comprehensive framework for understanding self–other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 335–353.
74.
HoffmanD. (2009). The interface theory of perception: Natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction. In DickinsonS., TarrM., LeonardisA., & SchieleB. (Eds.), Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives (pp. 148–165). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality?European Journal of Personality, 8, 149–162. DOI:10.1002/per.2410080302.
76.
HopwoodC. J., PincusA. L., & WrightA. G. C. (in press). The interpersonal situation: Integrating personality assessment, case formulation, and intervention. In SamuelD., & LynamD. (Eds.), Purdue symposium on psychological science. New York: Oxford.
77.
HopwoodC. J., WrightA. G. C., AnsellE. B., & PincusA. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 270–295.
78.
HorowitzL. M., WilsonK. R., TuranB., ZolotsevP., ConstantinoM. J., & HendersonL. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 67–86.
79.
HuangJ. L., & RyanA. (2011). Beyond personality traits: A study of personality states and situational contingencies in customer service jobs. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 451–488. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01216.x.
80.
HughesS., & Barnes–HolmesD. (in press). Relational frame theory: Implications for the study of human language and cognition. In HayesS., Barnes–HolmesD., ZettleR., & BiglanT. (Eds.), Handbook of contextual behavioral science. New York: Wiley–Blackwell.
81.
IckesW., SnyderM., & GarciaS. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In HoganR., J. Johnson, & BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165–195). New York: Academic Press.
82.
JacksonD. N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. Psychological Review, 78, 229–248.
83.
JacksonJ. J., ThoemmesF., JonkmannK., LüdtkeO., & TrautweinU. (2012). Military training and personality trait development does the military make the man, or does the man make the military?Psychological Science, 23, 270–277.
84.
JayawickremeE., & BlackieL. E. R. (2014). Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28, 312–31.
85.
JohnO. P., NaumannL. P., & SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.
86.
JohnsonJ. A. (1999a). Persons in situations: Distinguishing new wine from old wine in new bottles. In I. Van Mechelen & B. De Raad (Eds.), Personality and situations [Special Issue]. European Journal of Personality, 13, 443–453. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<443::AID–PER358>3.0.CO;2–9
JohnsonJ. A. (2009). Wrong and right questions about persons and situations. In B. Donnellan, R. Lucas, & W. Fleeson (Eds.), Personality and assessment at age 40 [Special Issue]. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 251–252. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.022.
90.
JonesA. B., BrownN. A., SerfassD. G., & ShermanR. A. (2014). Traumatic experiences yield changes in the situation experience. European Journal of Personality, 28, 339–340.
91.
KahnemanD., KruegerA. B., SchkadeD. A., SchwarzN., & StoneA. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.
92.
KahnemanD., & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.
93.
KandlerC., BleidornW., RiemannR., AngleitnerA., & SpinathF. M. (2012). Life events as environmental states and genetic traits and the role of personality: A longitudinal twin study. Behavior Genetics, 42, 57–72.
94.
KelleyH. H., HolmesJ. G., KerrN. L., ReisH. T., RusbultC. E., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95.
KelleyH. H., & ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
96.
KelleyH. H., & ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
97.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
98.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
99.
KlirsE. G., & RevelleW. (1986). Predicting variability from perceived situational similarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(1), 34–50.
100.
KochT., OrtnerT., EidM., & SchmittM. (2014). Evaluating the construct validity of objective personality tests using a multitrait–multimethod–multioccasion (MTMM–MO) approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 208–230.
101.
KrauseS., BackM. D., EgloffB., & SchmukleS. C. (2014). Implicit interpersonal attraction in small groups: Automatically activated evaluations predict actual behavior toward social partners. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 671–679. DOI:10.1177/1948550613517723.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
104.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
105.
LakatosI. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
106.
LaudanL. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
107.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
108.
LazarusR. S., & FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
109.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1053.
110.
LewinK. (1943). Defining the field at a given time. Psychological Review, 50, 292–310.
111.
LucasR. E., ClarkA. E., GeorgellisY., & DienerE. (2004). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.
112.
LuhmannM., OrthU., SpechtJ., KandlerC., & LucasR. E. (2014). Studying changes in life circumstances and personality: It's about time. European Journal of Personality, 28, 256–266.
113.
LukowitskyM. R., & PincusA. L. (2011). The pantheoretical nature of mental representations and their ability to predict interpersonal adjustment in a nonclinical sample. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28, 48–74.
114.
Maynard–SmithJ. (1974). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. Theoretical Journal of Biology, 47, 209–221. DOI:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6
115.
MehlM. R., & HolleranS. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of the obtrusiveness of and participants‘ compliance with the electronically activated recorder (EAR). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 248–257.
116.
MehlM. R., PennebakerJ. W., CrowM. D., DabbsJ., & PriceJ. H. (2001). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 517–523.
117.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. London: Tavistock. DOI: 10.2307/3032069
118.
MillerK. E., & RasmussenA. (2014). War experiences, daily stressors and mental health five years on: Elaborations and future directions. Intervention, 12, 33–42. DOI:10.1097/WTF.0000000000000066.
119.
MinbashianA., WoodR. E., & BeckmannN. (2010). Task–contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 793–806. DOI:10.1037/a0020016.
120.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
121.
MolenaarP. C. M., & CampbellC. G. (2009). The new person–specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.
122.
MontgomeryJ. D. (1998). Toward a role–theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 92–125. DOI:10.1086/210003.
123.
MorseP., NeelR., ToddE., & FunderD. C. (in press). Renovating situational taxonomies: Exploring the construction and content of fundamental situation types. Journal of Personality.
124.
MroczekD. K., & SpiroA. (2003). Modeling intraindividual change in personality traits: Findings from the Normative Aging Study. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58, 153–165.
125.
MroczekD. K. (2014). Personality plasticity, healthy aging, and interventions. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1470–1474.
126.
MurrayH. A. (1996). Bartleby and I. In VincentH. P. (ed.), Bartleby the Scrivener (pp. 17–18). Ohio: Kent.
127.
NelsonS. K., KushlevK., & LyubomirskyS. (2014). The pains and pleasures of parenthood: When, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less well–being?Psychological Bulletin, 140, 846–895.
NietzscheF. (1988). The wanderer and his shadow. In HollingdaleR. J. (Ed.), A Nietzsche reader. London, England: Penguin. (Original work was published in 1880)
130.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
131.
OvertonW. F. (1997). Beyond dichotomy: An embodied active agent for cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 3, 315–334.
132.
OzerD. J., & Benet–MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
133.
PackerD. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram's obedience experiments: A meta–analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 301–304. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00080.x.
134.
PangalloA., ZibarrasL., LewisR., & FlaxmanP. (2015). Resilience through the lens of interactionism: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 1–20. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12175
135.
PenkeL., DenissenJ. J. A., & MillerG. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587. DOI:10.1002/per.629.
136.
PeruginiM., CostantiniG., HughesS., & De HouwerJ. (2015). A functional perspective on personality. International Journal of Psychology. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12175
137.
PervinL. A. (1978). Definitions, measurements, and classifications of stimuli, situations, and environments. Human Ecology, 6, 71–105.
138.
PincusA. L. (2005). A contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality disorders. In LenzenwegerM., & ClarkinJ. (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd Ed.) (pp. 282–331). New York: Guilford.
139.
PincusA. L., & AnsellE. B. (2003). Interpersonal theory of personality. In MillonT., & LernerM. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology Vol. 5: Personality and social psychology (pp. 209–229). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
140.
PincusA. L., & AnsellE. B. (2013). Interpersonal theory of personality. In SulsJ., & TennenH. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, vol. 5, personality and social psychology (2nd ed) (pp. 141–159). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
141.
PincusA. L., LukowitskyM. R., WrightA. G. C., & EichlerW. C. (2009). The interpersonal nexus of persons, situations, and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 264–265.
142.
PincusA. L., SadlerP., WoodyE., RocheM. J., ThomasK. M., & WrightA. G. C. (2014). Assessing interpersonal dynamics. In HopwoodC.J., & BornsteinR.F. (Eds.), Multimethod clinical assessment (pp. 51–91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
143.
PincusA. L., & WrightA. G. C. (2011). Interpersonal diagnosis of psychopathology. In HorowitzL.M., & StrackS. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology. (pp. 359–381). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
144.
PopperK. R. S. (1950). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
145.
PosnerJ., RussellJ. A., & PetersonB. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 715–734.
146.
ProkopZ. M., MichalczykŁ., DrobniakS. M., HerdegenM., & RadwanJ. (2012). Meta–analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than “good genes.”. Evolution, 66, 2665–2673. DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01654.x.
147.
RamN., ConroyD. E., PincusA. L., LorekA., ReberA. L., RocheM. J., CocciaM., … (2014). Examining the interplay of processes across multiple time–scales: Illustration with the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB). Research in Human Development, 11, 142–160.
148.
RapoportA., & GuyerM. (1996). A taxonomy of 2 × 2 games. General Systems, 11, 203–214.
149.
RauthmannJ. F. (2012). You say the party is dull, I say it is lively: A componential approach to how situations are perceived to disentangle perceiver, situation, and perceiver x situation variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 519–528.
150.
RauthmannJ. F. (in press). Structuring situational information: A road map of the multiple pathways to different situational taxonomies. European Psychologist.
151.
RauthmannJ. F., Gallardo–PujolD., GuillaumeE. M., ToddE., NaveC. S., ShermanR. A., ZieglerM., … (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.
152.
RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (in press). Measuring the Situational Eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations: An optimization of the RSQ–8 to the S8*. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
153.
RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR. A., & FunderD. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.
154.
RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR. A., NaveC. N., & FunderD. A. (in press). Personality–driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people's personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 55(2015), 98–111.
155.
ReisH. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 311–329.
156.
ReisH. T., CollinsW. A., & BerscheidE. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.
157.
RevelleW., & SchererK. R. (2009). Personality and emotion. In SanderD. & SchererK. R. (Eds.), Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 303–305). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
158.
RiebelK., EgloffB., & WitthöftM. (2014). Modifying the implicit illness–related self–concept in patients with somatoform disorders may reduce somatic symptoms. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 861–868.
159.
RobertsB. W., KuncelN. R., ShinerR., CaspiA., & GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.
160.
RocheM. J., PincusA. L., ConroyD. E., HydeA. L., & RamN. (2013). Pathological narcissism and interpersonal behavior in daily life. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 315–323.
161.
RocheM. J., PincusA. L., HydeA. L., ConroyD. E., & RamN. (2013). Within–person co–variation of agentic and communal perceptions: Implications for interpersonal theory and assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 445–552.
162.
RocheM. J., PincusA. L., RebarA. L., ConroyD. E., & RamN. (2014). Enriching psychological assessment using a person–specific analysis of interpersonal processes in daily life. Assessment, 21, 515–528.
163.
RortyA. O. (1987). Persons as rhetorical categories. Social Research, 54, 55–72.
164.
RosemanI. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5, 141–149.
165.
SadlerP., EthierN., GunnG. R., DuongD., & WoodyE. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1005–1020.
SaucierG., Bel–BaharT., & FernandezC. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479–504.
168.
ScarrS., & McCartneyK. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype→environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.
169.
SchmittM. (2006). Conceptual, theoretical, and historical foundations of multimethod assessment. In EidM., & DienerE. (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 9–25). New York: American Psychological Association.
170.
SchuellerS. M., JayawickremeE., BlackieL. E. R., ForgeardM. J. C., & RoepkeA. M. (2015). Finding character strengths through loss: An extension of Peterson and Seligman (2003). Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 53–63. DOI:10.1080/17439760.2014.920405.
171.
SeeryM. D., HolmanE. A., & SilverR. C. (2010). Whatever does not kill us: Cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 1025–41. DOI:10.1037/a0021344.
172.
SerfassD. G., & ShermanR. A. (2013). Personality and the perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(12), 708–718.
173.
ShermanR. A., RauthmannJ. F., BrownN. A., SerfassD. G., & JonesA. B. (in press). The independent effects of personality and situations on real–time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
174.
SnyderM., & CantorN. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In GilbertD. T., FiskeS. T., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 635–679) 2. New York: McGraw–Hill.
175.
SnyderM., & IckesW. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In AronsonE., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 248–305). New York: Random House.
176.
SteyerR., SchmittM., & EidM. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.
177.
StrackF., & DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 8, 220–247.
178.
SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
179.
SulsJ., & MartinR. (2005). The daily life of the garden–variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1509. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x.
180.
TedeschiR. G., & CalhounL. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. DOI:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01.
181.
TellegenA. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence and assessment. In GroveW., & CicchettiD. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl (Vol. 2, pp. 10–35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
182.
TennenH., & AffleckG. (1998) Personality and transformation in the face of adversity. In TedeschiR. G., ParkC. L., & CalhounL. G. (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 65–98). Erlbaum.
183.
TurkheimerE., & WaldronM. (2000). Nonshared environment: A theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 78–108.
184.
Van DoesumN. J., Van LangeD. A. W., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 86–103.
185.
Van LangeP. A. M., & BallietD. (2014). Interdependence theory. In DovidioJ., & SimpsonJ. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Interpersonal relations and group processes (Volume 3, pp. 65–92). New York: American Psychological Association.
186.
Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). What we should expect from theories in social psychology: Truth, abstraction, progress, and applicability as standards (TAPAS). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 40–55.
187.
WagermanS. A., & FunderD. C. (2009). Situations. In CorrP. J., & MathewsG. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 27–42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
188.
WangS., RocheM. J., PincusA. L., ConroyD. E., RebarA. L., & RamN. (2014). Interpersonal dependency and emotion in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 5–12.
189.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society (pp. 1922). New York, NY: Bedminster Press. Original published in German.
190.
WestS. A., El MoudenC., & GardnerA. (2011). Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(4), 231–262. DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.001.
191.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.
192.
WigginsJ. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In CicchettiD., & GroveW. M. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
193.
WigginsJ. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford.
194.
WilliamsK. D., & JarvisB. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on ostracism and interpersonal acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 38, 174–180.
195.
WiltJ., FunkhouserK., & RevelleW. (2011). The dynamic relationships of affective synchrony to perceptions of situations and personality states. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(3), 309–321.
196.
WishM., DeutschM., & BienerL. (1970). Differences in conceptual structures of nations: An exploratory study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(3), 361–373.
197.
WrzusC., & MehlM. R. (in press). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality. DOI:10.1002/per.1986.
198.
ZehetleitnerM., & SchönbrodtF. D. (2015). When misrepresentation is successful. In BreyerT. (Ed.), Epistemological dimensions of evolutionary psychology (pp. 197–222). New York: Springer.
199.
ZekiS. (1994). A vision of the brain. Optometry and Vision Science. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199406000-00010
200.
ZieglerM. (2014). B5PS. Big Five Inventory of personality in occupational situations. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried GmbH.
201.
ZieglerM., & HorstmannK. (in press). Discovering the second side of the coin: Integrating situational perception into psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
202.
ZieglerM., KemperC. J., & KruyenP. (2014). Short scales—Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. DOI:10.1027/1614-0001/a000148.
203.
ZieglerM., PoropatA., & MellJ. (2014). Does the length of a questionnaire matter?Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 250–261. DOI:10.1027/1614-0001/a000147.
204.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. DOI:10.1086/228311.
205.
ZimmermanD. W. (1975). Probability spaces, Hilbert spaces, and the axioms of test theory. Psychometrika, 40, 395–412.
206.
ZimmermanD. W. (1976). Test theory with minimal assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 85–96.