Homophilous Friendship Assortment Based on Personality Traits and Cognitive Ability in Middle Childhood: The Moderating Effect of Peer Network Size

Abstract

Even though homophily (love of the same) is often thought of as a standard feature of friendships, the empirical evidence for attraction based on personality trait similarity is mixed at best. One reason for the inconsistent findings across studies could be variation in the large–scale social environment in which the studies have been conducted. We investigated whether diversity in the everyday social ecologies of 7– to 8–year–old children (N = 549) moderates whether friendships are formed on the basis of similar personality traits and similar levels of Cognitive ability. Moderated polynomial regression and response surface analyses showed that classroom size moderated homophily based on Openness to Experience: children similar in Openness were more likely to form friendship ties, but only in larger classrooms. Moreover, we found homophily for Cognitive ability, especially among girls. The results for Openness and Cognitive ability were independent of each other. We discuss the social relevance of trait Openness and the notion that capacity to reciprocate underlies homophily based on Cognitive ability. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

homophily personality cognitive ability friendships childhood social networks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

P. L.

, & Heggestad

E. D.

(1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.

Adams

R. G.

, & Blieszner

(1994). An integrative conceptual framework for friendship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 163–184.

Adams

R. G.

, & Allan

(1998). Contextualizing friendship. In Adams

R. G.

, & Allan

(Eds.), Placing friendship in context (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Allan

(1993). Social structure and relationships. In Duck

(Ed.), Understanding relationship processess (pp. 1–25), Social context and relationships 3. Newbury Park, California, US: Sage.

Asendorpf

J. B.

, & Wilpers

(1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544.

Bahns

A. J.

, Crandall

C. S.

, Gillath

, & Preacher

K. J.

(2016, February 1). Similarity in relationships as niche construction: Choice, stability, and influence within dyads in a free choice environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000088.

Bahns

A. J.

, Pickett

K. M.

, & Crandall

C. S.

(2011). Social ecology of similarity: Big schools, small schools and social relationships. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 119–131.

Bakshy

, Messing

, & Adamic

(2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, aaa1160.

Berndt

T. J.

, & Hoyle

S. G.

(1985). Stability and change in childhood and adolescent friendships. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1007–1015.

10.

Byrne

(1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713–715.

11.

Cheng

, Bond

M. H.

, & Chan

S. C.

(1995). The perception of ideal best friends by Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 91–108.

12.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

, & Marks

P. E. L.

(2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In Cillessen

A. H. N.

, Schwartz

, & Mayeux

(Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). New York: Guilford Press.

13.

Cohen

T. R.

, Panter

A. T.

, Turan

, Morse

, & Kim

(2013). Agreement and similarity in self–other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 816–830.

14.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2015). Ordinal—Regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2015.6–28. url: http://www.cran.r–project.org/package=ordinal/

15.

Del Giudice

, Angeleri

, & Manera

(2009). The juvenile transition: A developmental switch point in human life history. Developmental Review, 29, 1–31.

16.

Duck

S. W.

(1975). Personality similarity and friendship choices by adolescents. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 351–365.

17.

Edwards

J. R.

, & Parry

M. E.

(1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613.

18.

Edwards

J. R.

(2001). Ten difference score myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 265–287.

19.

Feld

, & Carter

W. C.

(1998). Foci of activity as changing contexts for friendship. In Adams

R. G.

, & Allan

(Eds.), Placing friendship in context (pp. 136–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Furnham

, & Chamorro–Premuzic

(2004). Personality, intelligence, and art. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 705–715.

21.

Harter

(1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York, US: Guilford Press.

22.

Hartup

W. W.

, & Stevens

(1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370.

23.

Haselager

G. J.

, Hartup

W. W.

, Lieshout

C. F.

, & Riksen–Walraven

J. M. A.

(1998). Similarities between friends and nonfriends in middle childhood. Child Development, 69, 1198–1208.

24.

Hosenfeld

, van den Boom

D. C.

, & Resing

W. C. M.

(1997). Constructing geometric analogies test for the longitudinal testing of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 367–372.

25.

Ilmarinen

V. J.

, Lönnqvist

J. E.

, & Paunonen

(2016). Similarity–attraction effects in friendship formation: Honest platoon–mates prefer each other but dishonest do not. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 153–158.

26.

Joffe

T. H.

(1997). Social pressures have selected for an extended juvenile period in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 593–605.

27.

Jokela

, Bleidorn

, Lamb

M. E.

, Gosling

S. D.

, & Rentfrow

P. J.

(2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 725–730.

28.

Jost

J. T.

, Glaser

, Sulloway

, & Kruglanski

A. W.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

29.

Kadushin

(2012). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings. New York, US: Oxford University Press.

30.

Kenny

D. A.

, Kashy

D. A.

, & Cook

W. L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, US: Guilford Press.

31.

Kupersmidt

J. B.

, DeRosier

M. E.

, & Patterson

C. P.

(1995). Similarity as the basis for children's friendships: The roles of sociometric status, aggressive and withdrawn behavior, academic achievement and demographic characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 439–452.

32.

Lee

, Ashton

M. C.

, Pozzebon

J. A.

, Visser

B. A.

, Bourdage

J. S.

, & Ogunfowora

(2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well–acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460–472.

33.

Logie

R. H.

, & Pearson

D. G.

(1997). The inner eye and theinner scribe of visuo–spatial working memory: Evidence from developmental fractionation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 241–257.

34.

Lönnqvist

J. E.

, & Itkonen

J. V.

(2016). Homogeneity of personal values and personality traits in Facebook social networks. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 24–35.

35.

Lönnqvist

J. E.

, Vainikainen

M. P.

, & Verkasalo

(2012). Teacher and parent ratings of seven–year–old children's personality and psychometrically assessed cognitive ability. European Journal of Personality, 26, 504–514.

36.

Lönnqvist

J. E.

, Verkasalo

, & Vainikainen

M. P.

(2011). Parent–teacher agreement on 7–year–old children's personality. European Journal of Personality, 25, 306–316.

37.

Malloy

T. E.

, Yarlas

, Montvilo

R. K.

, & Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). Agreement and accuracy in children's interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 692–702.

38.

McCrae

R. R.

(1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.

39.

McPherson

, Smith–Lovin

, & Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 415–444.

40.

Montoya

R. M.

, Horton

R. S.

, & Kirchner

(2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta–analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922.

41.

Montoya

R. M.

, & Horton

R. S.

(2014). A two–dimensional model for the study of interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 59–86.

42.

Moutafi

, Furnham

, & Crump

(2003). Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the NEO personality inventory and the Myers–Briggs type indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17, 79–94.

43.

Nestler

, Grimm

K. J.

, & Schönbrodt

F. D.

(2015). The social consequences and mechanisms of personality: How to analyse longitudinal data from individual, dyadic, round–robin and network designs. European Journal of Personality, 29, 272–295.

44.

Oishi

(2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 581–609.

45.

Parker

J. G.

, Rubin

K. H.

, Erath

S. A.

, Wojslawowicz

J. C.

, & Buskirk

A. A.

(2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment. A developmental psychopathology perspective. In Cicchetti

, & Cohen

D. J.

(Eds.), Developmental psychopathology. Theory and method (pp. 420–493). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley and Sons.

46.

Piaget

, & Inhelder

(1956). The child's conception of space. . (Translated from French by F. J. Langdon and J. L. Lunzer) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

47.

Rammstedt

, Danner

, & Martin

(2016). The association between personality and cognitive ability: Going beyond simple effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 62, 39–44.

48.

Rammstedt

, & John

O. P.

(2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10–item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.

49.

Reagor

P. A.

, & Clore

G. L.

(1970). Attraction, test anxiety, and similarity–dissimilarity of test performance. Psychonomic Science, 18, 219–220.

50.

Richardson

H. M.

(1939). Studies of mental resemblance between husbands and wives and between friends. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 104–120.

51.

Rose

A. J.

, & Rudolph

K. D.

(2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade–offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.

52.

Rubin

, Fredstrom

, & Bowker

(2008). Future directions in... Friendship in childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 17, 1085–1096.

53.

Schug

, Yuki

, Horikawa

, & Takemura

(2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross–societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95–103.

54.

Selfhout

, Burk

, Branje

, Denissen

, Van Aken

, & Meeus

(2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509–538.

55.

Senn

D. J.

(1971). Attraction as a function of similarity–dissimilarity in task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 120–123.

56.

Shanock

L. R.

, Baran

B. E.

, Gentry

W. A.

, Pattison

S. C.

, & Heggestad

E. D.

(2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554.

57.

Tesser

, Campbell

, & Smith

(1984). Friendship choice and performance: Self–evaluation maintenance in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 561–574.

58.

Trivers

R. L.

(1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1, 35–57.

59.

van Zalk

, & Denissen

(2015). Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self–view, perceived, and peer–view similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 121–141.

60.

Vigil

J. M.

(2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18, 143–161.

61.

Wolfradt

, & Pretz

J. E.

(2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310.