Behavioural Consistency within the Prisoner'S Dilemma Game: The Role of Personality and Situation

Abstract

Mixed–motive games represent situations that confront people with a conflict between cooperative and non–cooperative alternatives. Despite this common basis, recent research has shown that the consistency of people's choices across different mixed–motive games is rather low. The present research examined behavioural consistency within the same mixed–motive game, by presenting participants with a series of one–shot Prisoner's Dilemma Games. Across this set of games, payoffs were manipulated in order to intensify or weaken the conflict between self and the other party while maintaining the game's underlying structure. Our findings indicate that significant differences in choice behaviour are observed as a function of both situational (i.e. manipulations of the Prisoner's Dilemma Game's payoff structure) and personality differences (i.e. individual differences in personality and motivational traits). Moreover, our included situational variables and personality features did not interact with each other and were about equally impactful in shaping cooperation. Crucially, however, despite the significant behavioural differences across game variants, considerable consistency in choices was found as well, which suggests that the game's motivational basis reliably impacts choice behaviour in spite of situational and personality variations. We discuss implications for theorizing on mixed–motive situations and elaborate on the question how cooperation can be promoted. © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

Prisoner's Dilemma Game within-game consistency game variations personality person-situation debate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1981). Right–wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

Andreoni

, & Miller

(2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70, 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468–0262.00302.

Asbrock

, Sibley

C. G.

, & Duckitt

(2010). Right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340.

W. T.

, & Kwong

J. Y. Y.

(2004). Measurements and effects of social value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Suleiman

, Budescu

D. V.

, Fischer

, & Messick

D. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 71–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

W. T.

, Lu

, Leung

, Yam

, & Fung

J. M.

(2012). Risk and prisoner's dilemma: A reinterpretation of Coombs’ re–parameterization. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 476–490.

Axelrod

(1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

Balliet

, Parks

, & Joireman

(2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209105040.

Balliet

, & Van Lange

P. A. M.

(2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030939.

Bates

, Kliegl

, Vasishth

, & Baayen

(2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1506.04967.

10.

Bates

, Maechler

, Bolker

, & Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed–effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.

11.

Baumert

, Schlösser

, & Schmitt

(2014). Economic games: A performance–based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015–5759/a000183.

12.

Beckenkamp

, Hennig–Schmidt

, & Maier–Rigaud

F. P.

(2007). Cooperation in symmetric and asymmetric prisoner's dilemma games. MPI Collective Goods Preprint.

13.

Berkowitz

(1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 63–108.

14.

Blanco

, Engelmann

, & Normann

H. T.

(2010). A within–subject analysis of other–regarding preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 72, 321–338.

15.

Bogaert

, Boone

, & Declerck

(2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453–480.

16.

Brosig

, Riechmann

, & Weimann

(2007). Selfish in the end?: An investigation of consistency and stability of individual behavior. FEMM, Faculty of Economics and Management Magdeburg.

17.

Bruins

J. J.

, Liebrand

W. B. G.

, & Wilke

H. A. M.

(1989). About the saliency of fear and greed in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 155–161.

18.

Camerer

(2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: University Press.

19.

Campbell

W. K.

, Bonacci

A. M.

, Shelton

, Exline

J. J.

, & Bushman

B. J.

(2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self–report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04.

20.

Charness

, & Rabin

(2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–869.

21.

Coombs

C. H.

(1973). A reparameterization of the prisoner's dilemma game. Behavioral Science, 18, 424–428.

22.

Croson

R. T. A.

(1999). The disjunction effect and reason–based choice in games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2846.

23.

Dawes

R. M.

(1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 69–93.

24.

Dawes

R. M.

, & Messick

D. M.

(2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399402.

25.

Dawes

R. M.

, & Thaler

R. H.

(1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 187–197.

26.

De Cremer

, & Tyler

T. R.

(2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.92.3.639.

27.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual–process cognitive–motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 41–113), 33. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

28.

Duckitt

, & Sibley

C. G.

(2007). Right–wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614.

29.

Duriez

, & Van Hiel

(2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191–8869(01)00086–1.

30.

Eisenberg

, & Miller

P. A.

(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.

31.

Engelmann

, & Strobel

(2004). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review, 94, 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002741.

32.

Epstein

, & O'Brien

E. J.

(1985). The person–situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.98.3.513.

33.

Fehr

, & Schmidt

K. M.

(2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—Experimental evidence and new theories. In Kolm

S. C.

, & Ythier

J. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (pp. 615–691). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

34.

Fischbacher

, & Gächter

(2010). Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 100, 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.541.

35.

Fisman

, Kariv

, & Markovits

(2007). Individual preferences for giving. American Economic Review, 97, 1858–1877. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1858.

36.

Fleeson

(2001). Toward a structure– and process–integrated view of personality: Traits as distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.80.6.1011.

37.

Fleeson

(2007). Situation–based consistencies underlying trait–content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2007.00458.x.

38.

Fleeson

, & Noftle

E. E.

(2008). Where does personality have its influence? A supermatrix of consistency concepts. Journal of Personality, 76, 1355–1386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2008.00525.x.

39.

Furr

R. M.

, & Funder

D. C.

(2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable–centered, and person–centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2003.10.001.

40.

Gignac

G. E.

, & Szodorai

E. T.

(2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.

41.

Haesevoets

, Bostyn

, Reinders Folmer

, Roets

, & Van Hiel

(2018). Decision–making in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game: The effect of exit on cooperation and social welfare. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.

42.

Haesevoets

, Reinders Folmer

, & Van Hiel

(2015). Cooperation in mixed–motive games: The role of individual differences in selfish and social orientation. European Journal of Personality, 29, 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1992.

43.

Hardin

(2006). Trust. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

44.

Hilbig

B. E.

, & Zettler

(2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty–Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003.

45.

Hine

D. W.

, & Gifford

(1996). Individual restraint and group efficiency in commons dilemmas: The effects of two types of environmental uncertainty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 993–1009.

46.

Hui

F. K.

, Müller

, & Welsh

A. H.

(2016). Joint selection in mixed models using regularized PQL. Journal of the American Statistical Association.

47.

Kelley

H. H.

, & Thibaut

J. W.

(1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

48.

Kenrick

D. T.

, & Funder

D. C.

(1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person–situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.43.1.23.

49.

Kerr

N. L.

(1986). Motivational choices in task groups: A paradigm for social dilemma research. In Wilke

, Messick

D. M.

, & Rutte

C. G.

(Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 87–116). Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang.

50.

Kollock

(1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183.

51.

Komorita

S. S.

, & Parks

C. D.

(1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed–motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001151.

52.

Krekels

, & Pandelaere

(2015). Dispositional greed. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 225–230.

53.

Kuhlman

D. M.

, Brown

, & Teta

(1992). Cooperation, individualism, and competition as moderators of verbal and social orientation interpretations of cooperation and defection in social dilemmas. In Messick

, Wilke

, & Liebrand

W. B. G.

(Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 111–132). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

54.

Kuhlman

D. M.

, Camac

C. R.

, & Cunha

D. A.

(1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In Wilke

, Messick

, & Rutte

(Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 151–176). New York: Verlag.

55.

Kuhlman

D. M.

, & Marshello

A. F.

(1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.32.5.922.

56.

Kurzban

, & Houser

(2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15, S37–S52. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.420.

57.

Kuznetsova

, Brockhoff

P. B.

, & Christensen

R. H.

(2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26.

58.

Lave

L. B.

(1965). Factors affecting co–operation in the prisoner's dilemma. Behavioral Science, 10, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830100104.

59.

Leikas

, Lönnqvist

J. E.

, & Verkasalo

(2012). Persons, situations, and behaviors: Consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030385.

60.

Liebrand

W. B.

(1984). The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N–person multi–stage mixed–motive game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140302.

61.

Loewenstein

G. F.

, Thompson

, & Bazerman

M. H.

(1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426–441.

62.

Mandrik

C. A.

, & Bao

(2005). Exploring the concept and measurement of general risk aversion. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 531–539.

63.

Markóczy

(2004). Multiple motives behind single acts of co–operation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1018–1039.

64.

McClintock

C. G.

, & Liebrand

W. B.

(1988). Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.55.3.396.

65.

McFarland

S. G.

, Ageyev

V. S.

, & Djintcharadze

(1996). Russian authoritarianism two years after communism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296222010.

66.

McNeely

B. L.

, & Meglino

B. M.

(1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844.

67.

Messe

L. A.

, Dawson

J. E.

, & Lane

I. M.

(1973). Equity as a mediator of the effect of reward level on behavior in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 60–65.

68.

Messick

D. M.

, & Brewer

(1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In Wheeler

, & Shaver

(Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

69.

Messick

D. M.

, & McClintock

C. G.

(1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022–1031(68)90046–2.

70.

Messick

D. M.

, & Sentis

(1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick

D. M.

, & Cook

K. S.

(Eds.), Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives (pp. 61–94). New York: Praeger.

71.

Molm

L. D.

, Takahashi

, & Peterson

(2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 396–1427.

72.

Murphy

R. O.

, Ackermann

K. A.

, & Handgraaf

M. J. J.

(2011). Measuring social value orientation (SVO). Judgment and Decision making, 6, 771–781.

73.

Nakagawa

, & Schielzeth

(2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R² from generalized linear mixed–effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041–210x.2012.00261.x.

74.

Naumann

S. E.

, Minsky

B. D.

, & Sturman

M. C.

(2002). The use of the concept “entitlement” in management literature: A historical review, synthesis, and discussion of compensation policy implications. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 145–166.

75.

Parks

C. D.

, & Hulbert

L. G.

(1995). High and low trusters’ responses to fear in a payoff matrix. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 718–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002795039004006.

76.

Paulhus

D. L.

, & Williams

K. M.

(2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092–6566(02)00505–6.

77.

Pepitone

(1971). The role of justice in interdependent decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 144–156.

78.

Peterson

B. E.

, Doty

R. M.

, & Winter

D. G.

(1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293192006.

79.

Pletzer

J. L.

, Balliet

, Joireman

, Kuhlman

D. M.

, Voelpel

S. C.

, & Van Lange

P. A.

(2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2139.

80.

Pratto

, Sidanius

, Stallworth

, & Malle

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.67.4.741.

81.

Qualls

W. J.

, & Puto

C. P.

(1989). Organizational climate and decision framing: An integrated approach to analyzing industrial buying decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 179–192.

82.

R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing URL http://www.R–project.org.

83.

Rapoport

(1967). A note on the “index of cooperation” for prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 101–103.

84.

Rapoport

, & Chammah

(1965). Prisoner's dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.20269.

85.

Romer

, Gruder

C. L.

, & Lizzadro

(1986). A person–situation approach to altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1001–1012.

86.

Roth

A. E.

, & Murnighan

J. K.

(1978). Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022–2496(78)90030–5.

87.

Rowe

(1987). Resolving the person–situation debate: Invitation to an interdisciplinary dialogue. American Psychologist, 42, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.42.3.218.

88.

Rushton

J. P.

(1980). Altruism, socialization, and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.

89.

Rushton

J. P.

, Chrisjohn

R. D.

, & Fekken

G. C.

(1981). The altruistic personality and the self–report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191–8869(81)90084–2.

90.

Sabater–Grande

, & Georgantzis

(2002). Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners’ dilemma games: An experimental test. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48, 37–50.

91.

Sally

(1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463195007001004.

92.

Samuelson

C. D.

(1993). A multiattribute evaluation approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 298–324.

93.

Schmitt

, Gollwitzer

, Maes

, & Arbach

(2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.

94.

Schopler

, Insko

C. A.

, Wieselquist

, Pemberton

, Witcher

, Kozar

, … Wildschut

(2001). When groups are more competitive than individuals: The domain of the discontinuity effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 632–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.80.4.632.

95.

Schultz

P. W.

, & Stone

W. F.

(1994). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward the environment. Environment and Behavior, 26, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916594261002.

96.

Selenta

, & Lord

R. G.

(2005). Development of the levels of self–concept scale: Measuring the individual, relational, and collective levels. Working paper, University of Akron.

97.

Sheposh

J. P.

, & Gallo

P. S.

(1973). Asymmetry of payoff structure and cooperative behavior in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277301700208.

98.

Sherman

R. A.

, Nave

C. S.

, & Funder

D. C.

(2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019796.

99.

Sherman

R. A.

, Rauthmann

J. F.

, Brown

N. A.

, Serfass

D. G.

, & Jones

A. B.

(2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real–time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000036.

100.

Sibley

C. G.

, & Duckitt

(2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one–year longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365364.

101.

Simpson

(2003). Sex, fear, and greed: A social dilemma analysis of gender and cooperation. Social Forces, 82, 35–52.

102.

Simpson

(2006). Social identity and cooperation in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 18, 443–470.

103.

Snow

J. N.

, Kern

R. M.

, & Curlette

W. L.

(2001). Identifying personality traits associated with attrition in systematic training for effective parenting groups. The Family Journal, 9, 102–108.

104.

Snyder

, & Cantor

(1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In Gilbert

, Fiske

, & Lindzey

(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 635–679). Boston: McGraw–Hill.

105.

Solomon

, & Kendall

A. J.

(1979). Children in classrooms. NY: Praeger.

106.

Stouten

, De Cremer

, & Van Dijk

(2005). All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 767–783.

107.

Tazelaar

M. J. A.

, Van Lange

P. A. M.

, & Ouwerkerk

J. W.

(2004). How to cope with “noise” in social dilemmas: The benefits of communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.87.6.845.

108.

Thibaut

J. W.

, & Kelley

H. H.

(1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

109.

Thielmann

, & Böhm

(2016). Who does (not) participate in intergroup conflict? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616660160.

110.

Thielmann

, Böhm

, & Hilbig

B. E.

(2015). Different games for different motives: Comment on Haesevoets, Folmer, and Van Hiel (2015). European Journal of Personality, 29, 506–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2007.

111.

Thielmann

, Hilbig

B. E.

, & Niedtfeld

(2014). Willing to give but not to forgive: Borderline personality features and cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_135.

112.

Unger

L. S.

(1991). Altruism as a motivation to volunteer. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 71–100.

113.

Van Hiel

, & Duriez

(2001). Een meetinstrument voor individuele verschillen in sociale dominantie oriëntatie. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 57, 114–116.

114.

Van Hiel

, Vanneste

, & De Cremer

(2008). Why did they claim too much? The role of causal attributions in explaining level of cooperation in commons and anticommons dilemmas. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 173–197.

115.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: The integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.77.2.337.

116.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

, Bekkers

, Chirumbolo

, & Leone

(2012). Are conservatives less likely to be prosocial than liberals? From games to ideology, political preferences and voting. European Journal of Personality, 26, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.845.

117.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

, De Cremer

, Van Dijk

, & Van Vugt

(2007). Self–interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction. In Kruglanski

A. W.

, & Higgings

E. T.

(Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 540–561). New York: Guilford.

118.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

, & Joireman

(2008). How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751–2409.2008.00013.x.

119.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

, Joireman

, Parks

C. D.

, & Van Dijk

(2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003.

120.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

, & Visser

(1999). Locomotion in social dilemmas: How people adapt to cooperative, tit–for–tat, and noncooperative partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 762–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.77.4.762.

121.

Weber

, Kopelman

, & Messick

(2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying the logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4.

122.

Wiernik

B. M.

(2017). Open psychometric meta–analysis [computer software]. Version 1.0b9

123.

Wiggins

J. S.

(2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford.

124.

Xie

, Yu

, Chen

, & Chen

X. P.

(2006). The measurement of cooperative and competitive personality. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 116–125.

125.

Yamagishi

(1988). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 265–271. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786924.

126.

Yamagishi

, Horita

, Mifune

, Hahimoto

, Li

, Shinada

, Miura

, … Simunovic

(2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109, 20364–20368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212126109.

127.

Yamagishi

, Mifune

, Li

, Shinada

, Hashimoto

, Horita

, Miura

, … Simunovic

(2013). Is behavioral pro–sociality game specific? Pro–social preference and expectations of pro–sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.002.

128.

Zhao

, Ferguson

, & Smillie

L. D.

(2016). Prosocial personality traits differentially predict egalitarianism, generosity, and reciprocity in economic games. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1137.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.83 MB