Openness/Intellect and Susceptibility to Pseudo–Profound Bullshit: A Replication and Extension

Abstract

‘Pseudo–profound bullshit’ (PPBS) is a class of meaningless statements designed to appear profound. Profundity ratings for PPBS have been found to be negatively related to analytical thinking and positively related to epistemically suspect beliefs (e.g. belief in the paranormal). Conceptually similar traits within the Openness/Intellect (O/I) domain form a simplex, whereby traits are arranged along a single dimension from intelligence to apophenia (i.e. observing patterns or causal connections were none exist). Across two studies (total N = 297), we attempted to replicate the O/I simplex and determine how it relates to perceiving PPBS as profound. Participants completed questionnaires measuring traits from the O/I simplex and provided profundity ratings for PPBS. Profundity ratings of PPBS tended to correlate negatively with intelligence and positively with apophenia. The association with intelligence generally reflected a greater ability to discriminate the profound from the pseudo–profound, whereas the association with apophenia reflected poorer discrimination in Study 1, with less conclusive results in Study 2. In both studies, the O/I simplex was closely replicated. The results suggest a link between the O/I domain and perceiving PPBS as profound and tentatively support the theory that intelligence may protect against apophenia. © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

Openness/Intellect pseudo-profound bullshit simplex apophenia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

P. L.

, & Heggestad

E. D.

(1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033–2909.121.2.219.

Busing

, Commandeur

J. J.

, Heiser

W. J.

, Bandilla

, & Faulbaum

(1997). PROXSCAL: A multidimensional scaling program for individual differences scaling with constraints. Softstat, 97, 67–74.

Chopra

(2008–2018). Deepak Chopra. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/deepakchopra

Condon

D. M.

, & Revelle

(2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: Development and initial validation of a public–domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004.

Costa

P. T.

, & MacCrae

R. R.

(1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO five–factor inventory (NEO–FFI): Professional manual: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dalton

(2016). Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on “On the reception and detection of pseudo–profound bullshit”. Judgment and Decision making, 11, 121–122.

Dennett

D. C.

(2014). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2011). Intelligence and personality. In Sternberg

R. J.

& Kaufman

S. B.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 711–737). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.036.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2015). Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences. (pp. 369–399). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, https://doi.org/10.1037/14343–017.

10.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Carey

B. E.

, Krueger

R. F.

, & Ross

S. R.

(2016). Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM–5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000170.

11.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Grazioplene

R. G.

, & Peterson

J. B.

(2012). From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003.

12.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Quilty

L. C.

, & Peterson

J. B.

(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880.

13.

Eckblad

, & Chapman

L. J.

(1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–006X.51.2.215.

14.

Fraley

R. C.

, & Marks

M. J.

(2007). The null hypothesis significance testing debate and its implications for personality research. In Robins

R. W.

, Fraley

R. C.

, & Krueger

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 149–169). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

15.

Frankfurt

H. G.

(1986). On bullshit. Raritan: A Quarterly Review, 6, 81–100.

16.

Frankfurt

H. G.

(2005). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

17.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big–five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.59.6.1216.

18.

Graham

J. W.

, Olchowski

A. E.

, & Gilreath

T. D.

(2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121–007–0070–9.

19.

Green

D. M.

, & Swets

J. A.

(1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford, England: John Wiley.

20.

Guttman

(1945). A basis for analyzing test–retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288892.

21.

Hautus

M. J.

(1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203619.

22.

Horn

J. L.

(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289447.

23.

Jackson

P. H.

, & Agunwamba

C. C.

(1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non–homogeneous items: I: Algebraic lower bounds. Psychometrika, 42, 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02295979.

24.

Johnson

J. A.

(2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120–item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP–NEO–120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003.

25.

Jost

J. T.

, Glaser

, Kruglanski

A. W.

, & Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. In: American Psychological Association.

26.

Kruskal

J. B.

(1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289565.

27.

Kwapil

T. R.

, Barrantes–Vidal

, & Silvia

P. J.

(2008). The dimensional structure of the Wisconsin schizotypy scales: Factor identification and construct validity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbm098.

28.

Lindeman

, & Aarnio

(2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009.

29.

Lobato

, Mendoza

, Sims

, & Chin

(2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042.

30.

Markon

K. E.

, Krueger

R. F.

, & Watson

(2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.88.1.139.

31.

McDonald

R. P.

(1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: “Domain validity and generalizability” 1. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800111.

32.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

33.

Miller

, Byrne

, Hodges

, Lawrie

S. M.

, Owens

D. G. C.

, & Johnstone

E. C.

(2002). Schizotypal components in people at high risk of developing schizophrenia: Early findings from the Edinburgh High–Risk Study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.2.179.

34.

Nettle

(2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.61.6.622.

35.

Norman

(2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459–010–9222–y.

36.

Pacini

, & Epstein

(1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio–bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.76.6.972.

37.

Pearce

(n.d.). New age bullshit generator. Retrieved from http://sebpearce.com/bullshit/

38.

Pennycook

, Cheyne

J. A.

, Barr

, Koehler

D. J.

, & Fugelsang

J. A.

(2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo–profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision making, 10, 549–563.

39.

Pennycook

, Cheyne

J. A.

, Barr

, Koehler

D. J.

, & Fugelsang

J. A.

(2016). It's still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016). Judgment and Decision making, 11, 123.

40.

Raghunathan

T. E.

, Lepkowski

J. M.

, Van Hoewyk

, & Solenberger

(2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27, 85–96.

41.

Revelle

(1979). Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1401_4.

42.

Revelle

(2017). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Retrieved from https://CRAN.R–projects.org/package=psych.

43.

Revelle

, & Zinbarg

R. E.

(2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 10–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336–008–9102–z.

44.

RStudio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated development for R (version 1.0.136). Boston, MA: RStudio. Retrieved from http://rstudio.com/

45.

Snodgrass

J. G.

, & Corwin

(1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096–3445.117.1.34.

46.

Soto

C. J.

, & John

O. P.

(2016). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI–2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 27–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096.

47.

Stanislaw

, & Todorov

(1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207704.

48.

Sternberg

(1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089–2680.3.4.292.

49.

Sturrock

, & Rocha

(2000). A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table. Field Methods, 12, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0001200104.

50.

Toplak

M. E.

, West

R. F.

, & Stanovich

K. E.

(2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729.

51.

Van Hiel

, Onraet

, & De Pauw

(2010). The relationship between social–cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta–analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78, 1765–1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00669.x.

52.

Vollema

M. G.

, & van den Bosch

R. J.

(1995). The multidimensionality of schizotypy. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/21.1.19.

53.

Westfall

, Kenny

D. A.

, & Judd

C. M.

(2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014.

54.

Williamson

(2012). Wisdom of Chopra. Retrieved from http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php