BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF. M., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., SchönbrodtF. D., … WrzusC. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.811.
2.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., CostantiniG., … WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115.
GeukesK., van ZalkM. H. W., & BackM. D. (2018). Understanding personality development: An integrative state process model. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 53–51. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0165025416677847
7.
MertonR. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1942).
8.
MõttusR. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041.
9.
MõttusR., & KandlerC. (2018). Causality is hard, but no cause for concern. European Journal of Personality, 32, 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2154.
10.
PincusA. L., HopwoodC. J., & WrightA. G. C. (in press). The interpersonal situation: An integrative framework for the study of personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. In RauthmannJ. F., FunderD., & ShermanR. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Psychological Situations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
RobertsB. W. (2018). A revised sociogenomic model of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12323.
12.
VazireS. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884.
13.
WrzusC., & RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality and development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316652279.