BackM. D. (2018). Editorial: Continued quality, openness, and curiosity at the European Journal of Personality. European Journal of Personality, 32, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2141.
3.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., CostantiniG., … WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115.
4.
FurrR. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.724.
5.
HopwoodC. J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32, 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2155.
6.
LievensF. (2017). Assessing personality–situation interplay in personnel selection: Toward more integration into personality research. European Journal of Personality, 31, 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2111.
7.
MabbeE., VansteenkisteM., Van der Kaap–DeederJ., DielemanL., MouratidisA., & SoenensB. (2018). The role of child personality in effects of psychologically controlling parenting: An examination at the level of daily fluctuations. European Journal of Personality, 32, 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2156.
8.
MõttusR., & KandlerC. (2018). Editorial: Causality is hard, but no cause for concern. European Journal of Personality, 32, 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2154.
9.
SimonsD. J., ShodaY., & LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630.
10.
VazireS. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884.