Cognitive Flexibility and Pro–Environmental Behaviour: A Multimethod Approach

Abstract

While cognitive flexibility has been hypothesized to relate to adaptive, long–term–oriented behaviour, empirical support for such a relationship is scarce. In the present article, we examine the role of cognitive flexibility as a correlate of long–term–oriented behaviour in the domain of environmental conservation. In a first study (N = 143), we explored potential associations between multiple self–report scales and performance–based measures of cognitive flexibility and pro–environmental behaviour. Based on its results, we conducted a pre–registered confirmatory study (N = 264) focusing on the most promising correlations found in our exploratory study. This study generated conclusive support for a positive medium–sized correlation between cognitive flexibility and pro–environmental behaviour. Exploratory hierarchical regression analyses further revealed that cognitive flexibility accounted for a small portion of variance in pro–environmental behaviour above and beyond the Big Five. While appearing robust on the level of self–reports, the relationship between cognitive flexibility and pro–environmental behaviour did not reliably extend to the level of performance tasks, possibly because of their relatively specific scope. These results illustrate the contribution of cognitive flexibility to understanding individual differences in long–term–oriented, pro–environmental behaviour. © 2019 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

cognitive flexibility pro-environmental behaviour executive functioning self-regulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

P. L.

, & Heggestad

E. D.

(1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.121.2.219.

Albers

, & Lakens

(2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow–up bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004.

Altamirano

L. J.

, Miyake

, & Whitmer

A. J.

(2010). When mental inflexibility facilitates executive control: Beneficial side effects of ruminative tendencies on goal maintenance. Psychological Science, 21, 1377–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610381505.

Arnold

, Kibbe

, Hartig

, & Kaiser

F. G.

(2018). Capturing the environmental impact of individual lifestyles: Evidence of the criterion validity of the general ecological behavior scale. Environment and Behavior, 50, 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517701796.

Arrington

C. M.

, & Rhodes

K. M.

(2010). Perceptual asymmetries influence task choice: The effect of lateralised presentation of hierarchical stimuli. Laterality, 15, 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500902984695.

Bamberg

(2006). Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people's travel behavior? Results from a theory–driven intervention study. Environment and Behavior, 38, 820–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505285091.

Barceló

(2003). The Madrid card sorting test (MCST): A task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event–related potentials. Brain Research Protocols, 11, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385–299X(03)00013–8.

Berg

E. A.

(1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. The Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159.

Bolte

, Goschke

(2010) Thinking and emotion: Affective modulation of cognitive processing modes. In Glatzeder

, Goel

, & Müller

Eds., Towards a theory of thinking. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–642–03129–8_18.

10.

Brick

, & Lewis

G. J.

(2016). Unearthing the “green” personality: Core traits predict environmentally friendly behavior. Environment and Behavior, 48, 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514554695.

11.

Busic–Sontic

, Czap

N. V.

, & Fuerst

(2017). The role of personality traits in green decision–making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.012.

12.

Carlson

S. M.

, & Wang

T. S.

(2007). Inhibitory control and emotion regulation in preschool children. Cognitive Development, 22, 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.08.002.

13.

Chao

Y. L.

, & Lam

S. P.

(2011). Measuring responsible environmental behavior: Self–reported and other–reported measures and their differences in testing a behavioral model. Environment and Behavior, 43, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509350849.

14.

Christensen

A. P.

, Kenett

Y. N.

, Cotter

K. N.

, Beaty

R. E.

, & Silvia

P. J.

(2018). Remotely close associations: Openness to experience and semantic memory structure. European Journal of Personality, 32, 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2157.

15.

Cornelissen

, Pandelaere

, Warlop

, & Dewitte

(2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002.

16.

Costa

P. T.

, & McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040–3590.4.1.5.

17.

Cyders

M. A.

, & Coskunpinar

(2011). Measurement of constructs using self–report and behavioral lab tasks: Is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity? Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 965–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.001.

18.

Cyders

M. A.

, & Coskunpinar

(2012). The relationship between self–report and lab task conceptualizations of impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.005.

19.

de Ridder

, Lensvelt–Mulders

, Finkenauer

, Stok

, & Baumeister

R. F.

(2012). Taking stock of self–control: A meta–analysis of how self–control affects a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749.

20.

Dennis

J. P.

, & Vander Wal

J. S.

(2010). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608–009–9276–4.

21.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Peterson

J. B.

, & Higgins

D. M.

(2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2005.00330.x.

22.

Diamond

(2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–psych–113011–143750.

23.

Dias

, Robbins

T. W.

, & Roberts

A. C.

(1997). Dissociable forms of inhibitory control within prefrontal cortex with an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: Restriction to novel situations and independence from “on–line” processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 9285–9297. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17–23–09285.1997.

24.

Dohle

, Diel

, & Hofmann

(2018). Executive functions and the self–regulation of eating behavior: A review. Appetite, 124, 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.041.

25.

Dreisbach

, & Fröber

(2019). On how to be flexible (or not): Modulation of the stability–flexibility balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 3–9.

26.

Duckworth

A. L.

, Gendler

T. S.

, & Gross

J. J.

(2016). Situational strategies for self–control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247.

27.

Ersche

K. D.

, Lim

T. V.

, Ward

L. H.

, Robbins

T. W.

, & Stochl

(2017). Creature of habit: A self–report measure of habitual routines and automatic tendencies in everyday life. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.024.

28.

Faul

, Erdfelder

, Lang

A. G.

, & Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

29.

Fleming

K. A.

, Heintzelman

S. J.

, & Bartholow

B. D.

(2016). Specifying associations between conscientiousness and executive functioning: Mental set shifting, not prepotent response inhibition or working memory updating. Journal of Personality, 84, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12163.

30.

Friedman

N. P.

, & Miyake

(2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent–variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096–3445.133.1.101.

31.

Friedman

N. P.

, & Miyake

(2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023.

32.

Friedman

N. P.

, Miyake

, Altamirano

L. J.

, Corley

R. P.

, Young

S. E.

, Rhea

S. A.

, & Hewitt

J. K.

(2016). Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology, 52, 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000075.

33.

Friedman

N. P.

, Miyake

, Corley

R. P.

, Young

S. E.

, DeFries

J. C.

, & Hewitt

J. K.

(2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01681.x.

34.

Friedman

N. P.

, Miyake

, Young

S. E.

, DeFries

J. C.

, Corley

R. P.

, & Hewitt

J. K.

(2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096–3445.137.2.201.

35.

Gamboz

, Borella

, & Brandimonte

M. A.

(2009). The role of switching, inhibition and working memory in older adults’ performance in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16, 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580802573045.

36.

Gifford

(2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–psych–010213–115048.

37.

Grant

D. A.

, & Berg

E. A.

(1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl–type card–sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059831.

38.

Hazy

T. E.

, Frank

M. J.

, & O'Reilly

R. C.

(2007). Towards an executive without a homunculus: Computational models of the prefrontal cortex/basal ganglia system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362, 1601–1613. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2055.

39.

Heaton

R. K.

, Chelune

G. J.

, Talley

J. L.

, Kay

G. G.

, & Curtiss

(1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

40.

Hilbig

B. E.

, Zettler

, Moshagen

, & Heydasch

(2013). Tracing the path from personality—via cooperativeness—to conservation. European Journal of Personality, 27, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1856.

41.

Hofmann

, Friese

, & Strack

(2009). Impulse and self–control from a dual–systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–6924.2009.01116.x.

42.

Hofmann

, Schmeichel

B. J.

, & Baddeley

A. D.

(2012). Executive functions and self–regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006.

43.

Hommel

(2015). Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. In Elliot

A. J.

(Ed.), Advances in motivation science (pp. 33–67), 2. Waltham: Elsevier.

44.

Hotelling

, & Pabst

M. R.

(1936). Rank correlation and tests of significance involving no assumption of normality. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 7, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732543.

45.

Ionescu

(2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001.

46.

Ito

T. A.

, Friedman

N. P.

, Bartholow

B. D.

, Correll

, Loersch

, Altamirano

L. J.

, & Miyake

(2015). Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038557.

47.

Jackson

D. N.

(1967). Manual for the Personality Research Form. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.

48.

Johnco

, Wuthrich

V. M.

, & Rapee

R. M.

(2014). Reliability and validity of two self–report measures of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1381–1387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038009.

49.

Joireman

(2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In Strathman

, & Joireman

(Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, and application (pp. 289–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

50.

Kaiser

F. G.

(1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.1998.tb01712.x.

51.

Kaiser

F. G.

, Merten

, & Wetzel

(2018). How do we know we are measuring environmental attitude? Specific objectivity as the formal validation criterion for measures of latent attributes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.003.

52.

Kaiser

F. G.

, & Wilson

(2004). Goal–directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003.

53.

Kaplan

, & Berman

M. G.

(2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self–regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784.

54.

Kelly

S. M.

, & Updegraff

J. A.

(2017). Substituting activities mediates the effect of cognitive flexibility on physical activity: A daily diary study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865–017–9839–x.

55.

Kiesel

, Steinhauser

, Wendt

, Falkenstein

, Jost

, Philipp

A. M.

, & Koch

(2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842.

56.

Klein

S. A.

, Heck

D. W.

, Reese

, & Hilbig

B. E.

(2019). On the relationship between Openness to Experience, political orientation, and pro–environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.017.

57.

Klein

S. A.

, Hilbig

B. E.

, & Heck

D. W.

(2017). Which is the greater good? A social dilemma paradigm disentangling environmentalism and cooperation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.001.

58.

Kormos

, & Gifford

(2014). The validity of self–report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta–analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003.

59.

Kotabe

H. P.

, & Hofmann

(2015). On integrating the components of self–control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382.

60.

Lange

, Brückner

, Kröger

, Beller

, & Eggert

(2014). Wasting ways: Perceived distance to the recycling facilities predicts pro–environmental behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.008.

61.

Lange

, Kip

, Klein

, Mueller

, Seer

, & Kopp

(2018). Effects of rule uncertainty on cognitive flexibility in a card–sorting paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 190, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.07.002.

62.

Lange

, Kröger

, Steinke

, Seer

, Dengler

, & Kopp

(2016). Decomposing card–sorting performance: Effects of working memory load and age–related changes. Neuropsychology, 30, 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000271.

63.

Lange

, Seer

, Finke

, Dengler

, & Kopp

(2015). Dual routes to cortical orienting responses: Novelty detection and uncertainty reduction. Biological Psychology, 105, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.01.001.

64.

Lange

, Seer

, & Kopp

(2017). Cognitive flexibility in neurological disorders: Cognitive components and event–related potentials. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.011.

65.

Lange

, Steinke

, & Dewitte

(2018). The Pro–environmental Behavior Task: A laboratory measure of actual pro–environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.007.

66.

Larson

L. R.

, Stedman

R. C.

, Cooper

C. B.

, & Decker

D. J.

(2015). Understanding the multi–dimensional structure of pro–environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004.

67.

Lee

, Ashton

M. C.

, Choi

, & Zachariassen

(2015). Connectedness to nature and to humanity: Their association and personality correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1003.

68.

Lehman

P. K.

, & Geller

E. S.

(2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 13–32.

69.

Logue

S. F.

, & Gould

T. J.

(2014). The neural and genetic basis of executive function: Attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 123, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.08.007.

70.

Lounes

, Khan

, & Tchanturia

(2011). Assessment of cognitive flexibility in anorexia nervosa–self–report or experimental measure? A brief report. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 925–928. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000671.

71.

Markle

G. L.

(2013). Pro–environmental behavior: Does it matter how it's measured? Development and validation of the Pro–Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS). Human Ecology, 41, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745–013–9614–8.

72.

Markowitz

E. M.

, Goldberg

L. R.

, Ashton

M. C.

, & Lee

(2012). Profiling the “pro–environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00721.x.

73.

Martin

M. M.

, & Rubin

R. B.

(1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623–626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623.

74.

Mathôt

, Schreij

, & Theeuwes

(2012). OpenSesame: An open–source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428–011–0168–7.

75.

Mayer

, & Geller

E. S.

(1982)–1983). Motivating energy efficient travel: A community–based intervention for encouraging biking. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.2190/C9H7–6ULX–W52K–HW2D.

76.

Mayr

, & Bell

(2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task–switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17, 774–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01781.x.

77.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

(1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Hogan

& Johnson

Eds., Handbook of personality psychology. 825–847. San Diego: Academic Press, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–012134645–4/50032–9.

78.

Meleady

, Abrams

, Van de Vyver

, Hopthrow

, Mahmood

, Player

, … Leite

A. C.

(2017). Surveillance or self–surveillance? Behavioral cues can increase the rate of drivers’ pro–environmental behavior at a long wait stop. Environment and Behavior, 49, 1156–1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517691324.

79.

Milner

(1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting: The role of the frontal lobes. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1963.00460070100010.

80.

Miyake

, Friedman

N. P.

, Emerson

M. J.

, Witzki

A. H.

, Howerter

, & Wager

T. D.

(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.

81.

Murdock

K. W.

, Oddi

K. B.

, & Bridgett

D. J.

(2013). Cognitive correlates of personality: Links between executive functioning and the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001/a000104.

82.

Murtagh

, Gatersleben

, Cowen

, & Uzzell

(2015). Does perception of automation undermine pro–environmental behaviour? Findings from three everyday settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.002.

83.

Nigg

J. T.

(2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.126.2.220.

84.

Odacı

, & Cikrikci

Ö.

(2018). Cognitive flexibility mediates the relationship between Big Five personality traits and life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482–018–9651–y.

85.

Ojedokun

(2018). Associations of the five–factor personality traits with environmental citizenship behavior of youth in a Nigerian university community. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29, 1135–1155. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ–02–2018–0040.

86.

Osbaldiston

, & Schott

J. P.

(2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta–analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673.

87.

Poškus

M. S.

(2018). Personality and pro–environmental behaviour. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 72, 669–670.

88.

Rachlin

(2000). The science of self–control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

89.

Reineberg

A. E.

, Andrews–Hanna

J. R.

, Depue

B. E.

, Friedman

N. P.

, & Banich

M. T.

(2015). Resting–state networks predict individual differences in common and specific aspects of executive function. NeuroImage, 104, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.045.

90.

Rhodes

M. G.

(2004). Age–related differences in performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A meta–analytic review. Psychology and Aging, 19, 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.19.3.482.

91.

Ripple

W. J.

, Wolf

, Newsome

T. M.

, Galetti

, Alamgir

, Crist

, … 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. Bioscience, 67, 1026–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125.

92.

Roth

R. M.

, Isquith

P. K.

, & Gioia

G. A.

(2005). Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Adult version. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

93.

Saleem

M. A.

, Eagle

, & Low

(2018). Climate change behaviors related to purchase and use of personal cars: Development and validation of eco–socially conscious consumer behavior scale. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.023.

94.

Schönbrodt

F. D.

, & Perugini

(2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009.

95.

Schultz

P. W.

, Gouveia

V. V.

, Cameron

L. D.

, Tankha

, Schmuck

, & Franěk

(2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 36, 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962.

96.

Seebauer

, Fleiß

, & Schweighart

(2017). A household is not a person: Consistency Fpof pro–environmental behavior in adult couples and the accuracy of proxy–reports. Environment and Behavior, 49, 603–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516663796.

97.

Skinner

B. F.

(1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

98.

Steg

, & Vlek

(2009). Encouraging pro–environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.

99.

Stern

P. C.

(1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.001413.

100.

Stern

P. C.

(2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022–4537.00175.

101.

Sunstein

C. R.

, & Reisch

L. A.

(2014). Automatically green: Behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38, 127–158.

102.

Swim

J. K.

, Clayton

, & Howard

G. S.

(2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change: Psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023472.

103.

Tarditi

, Hahnel

U. J.

, Jeanmonod

, Sander

, & Brosch

(2018). Affective dilemmas: The impact of trait affect and state emotion on sustainable consumption decisions in a social dilemma task. Environment and Behavior Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518787590 001391651878759.

104.

Terrier

, Kim

, & Fernandez

(2016). Who are the good organizational citizens for the environment? An examination of the predictive validity of personality traits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.005.

105.

Trafimow

(2015). A defense against the alleged unreliability of difference scores. Cogent Mathematics, 2(), 1064626. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311835.2015.1064626.

106.

Van der Linden

, Maibach

, & Leiserowitz

(2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516.

107.

Vandierendonck

, Liefooghe

, & Verbruggen

(2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791.

108.

Weigel

R. H.

, & Newman

L. S.

(1976). Increasing attitude–behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.33.6.793.

109.

Wilson

E. O.

(1988). The current state of biological diversity. Biodiversity, 521, 3–18.

110.

Wynes

, & Nicholas

K. A.

(2017). The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748–9326/aa7541.

111.

Yehene

, & Meiran

(2007). Is there a general task switching ability? Acta Psychologica, 126, 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.007.

112.

Zelazo

P. D.

(2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort: A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1, 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.46.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.43 MB

0.82 MB