When Good Feelings Turn Mixed: Affective Dynamics and Big Five Trait Predictors of Mixed Emotions in Daily Life

Abstract

In this study, we examine how daily life fluctuations in positive affect (PA) and negative afect (NA) relate to mixed emotions—that is, simultaneous positive and negative feelings. We utilised three experience sampling studies (total N = 275), in which participants reported their affect 10 times each day for up to 14 days. Because people generally experience fairly stable moderate levels of PA in daily life, we proposed that mixed emotions would typically occur when NA increases and overlaps with, but does not entirely eliminate, PA. Accordingly, within individuals, we found that mixed emotions in daily life were more strongly predicted by changes in NA and the occurrence of negative events than by changes in PA and positive events. At the between–person level, individuals with more variable NA, more stable PA, and higher trait Neuroticism scores experienced higher average levels of mixed emotions. Further, we found evidence that the average magnitude of NA increases may partially mediate the association between Neuroticism and mixed emotions. We also found that positive predictors of mixed emotions are negative predictors of individuals’ within–person PA/NA correlations—that is, affective synchrony. Our findings elucidate trait predictors and affective dynamics of daily life mixed emotions, which appear closely intertwined with NA variability. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

mixed emotions Big Five emotion dynamics experience sampling negative affect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asparouhov

, & Muthén

(2019). Latent variable centering of predictors and mediators in multilevel and time–series models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1511375.

Barford

, & Smillie

L. D.

(2016). Openness and other Big Five traits in relation to dispositional mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.002.

Barford

K. A.

(2018). Personality processes of mixed emotions: Describing, measuring, and explaining variation in dispositional, daily life, and experimentally elicited mixed emotions. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Melbourne. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/213943

Barford

K. A.

, Fayn

, Silvia

P. J.

, & Smillie

L. D.

(2018). Individual differences in conflicting stimulus evaluations: Openness/intellect predicts mixed–valenced appraisals of visual art. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.006.

Barrett

L. F.

, & Bliss–Moreau

(2009). Affect as a psychological primitive. In Zanna

M. P.

& Olson

J. M.

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 167–218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S005–2601(08)00404–8

Berrios

, Totterdell

, & Kellett

(2015). Eliciting mixed emotions: A meta–analysis comparing models, types, and measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00428.

Berrios

, Totterdell

, & Kellett

(2018). When feeling mixed can be meaningful: The relation between mixed emotions and eudaimonic well–being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1090.

Bolger

, & Laurenceau

J. P.

(2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bolger

, & Zuckerman

(1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.69.5.890.

10.

Brehm

J. W.

, & Miron

A. M.

(2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031–006–9007–z.

11.

Conner

T. S.

, & Barrett

L. F.

(2012). Trends in ambulatory self–report: The role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182546f18.

12.

Credé

, Harms

, Niehorster

, & Gaye–Valentine

(2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403.

13.

de Haan–Rietdijk

, Völkle

M. C.

, Keijsers

, & Hamaker

E. L.

(2017). Discrete–vs. continuous–time modeling of unequally spaced experience sampling method data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01849.

14.

Dejonckheere

, Mestdagh

, Houben

, Erbas

, Pe

, Koval

, … Kuppens

(2018). The bipolarity of affect and depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000186.

15.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2014). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In Larsen

R. J.

& Cooper

M. L.

(Eds.), The APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 3: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 369–399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14343–017.

16.

Diener

, & Diener

(1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.1996.tb00354.x.

17.

Diener

, & Iran–Nejad

(1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.

18.

Diener

, Kanazawa

, Suh

E. M.

, & Oishi

(2015). Why people are in a generally good mood. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544467.

19.

Driver

C. C.

, Oud

J. H.

, & Völkle

M. C.

(2017). Continuous time structural equation modeling with R package ctsem. Journal of Statistical Software, 77, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i05.

20.

Fayn

, Silvia

P. J.

, Dejonckheere

, Verdonck

, & Kuppens

(2019). Confused or curious? Openness/intellect predicts more positive interest–confusion relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000257.

21.

Furnham

, & Marks

(2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the recent literature. Psychology, 4, 717–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49102.

22.

Gosling

S. D.

, Rentfrow

P. J.

, & Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092–6566(03)00046–1.

23.

Gross

J. J.

, Sutton

S. K.

, & Ketelaar

(1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect–level and affective–reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298243005.

24.

Hoekstra

H. A.

, Ormel

, & De Fruyt

(1996). NEO persoonlijkheids vragenlijsten: NEO–PI–R: NEO–FFI. Swets Test Services (STS).

25.

Hofmans

, Kuppens

, & Allik

(2008). Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the ten item personality inventory scales in Dutch language. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 750–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.004.

26.

Hui

C. M.

, Fok

H. K.

, & Bond

M. H.

(2009). Who feels more ambivalence? Linking dialectical thinking to mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.022.

27.

Hunter

P. G.

, Schellenberg

, & Schimmack

(2008). Mixed affective responses to music with conflicting cues. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701438145.

28.

Ingram

R. E.

, & Siegle

G. J.

(2009). Methodological issues in the study of depression. In Gotlib

I. H.

, & Hammen

C. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of depression (pp. 69–92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

29.

Jach

H. K.

, & Smillie

L. D.

(2019). To fear or fly to the unknown: Tolerance for ambiguity and Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.003.

30.

John

O. P.

, Naumann

L. P.

, & Soto

C. J.

(2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

31.

Kööts

, Realo

, & Allik

(2012). Relationship between linguistic antonyms in momentary and retrospective ratings of happiness and sadness. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001/a000061.

32.

Koval

, Pe

M. L.

, Meers

, & Kuppens

(2013). Affect dynamics in relation to depressive symptoms: Variable, unstable or inert? Emotion, 13, 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033579.

33.

Koval

, Sütterlin

, & Kuppens

(2016). Emotional inertia is associated with lower well–being when controlling for differences in emotional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01997.

34.

Kreft

, & de Leeuw

(1998). Introducing statistical methods. Introducing multilevel modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209366

35.

Larsen

J. T.

, Hershfield

H. E.

, Stastny

B. J.

, & Hester

(2017). On the relationship between positive and negative affect: Their correlation and co–occurrence. Emotion, 17, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231.

36.

Larsen

J. T.

, & McGraw

A. P.

(2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal ofpersonality and social psychology, 100, 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846.

37.

Larsen

J. T.

, & McGraw

A. P.

(2014). The case for mixed emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12108.

38.

Larsen

R. J.

, & Ketelaar

(1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.61.1.132.

39.

Loossens

, Mestdagh

, Dejonckheere

, Kuppens

, Tuerlinckx

, & Verdonck

(2019). The affective ising model: A computational account of human affect dynamics. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ky23d

40.

Maas

C. J.

, & Hox

J. J.

(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–2241.1.3.86.

41.

Mehl

M. R.

, & Conner

T. S.

(2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

42.

Miyamoto

, Uchida

, & Ellsworth

P. C.

(2010). Culture and mixed emotions: Co–occurrence of positive and negative emotions in Japan and the United States. Emotion, 10, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018430.

43.

Muris

, Roelofs

, Rassin

, Franken

, & Mayer

(2005). Mediating effects of rumination and worry on the links between neuroticism, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.005.

44.

Muthén

L. K.

, & Muthén

B. O.

1998(2012). Mplus user's guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

45.

Pasyugina

, Koval

, De Leersnyder

, Mesquita

, & Kuppens

(2015). Distinguishing between level and impact of rumination as predictors of depressive symptoms: An experience sampling study. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.932755.

46.

M. L.

, & Kuppens

(2012). The dynamic interplay between emotions in daily life: Augmentation, blunting, and the role of appraisal overlap. Emotion, 12, 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028262.

47.

Rafaeli

, Rogers

G. M.

, & Revelle

(2007). Affective synchrony: Individual differences in mixed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301009.

48.

Rauthmann

J. F.

, Sherman

R. A.

, & Funder

D. C.

(2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.

49.

Riediger

, Schmiedek

, Wagner

G. G.

, & Lindenberger

(2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in prohedonic and contra–hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science, 20, 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02473.x.

50.

Riediger

, Wrzus

, & Wagner

G. G.

(2014). Happiness is pleasant, or is it? Implicit representations of affect valence are associated with contrahedonic motivation and mixed affect in daily life. Emotion, 14, 950–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037711.

51.

Russell

J. A.

(1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.

52.

Russell

J. A.

, & Carroll

J. M.

(1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.125.1.3.

53.

Rusting

C. L.

, & Larsen

R. J.

(1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191–8869(96)00246–2.

54.

Schimmack

(2001). Pleasure, displeasure and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive? Cognition & Emotion, 15, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930126097.

55.

Schneider

, & Stone

A. A.

(2015). Mixed emotions across the adult life span in the United States. Psychology and Aging, 30, 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000018.

56.

Scott

S. B.

, Sliwinski

M. J.

, Mogle

J. A.

, & Almeida

D. M.

(2014). Age, stress, and emotional complexity: Results from two studies of daily experiences. Psychological Aging, 29, 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037282.

57.

Shuman

, Sander

, & Scherer

K. R.

(2013). Levels of valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00261.

58.

Smillie

L. D.

, Cooper

A. K.

, Wilt

, & Revelle

(2012). Do extraverts get more bang for the buck. Refining the affective–reactivity hypothesis of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 306–326. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0028372.

59.

Smillie

L. D.

, DeYoung

C. G.

, & Hall

P. J.

(2015). Clarifying the relation between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 83, 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12138.

60.

Suls

, Green

, & Hillis

(1998). Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298242002.

61.

Trampe

, Quoidbach

, & Taquet

(2015). Emotions in everyday life. PLoS ONE, 10, e0145450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145450.

62.

Verduyn

, & Brans

(2012). The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism and aspects of trait affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 664–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.017.

63.

Watson

, & Clark

L. A.

(1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five–factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.1992.tb00980.x.

64.

Watson

, & Stanton

(2017). Emotion blends and mixed emotions in the hierarchical structure of affect. Emotion Review, 9, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639659.

65.

Watson

, & Tellegen

(1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.98.2.219.

66.

Wilt

, Funkhouser

, & Revelle

(2011). The dynamic relationships of affective synchrony to perceptions of situations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.03.005.

67.

Zelenski

J. M.

, & Larsen

R. J.

(2000). The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2275.

68.

Zevon

M. A.

, & Tellegen

(1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.43.1.111.

69.

Zyphur

M. J.

, & Oswald

F. L.

(2015). Bayesian estimation and inference: A user's guide. Journal of Management, 41, 390–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313501200.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

0.17 MB