The present research investigated in a dual task design the effects of extraversion level and structural task properties on the recall of an incidentally learned text. First, the hypothetical relation between arousal level and attentional selectivity was tested. Second, the relation between structural levels in the text and recall of text elements was studied. It was found that (a) extraverts performed significantly better on incidental recall compared to introverts; (b) the nuclear sentences at the top of the hierarchical structure were the best recalled sentences, independently of arousal level; (c) the effect of differences in arousal on recall was only significant in case of the top sentences. The effect was absent in case of specificúsecondary sentences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BroadbentD. E. (1971). Decision and Stress, Academic Press, London.
2.
DawesR. M. (1964). ‘Cognitive distortion’, Psychological Reports, 14:443–459.
3.
DawesR. M. (1966). ‘Memory and distortion of meaningful written material’, British Journal of Psychology, 57:77–86.
4.
van DijkT. A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York.
5.
EasterbrookJ. A. (1959). ‘The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior’, Psychological Review, 66:183–201.
6.
EysenckH. J. (1967). The Biological Basis of Personality, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield.
7.
EysenckH. J. (1973). ‘Personality, learning and anxiety’. In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, pp.390–419, Pittman, London.
8.
Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.) (1981). A Model for Personality, Springer, London.
9.
EysenckH. J.EysenckM. W. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences, Plenum Press, New York.
10.
EysenckM. W. (1977). Human Memory: Theory, Research and Individual Differences, Pergamon Press, New York.
11.
EysenckM. W. (1982). Attention and Arousal, Cognition and Performance, Springer, London.
12.
EysenckM. W. (1984). A Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13.
EysenckM. W.EysenckM. C. (1979). ‘Memory scanning, introversion‐extraversion, and levels of processing’, Journal of Research in Personality, 13:305–315.
14.
FrederiksenC. H. (1975a). ‘Acquisition of semantic information from discourse: Effects of repeated exposures’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14:158–169.
15.
FrederiksenC. H. (1975b). ‘Effect of context‐induced processing operations of semantic information acquired from discourse’, Cognitive Psychology, 7:139–166.
16.
GaleA. (1981). ‘EEG studies of extraversion‐introversion’. In: Lynn, R. (Ed.), Dimensions of Personality, pp.181–207, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
17.
GarcíaMadruga J. A.Martin CorderoJ. I. (1985). Aprendizaje, comprensión y retención de textos escritos[Learning, comprehension, and retention of written texts], CIDE, Madrid.
18.
GeenR. G. (1980). ‘Test anxiety and cue utilization’. In: Sarason, I. G. (Ed.), Text Anxiety: Theory, Research and Applications, pp.43–62, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
19.
HamiltonV. (1975). ‘Socialization anxiety and information processing: A capacity model of anxiety‐induced performance deficits’. In: Sarason I. G. and Spielberger, C. D. (Eds), Stress and Anxiety, Vol. 2, pp.45–68, Academic Press, London.
20.
ImanA. (1974). ‘Extraversion and incidental learning’, Pakistani Journal of Psychology, 7:41–54.
21.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and Effort, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
22.
KintschW. (1974). The Representation of Meaning in Memory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
23.
KintschW. (1975). ‘Memory representations of text’. In: Solso, R. L. (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition, pp.269–294, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
24.
KintschW. (1982). ‘Memory for text’. In: Flamer, A. and Kintsch, W. (Eds), Discourse Processing, pp.186–204, North‐Holland, Amsterdam.
25.
KintschW.van DijkT. A. (1978). ‘Toward a model of text comprehension and production’, Psychological Review, 85:363–394.
26.
MandlerJ. M. (1982). ‘Recent research on story grammars’. In: LeNy J. F. and Kintsch, W. (Eds), Language and Comprehension, pp.207–219, North‐Holland, Amsterdam.
27.
MeyerB. J. F. (1984). ‘Text dimensions and cognitive processing’. In: Mandl, H. , Stein N. L. and Trabasso, T. (Eds), Learning and Comprehension of Text, pp.3–47, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
28.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and Assessment, Wiley, New York.
29.
MuellerJ. H. (1976). ‘Anxiety and cue utilization in human learning and memory’. In: Zuckerman, M. and Spielberger, C. D. (Eds), Emotions and Anxiety, pp.197–229, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
30.
MuellerJ. H. (1979). ‘Anxiety and encoding processes in memory’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5:288–294.
31.
MuellerJ. H. (1980). ‘Text anxiety and the encoding and retrieval of information’. In: Sarason, I. G. (Ed.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Research and Applications, pp.63–86, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
32.
NidefferR. M. (1976). ‘Test of attentional and interpersonal style’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34:394–404.
33.
RumelhartD. E. (1975). ‘Notes on a schema for stories’. In: Bobrow D. G. and Collins, A. (Eds), Representing and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, pp.211–236, Academic Press, New York.
34.
SchwartzS. (1975). ‘Individual differences in cognition: Some relationships between personality and memory’, Journal of Research in Personality, 9:217–225.
35.
SteinN. L.GlennC. G. (1979). ‘An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children’. In: Freedle, R. O. (Ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processing, Vol. 2, pp.53–120, Ablex, Norwood.
36.
ThorndykeP. W. (1977). ‘Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse’, Cognitive Psychology, 9:77–110.
37.
YerkesR. M.DodsonJ. D. (1908). ‘The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of babit‐formation’, Journal of Comparative Neurological Psychology, 18:459–482.
