Recent debates on the status of contemporary trait psychology (Pervin, 1994) have revived old questions about the role of traits in the explanation of behavior: are traits mere descriptions of behavior, or do they offer one legitimate and useful form of explanation? We review the logic of trait explanation and present a general model of the person in which personality traits are hypothetical constructs regarded as basic dispositions. In interaction with external influences—notably shared meaning systems—traits contribute causally to the development of habits, attitudes, skills, and other characteristic adaptations. In this model, action and experience can be explained directly or proximally in terms of the interaction of the immediate situation with the individual's characteristic adaptations, and indirectly or distally in terms of underlying personality traits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation, Holt, New York.
2.
AlstonW. P. (1975). ‘Traits, consistency and conceptual alternatives for personality theory’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 5:17–48.
3.
BlockJ. (1995). ‘A contrarian view of the five‐factor approach to personality description’, Psychological Bulletin, 117:187–215.
4.
BorkenauP. (1992). ‘Implicit personality theory and the five‐factor model’, Journal of Personality, 60:295–327.
5.
BradleyF. H. (1966). Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay,2nd edn, Oxford University Press, London. (Original work published 1897.)
6.
BrodyN. (1994). ‘ Traits’. In: Ramachandran, V. S. (Ed), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Vol. 4, pp.419–425, Academic, San Diego, CA.
7.
BussA. H.PlominR. (1975). A Temperament Theory of Personality Development, Wiley, New York.
8.
BussA. R. (1978). ‘Causes and reasons in attribution theory: a conceptual critique’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36:1311–1321.
9.
BussD. M. (1987). ‘Selection, evocation, and manipulation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53:1214–1221.
10.
BussD. M.CraikK. H. (1983).The act frequency approach to personality', Psychological Review, 90:105–126.
11.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait‐multimethod matrix’, Psychological Bulletin, 56:81–105.
12.
CaspiA.ElderG. H.BemD. J. (1987). ‘Moving against the world: life‐course patterns of explosive children’, Developmental Psychology, 23:308–313.
13.
CattellR. B. (1950). Personality: a Systematic Theoretical and Factual Study, McGraw‐Hill, New York.
14.
CervoneD. (1991). ‘The two disciplines of personality psychology’, Psychological Science, 2:371–377.
15.
CloningerC. R.SvrakicD. M.PrzybeckT. R. (1993). ‘A psychobiological model of temperament and character’, Archives of General Psychiatry, 50:975–990.
16.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1980). ‘Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well‐being: happy and unhappy people’, Journal of Peresonality and Social Psychology, 38:668–678.
17.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). ‘Four ways five factors are basic’, Personality and Individual Differences, 13:653–665.
18.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.ZondermanA. B. (1987). ‘Environmental and dispositional influences on well‐being: longitudinal follow‐up of an American sample’, British Journal of Psychology, 78:299–306.
19.
DearyI. J.MatthewsG. (1993). ‘Personality traits are alive and well’, The Psychologist, July:299–311.
20.
EberlyR. E.HarknessA. R.EngdahlB. E. (1991). ‘An adaptational view of trauma response as illustrated by the prisoner of war experience’, Journal of Traumatic Stress, 4:363–380.
21.
EpsteinS. (1979).The stability of behavior. I. On predicting most of the people much of the time', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37:1097–1126.
22.
EysenckH. J. (1967). The Biological Basis of Personality, Thomas, Springfield, IL.
23.
FunderD. C. (1991). ‘Global traits: a neo‐Allportian approach to personality’, Psychological Science, 2:31–39.
24.
FunderD. C. (1994). ‘Explaining traits’, Psychological Inquiry, 5:125–127.
25.
FunderD. C.SneedC. D. (1993). ‘Behavioral manifestations of personality: an ecological approach to judgmental accuracy’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64:479–490.
26.
GoldmanA. I. (1970). A Theory of Human Action, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
27.
GoughH. G. (1965). ‘Conceptual analysis of psychological test scores and other diagnostic variables’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70:294–302.
HampsonS. E. (1988). The Construction of Personality: An Introduction,2nd edn, Routledge, London.
30.
HampsonS. E. (1992). ‘ The emergence of personality: a broader context for biological perspectives’. In: Gale, A. and Eysenck, M. W. (Eds), Handbook of Individual Differences: Biological Perspectives, pp.115–139, Wiley, New York.
31.
HarknessA. R.HoganR. (in press). ‘ Theory and measurement of traits: two views’. In: Butcher, J. N. (Ed), Practical Considerations in Clinical Personality Assessment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32.
HarréR.MaddenE. H. (1975). Causal Powers, Littlefield Adams, Totowa, NJ.
33.
HartmannE. (1991). Boundaries in the Mind: a New Psychology of Personality Differences, Basic, New York.
34.
HartshornH.MayM. A. (1928). Studies in Deceit, MacMillan, New York.
35.
IshamC. (1989). ‘ Quantum gravity’. In: Davies, P. (Ed), The New Physics, pp.70–93, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36.
JohnsonJ. A. (in press). ‘ Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality’. In: Hogan, R. , Johnson, J. A. and Briggs, S. R. (Eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology, Academic, New York.
37.
LearyD. E. (1984). ‘Philosophy, psychology, and reality’, American Psychologist, 39:917–919.
38.
LittleB. R. (1987). ‘ Personality and the environment’. In: Stokols, D. and Altman, I. (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp.205–244, Wiley, New York.
39.
LoehlinJ. C. , (1992). Genes and Environment in Personality Development, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
40.
LoevingerJ. (1957). ‘Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory’, Psychological Reports, 3: (Monograph Suppl. 9): 635–694.
41.
ManicasP. T.SecordP. F. (1983). ‘Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science’, American Psychologist, 38:399–413.
42.
ManicasP. T.SecordP. F. (1984). ‘Implications for psychology: reply to comments’, American Psychologist, 39:922–926.
43.
MarcusG. E.SullivanJ. L.Theiss‐MorseE.WoodS. L. (in press). Experimenting with Tolerance: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments, Cambridge University Press, New York.
44.
McAdamsD. P. (1994). ‘ Can personality change? Levels of stability and growth in personality across the life span’. In: Heatherton, T. F. and Weinberger, J. L. (Eds), Can Personality Change?, pp.299–313, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
45.
McCraeR. R. (1993‐1994). ‘Openness to Experience as a basic dimension of personality’, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13:39–55.
46.
McCraeR. R. (1994a). ‘Openness to Experience: expanding the boundaries of Factor V,’ European Journal of Personality, 8:251–272.
47.
McCraeR. R. (1994b). ‘ Psychopathology from the perspective of the five‐factor model’. In: Strack, S. and Lorr, M. (Eds), Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality, pp.26–39, Springer, New York.
48.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. , (1983). ‘Social desirability scales: more substance than style’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51:882–888.
49.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. , (1990). Personality in Adulthood, Guilford, New York.
50.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. , (in press). ‘ Toward a new generation of personality theories: theoretical contexts for the five‐factor model’. In: Wiggins, J. S. (Ed), The Five‐Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, Guilford, New York.
51.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.YikM. S. M. (1995). ‘ Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure’. In: Bond, M. H. (Ed), The Handbook of Chinese Psychology, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong, in press.
52.
McCraeR. R.JohnO. P. (1992). ‘An introduction to the five‐factor model and its assessment’, Journal of Personality, 60:175–215.
53.
McDonoughR. (1991). ‘ A culturalist account of folk psychology’. In: Greenwood, J. D. (Ed), The Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionality and Cognitive Science, pp.263–288, Cambridge University Press, New York.
54.
MeehlP. E. (1986). ‘ Trait language and behaviorese’. In: Thompson, T. and Zeiler, M. D. (Eds), Analysis and Integration of Behavioral Units, pp.315–334, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
55.
MeehlP. E. (1993). ‘Four queries about factor reality’, History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 5:4–5.
56.
MeehlP. E.LykkenD. T.SchofieldW.TellegenA. (1971). ‘Recaptured‐Item Technique (RIT): a method for reducing somewhat the subjective element in factor naming’, Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5:171–190.
57.
MessickS. (1981). ‘Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement’, Psychological Bulletin, 89:575–588.
58.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and Assessment, Wiley, New York.
59.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1994). ‘Personality psychology has two goals: must it be two fields?’, Psychological Inquiry, 5:156–158.
60.
MontagI.LevinJ. (1994). ‘The five‐factor personality model in applied settings’, European Journal of Personality, 8:1–11.
61.
MulaikS. A. (1987). ‘Toward a conception of causality applicable to experimentation and causal modeling’, Child Development, 58:18–32.
62.
NormanW. T. (1963).Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings', Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66:574–583.
63.
OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (1993). ‘Attitudes and attitude change’, Annual Review of Psychology, 44:117–154.
64.
OstendorfF. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf‐Faktoren‐Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and Personality Structure: Toward the Validation of the Five‐Factor Model of Personality], Roderer, Regensburg.
65.
OzerD. J. (1989). ‘ Construct validity in personality assessment’. In: Buss, D. M. and Cantor, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp.224–234, Springer, New York.
66.
PervinL. A. (1989). Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
67.
PervinL. A. (1994). ‘A critical analysis of current trait theory’, Psychological Inquiry, 5:103–113.
68.
RobinsonD. N. (1984).The new philosophy of science: a reply to Manicas and Secord', American Psychologist, 39:920–921.
69.
RozeboomW. W. (1973). ‘Dispositions revisited’, Philosophy of Science, 40:59–74.
70.
RozeboomW. W. (1984). ‘Dispositions do explain: picking up the pieces after Hurricane Walter’, Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 1:205–223.
71.
RushtonJ. P.FulkerD. W.NealeM. C.NiasD. K. B.EysenckH. J. (1986). ‘Altruism and aggression: the heritability of individual differences’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50:1192–1198.
72.
RyleG. (1949). The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.
73.
ShwederR. A.SullivanM. A. (1990). ‘ The semiotic subject of cultural psychology’. In: Pervin, L. A. (Ed), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, pp.399–416, Guilford, New York.
74.
ShwederR. A.SullivanM. A. (1993). ‘Cultural psychology: who needs it?’, Annual Review of Psychology, 44:497–523.
75.
StagnerR. (1994). ‘Traits and theoreticians’, Psychological Inquiry, 5:166–168.
76.
TellegenA. (1988). ‘The analysis of consistency in personality assessment’, Journal of Personality, 56:621–663.
77.
TellegenA. (1991). ‘ Personality traits: issues of definition, evidence, and assessment’. In: Cicchetti, D. and Grove, W. (Eds), Thinking Clearly about Psychology: Essays in Honor of Paul Everett Meehl, Vol. 2, pp.10–35, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
78.
TellegenA.LykkenD. T.BouchardT. J.WilcoxK. J.SegalN. L.RichS. , (1988). ‘Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54:1031–1039.
79.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1990). ‘On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation’, Journal of Personality, 58:17–68.
80.
Trope, Y. and Higgins, E. T. (Eds) (1993). ‘On inferring personal dispositions from behavior’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19. (Special Issue).
81.
WakefieldJ. C. (1989). ‘ Levels of explanation in personality theory’. In: Buss, D. M. and Cantor, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp.333–346, Springer, New York.
82.
WigginsJ. S. (1984). ‘Cattell's system from the perspective of mainstream personality theory’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19:176–190.
83.
WigginsJ. S. (1992). ‘Have model, will travel’, Journal of Personality, 60:527–532.
84.
WigginsJ. S. (in press). ‘ In defense of traits’. In Hogan, R. , Johnson, J. A. and Briggs, S. (Eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology, Academic, San Diego, CA(Original work presented 1973).
85.
WrightJ. C.MischelW. (1987). ‘A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53:1159–1177.
