The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach

Abstract

The relationship between Big Five personality (measured by the NEO‐PI) and prejudice was examined using a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach. Big Five scores were related to a generalized prejudice factor based on seven different prejudice scales (racial prejudice, sexism, etc). A correlation analysis disclosed that Openness to Experience and Agreeableness were significantly related to prejudice, and a multiple regression analysis showed that a variable‐centred approach displayed a substantial cross‐validated relationship between the five personality factors and prejudice. A cluster analysis of the Big Five profiles yielded, in line with previous research, three personality types, but this person‐centred approach showed a low cross‐validated relationship between personality and prejudice, where the overcontrolled type showed the highest prejudice and the undercontrolled the lowest, with the resilient falling in between. A head‐to‐head comparison sustained the conclusion that, based on people's Big Five personalities, their generalized prejudice could be predicted more accurately by the variable‐ than the person‐centred approach. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel‐Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Sanford

R. N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Norton.

Akrami

Ekehammar

Araya

(2000).Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30,521–532.

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.

Allport

G. W.

(1979). The nature of prejudice(25th anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus. (Original work published1954).

Altemeyer

(1981). Right‐wing authoritarianism. Manitoba: University Press.

Altemeyer

(1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right‐wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.

Altemeyer

(1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality.’In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 30, pp.47–92. Orlando, FL: Academic.

Asendorpf

J. B.

(2003).Head‐to‐head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and personality dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 17, in press.

Asendorpf

J. B.

Borkenau

Ostendorf

van Aken

M. A. G.

(2001).Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15,169–198.

10.

Asendorpf

J. B.

van Aken

M. A. G.

(1999).Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: Replicability, predictive power, and the trait‐type issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,815–832.

11.

Barbaranelli

(2002).Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application of the Italian NEO Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16,S43–S56.

12.

Block

J. H.

Block

(1980). The role of ego‐control and ego‐resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology(Vol. 13, pp.39–101. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

13.

Boehm

Asendorpf

J. B.

Avia

M. D.

(2002).Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO‐PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16,S25–S42.

14.

Caspi

(1998). Personality development across the life course. In W. Damon (Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development(5th ed., Vol. 3, pp.311–388. New York: Wiley.

15.

Costa

P. T.

Herbst

J. H.

McCrae

R. R.

Samuels

Ozer

D. J.

(2002).The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16,S73–S88.

16.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

17.

De Fruyt

Mervielde

Van Leeuwen

(2002).The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five‐factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16,S57–S72.

18.

De Raad

Perugini

Hrebickova

Szarota

(1998).Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 29,212–232.

19.

Doty

R. G.

Winter

D. G.

Peterson

B. E.

Kemmelmeier

(1997).Authoritarianism and American students' attitudes about the Gulf War, 1990–1996. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,1133–1143.

20.

Duckitt

(1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.

21.

Duriez

Van Hiel

(2002).The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32,1199–1213.

22.

Ekehammar

Akrami

Araya

(2000).Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41,307–314.

23.

Fiske

S. T.

(1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology(4th ed., pp.357–411. New York: McGraw‐Hill.

24.

Graziano

W. G.

Eisenberg

N. H.

(1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan , J. A. Johnson , & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology(pp.795–824. San Diego, CA: Academic.

25.

Hair

J. F.

Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

Black

W. C.

(1998). Multivariate data analysis(5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.

26.

Hartley

E. L.

(1946). Problems in prejudice. New York: Kings Crown.

27.

Heaven

P. C. L.

Bucci

(2001).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15,49–56.

28.

Hillin

S. J.

McFarland

S. G.

(2002, January).Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, empathy and ingroup favoritism in minimal groups. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA.

29.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin , & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed., pp.102–138. New York: Guilford.

30.

Lippa

Arad

(1999).Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33,463–493.

31.

McConahay

J. B.

(1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio , & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism(pp.91–126. New York: Academic.

32.

McCrae

R. R.

(1996).Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120,323–337.

33.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan , J. A. Johnson , & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology(pp.825–847. San Diego, CA: Academic.

34.

McFarland

S. G.

Mattern

(2002, January).Generalized explicit and implicit prejudice. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA.

35.

Mervielde

Asendorpf

J. B.

(2000). Variable‐centred and person‐centred approaches to childhood personality. In S. E. Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology(Vol. 1, pp.37–76. Hove: Psychology.

36.

Ozer

D. J.

Howell

, S&(2002, July).Evaluating personality types. Paper presented at the biannual European Conference on Personality, Jena.

37.

Peterson

B. E.

Smirles

K. A.

Wentworth

P. A.

(1997).Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,1202–1216.

38.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994).Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,741–763.

39.

Pulkkinen

(1996).Female and male personality styles: A typological and developmental analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,1288–1306.

40.

Rammstedt

Riemann

Angleitner

Borkenau

Resilient, overcontrollers, and undercontrollers: Replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. European Journal of Personality, in press.

41.

Reynolds

K. J.

Turner

J. C.

Haslam

S. A.

Ryan

M. K.

(2001).The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37,427–434.

42.

Saucier

Goldberg

L. R.

(1998).What is beyond the Big Five. Journal of Personality, 66,495–524.

43.

Schnabel

Asendorpf

A. J.

Ostendorf

(2002).Replicable types and subtypes of personality: German NEO‐PI‐R versus NEO‐FFI. European Journal of Personality, 16,S7–S24.

44.

Sears

D. O.

(1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz , & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy(pp.53–84. New York: Plenum.

45.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Stöber

(2001).The Social Desirability Scale‐17 (SDS‐17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17,222–232.

47.

Swim

J. K.

Aikin

K. J.

Hall

W. S.

Hunter

B. A.

(1995).Sexism and racism: Old‐fashioned and modern prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,199–214.

48.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin , & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations(pp.33–47. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks–Cole.

49.

Trapnell

P. D.

(1994).Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8,273–290.

50.

Turner

J. C.

Onorato

R. S.

(1999). Social identity, personality, and the self‐concept: A self‐categorization perspective. In T. R. Tyler , R. Kramer , & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self(pp.11–46. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

51.

Turner

J. C.

Reynolds

K. J.

(2001). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In R. Brown , & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes(Vol. 4, pp.133–152. Oxford: Blackwell.

52.

Van Hiel

Kossowska

Mervielde

(2000).The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28,741–751.

53.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(2002).Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32,965–976.

54.

Verkuyten

Hagendoorn

(1998).Prejudice and self‐categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and in‐group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,99–110.

55.

Whitley

B. E.

(1999).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,126–134.

56.

Whitley

B. E.

Ægisdottir

(2000).The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42,947–967.

57.

Whitley

B. E.

Lee

S. E.

(2000).The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,144–170.