Personality,expectations,and response strategies in multiple‐choice question examinations in university students: a test of Gray's hypotheses

Abstract

The relation between personality and type of error made in multiple‐choice examinations when correction for guessing is applied was investigated across two studies. Our general hypothesis was that disinhibited subjects (those scoring high on the Sensitivity to Reward (SR) scale and/or low on the Sensitivity to Punishment (SP) scale) would make more incorrect responses and fewer omission errors (blanks) than inhibited subjects (those with high SP and/or low SR scores). The meta‐analyses of 19 examinations in study 1 confirmed our hypotheses for SP, SR, and extraversion. Regression analyses on effect sizes revealed that SP differences were obtained in examinations with low marks, whereas SR differences were obtained in examinations with more responses and fewer questions. Study 2 showed that a low‐mark expectation increased omissions in high‐SP subjects, whereas a high‐mark expectation increased incorrect responses in high‐SR subjects. These results suggest two different mechanisms mediating inhibition/disinhibition: one associated with aversive motivation, and the other with appetitive motivation. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ávila

(2001).Distinguishing BIS‐mediated and BAS‐mediated disinhibition mechanisms: A comparison of disinhibition models of Gray and Patterson and Newman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80,311–324.

Ávila

Moltó

Segarra

Torrubia

(1995).Sensitivity to primary or secondary reinforcers, what is the mechanism underlying passive avoidance deficits in extraverts? Journal of Research in Personality, 29,373–394.

Caseras

Ávila

Torrubia

(2003).The measurement of individual differences in Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems: A comparison of personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 34,99–1013.

Corr

P. J.

(2001).Testing problems in J. A. Gray personality theory: Commentary on Matthews and Gilliland(1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30,333–352.

Corr

P. J.

(2002). J. A.Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33,511–532.

Eysenck

M. W.

Derakshan

(1997).Cognitive biases for future negative events as a function of trait anxiety and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 22,597–606.

Eysenck

S. B. G.

Garcia Sevilla

Torrubia

Ávila

Ortet

(1992).Versió catalana de l'Eysenck Personality Questionnaire per a la mesura de la personalitat [Catalan version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire]. Annals de Medicina, 9,223–230.

Fowles

D. C.

(1987).Application of a behavioral theory of motivation to the concepts of anxiety and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 21,417–435.

Gray

J. A.

(1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Gray

J. A.

Smith

P. T.

(1969). An arousal decision model for partial reinforcement and discrimination learning. In R. M. Gilbert , & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning(pp.243–272). London: Academic.

11.

Hedges

L. V.

(1994). Fixed effects models. In H. Cooper , & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis(pp.285–300). New York: Sage.

12.

Miller

(1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In J. M. V. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavioral disorders(pp.431–465). New York: Ronald.

13.

Newman

J. P.

(1987).Reaction to punishment in Extraverts and Psychopaths: Implications for the impulsive behavior of disinhibited individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 21,464–480.

14.

Newman

J. P.

Widom

C. S.

Nathan

(1985).Passive avoidance in syndromes of disinhibition: Psychopathy and extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48,1316–1327.

15.

Nigg

J. T.

Hinshaw

S. P.

Halperin

J. M.

(1996).Continuous performance test in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Metilphenydate dose response and relations with observed behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25,330–340.

16.

Patterson

C. M.

Newman

J. P.

(1993).Reflectivity and learning from aversive events: Toward a psychological mechanism for Syndromes of Disinhibition. Psychological Review, 100,716–736.

17.

Pickering

A. D.

Corr

P. J.

Powell

J. H.

Kumari

Thornton

J. C.

Gray

J. A.

(1997). Individual differences in reactions to reinforcing stimuli are neither black nor white: To what extent are they Gray?In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of personality: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty(pp.36–67). London: Elsevier.

18.

Spielberger

C. D.

Gorusch

R. L.

Lushene

(1970). STAI. Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado–Rasgo[Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory]. Madrid: TEA.

19.

Torrubia

Ávila

Moltó

Caseras

(2001).The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's Anxiety and Impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 29,837–862.

20.

Torrubia

Ávila

Moltó

Grande

(1995). Testing for stress and happiness: The rôle of the behavioral inhibition system. In C. D. Spielberger , I. G. Sarason , J. Brebner , E. Greenglass , P. Langani , & A. M. O'Roark (Eds.), Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger, and curiosity(Vol. 15, pp.189–211). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

21.

Zinbarg

R. E.

Mohlman

(1998).Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively valenced associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,1024–1040.