Are cognitive differences between immigrant and majority groups diminishing?

Abstract

A review is given of scores on various cognitive measures, comparing groups of ethnic Dutch and non‐Western immigrants using a large number of datasets.

The research shows that there are large group differences in school results, work proficiency, and g for Turks, Moroccans, Surinamese, Netherlands Antilleans, and Indonesians from the Moluccans compared with ethnic Dutch. However, South‐East Asians score higher, and persons with one immigrant and one ethnic Dutch parent score only slightly below the mean of the Dutch. When comparing first‐generation disadvantaged immigrant groups with later generations the data show substantial improvements for g, a remarkable stability of educational differences for younger children, and a clear improvement in educational achievement at the end of primary school. Indirect data on intergenerational improvements in work proficiency appear suggestive of a trend of closing gaps.

Some of the data reflect higher cognitive capacities over time, and this enhances integration of immigrants into Dutch society. Causes of group differences and improvements in mean level of g are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bashi

(1977).Effects of inbreeding on cognitive performance of Israeli Arab children. Nature, 266,440–442.

Benton

Roberts

(1988).Effect of vitamin and mineral supplementation on intelligence of a sample of schoolchildren. Lancet, 333,140–144.

Bleichrodt

Born

M. Ph.

(1994). A meta‐analysis of research on iodine and its relationship to cognitive development. In J. B. Stanbury , (Ed.), The damaged brain and iodine deficiency(pp.195–200). New York: Cogizant Communication.

Carroll

J. B.

(1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor‐analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ceci

S. J.

(1991).How much does schooling influence intellectual development and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27,703–722.

Ceci

S. J.

Rosenblum

T. B.

Kumpf

(1998). The shrinking gap between high‐ and low‐scoring groups: Current trends and possible causes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long‐term gains in IQ and related measures(pp.287–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek [Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics](2000). Allochtonen in Nederland 1999[Minorities in The Netherlands 2000]. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(1979). Quasi‐experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton.

Dagevos

J. M.

(1996).Allochtonen in de functiestructuur. Individuele kenmerken, groepsgebonden oriëntaties, etnische functies en ongelijke kansen [Immigrants in the job hierachy. Individual characteristics, group directed orientations, ethnic jobs and unequal opportunities]. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 12,4–17.

10.

Dagevos

J. M.

(2001a).Interne promotiemogelijkheden van etnische minderheden. De betekenis van menselijk kapitaal, baankenmerken en ongelijke behandeling [Internal promotion possibilities of immigrants. The role of human capital, job characteristics and unequal treatment]. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 17,380–389.

11.

Dagevos

J. M.

(2001b). Rapportage minderheden 2001. Deel II Meer werk[Report on minorities 2001. Part II More work]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

12.

Dagevos

J. M.

Veenman

(1996). Werkloosheid en het voortduren van achterstand [Unemployment and continuation of disadvantage]. In J. Veenman (Ed.), Keren de kansen? De tweede‐generatie allochtonen in Nederland[Do their chances improve? The second generation immigrants in the Netherlands] (pp.39–62). Assen, the Netherlands: van Gorcum.

13.

de Jong

M. J.

(1987). Herkomst, kennis en kansen: Allochtone en autochtone leerlingen tijdens de overgang van basis‐ naar voortgezet onderwijs[Origin, knowledge, and opportunities: Immigrant and majority group pupils during the transition from primary to secondary education]. Lisse: Swets.

14.

de Jong

M. J.

(1989).Toenemende apartheid in het Nederlandse onderwijs: Oorzaken, gevolgen en een mogelijke remedie [Increasing separation in Dutch education: Causes, consequences, and a possible remedy]. Pedagogische Studiën, 88(2),61–73.

15.

de Jong

M. J.

van Batenburg

Th. A.

(1984).Etnische herkomst, intelligentie en schoolkeuzeadvies [Ethnic origin, intelligence, and school choice advice]. Pedagogische Studiën, 61,362–371.

16.

de Vries

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1998).Effects of ethnic diversity: The position of minority workers in two Dutch organizations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28,1503–1530.

17.

Driessen

(1991).Discrepanties tussen toetsresultaten en doorstroomniveau. Positieve discriminatie bij de overgang basisonderwijs—voortgezet onderwijs?[Discrepancies between test results and transfer level. Positive discrimination during the transition from primary education to secondary education]. Pedagogische Studiën, 68,27–35.

18.

Flynn

J. R.

(1984).The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95,29–51.

19.

Flynn

J. R.

(1987).Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101,171–191.

20.

Frydman

Lynn

(1989).The intelligence of Korean children adopted in Belgium. Personality and Individual Differences, 10,1323–1325.

21.

Grissmer

Flanagan

Williamson

(1998). Why did the Black–White score gap narrow in the 1970s and 1980s?In C. Jencks , & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black–White test score gap(pp.182–226). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

22.

Grissmer

D. W.

Williamson

Kirby

S. N.

Berends

(1998). Exploring the rapid rise in black achievement scores in the United States (1970–1990). In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long‐term gains in IQ and related measures(pp.251–285). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

23.

Harrison

P. L.

Schock

H. H.

(1994). Draw‐a‐Figure Test. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence(pp.361–362). New York: Macmillan.

24.

Hedges

L. V.

Nowell

(1998). Black–White test score convergence since 1965. In C. Jencks , & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black–White test score gap(pp.149–181). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

25.

Helms‐Lorenz

van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Poortinga

Y. H.

(2003).Cross‐cultural differences in cognitive performance and Spearman's hypothesis: g or c? Intelligence, 31,9–29.

26.

Jensen

A. R.

(1980). Bias in mental testing. London: Methuen.

27.

Jensen

A. R.

(1985).The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8,193–219.

28.

Jensen

A. R.

(1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. London: Praeger.

29.

Koeslag

Dronkers

(1994).Overadvisering en de schoolloopbanen van migrantenleerlingen en autochtone leerlingen in het voortgezet onderwijs [Over‐advising and the school careers of immigrants and majority group pupils in secondary education]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 19,240–258.

30.

Lopez

E. C.

(1997). The cognitive assessment of limited English proficient and bilingual children. In D. P. Flanagan , J. L. Genshaft , & P. L. Harrison , (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues(pp.503–516). New York: Guilford.

31.

Lubinski

Dawis

R. V.

(1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. D. Dunnette , & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology(2nd ed., Vol. 3). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

32.

Lynn

(1983).IQ in Japan and the United States. Nature, 306,291–292.

33.

Lynn

(1998).Has the black–white intelligence difference in the United States been narrowing over time? Personality and Individual Differences, 25,999–1002.

34.

Lynn

Vanhanen

(2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.

35.

Martens

E. P.

Verweij

A. O.

(1997). Antillianen en Arubanen in Nederland: Kerncijfers 1996[Netherlands Antilleans and Arubans in the Netherlands: Essential figures 1996]. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Instituut voor Sociologisch‐Economisch Onderzoek.

36.

Neisser

Boodoo

Bouchard

T. J. J.

Boykin

A. W.

Brody

Ceci, S. J.

et al.

(1996).Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51,277–101.

37.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw‐Hill.

38.

Ogbu

J. U.

(1994). Culture and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Ecyclopedia of human intelligence(pp.328–338). New York: Macmillan.

39.

Pennock‐Román

(1992). Interpreting test performance in selective admissions for Hispanic students. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), Psychological testing of Hispanics(pp.99–135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

40.

Resing

W. C. M.

Bleichrodt

Drenth

P. J. D.

(1986).Het gebruik van de RAKIT bij allochtoon etnische groepen [Use of the RAKIT for assessment of immigrants]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 41,179–188.

41.

Sahin

Duzen

(1994).Turkish standardisation of Raven's SPM. InProceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid.

42.

Salgado

J. F.

Anderson

Moscoso

Bertua

de Fruyt

(2003).International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities as predictors of work behaviours: A European contribution and comparison with American findings. Personnel Psychology, 56,573–605.

43.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hunter

J. E.

(1998).The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124,262–274.

44.

Snijders

J. Th.

Tellegen

P. J.

Laros

J. A.

(1988). Snijders–Oomen niet‐verbale intelligentietest: S.O.N.‐R 5.5‐17. Verantwoording en handleiding[Snijders–Oomen nonverbal intelligence test S.O.N. 5.5‐17. Justification and manual]. Groningen: Wolters‐Noordhoff.

45.

Spijkerman

R. M. H.

(2000). De positie van allochtonen en autochtonen in het bedrijfsleven en bij een deel van de overheid[The position of immigrants and majority group members in industry and part of the governmental organizations]. Den Haag: Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie.

46.

Stams

G.‐J. J. M.

Juffers

Rispens

Hoksbergen

R. A. C.

(2000).The development and adjustment of 7‐year‐old children adopted in infancy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41,1025–1037.

47.

Teebi

S. T.

Farag

T. I.

(1997). Genetic disorders among Arab populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

48.

Tellegen

P. J.

(2002).De WISC‐III: Een illusie armer [The WISC III: One illusion less]. De Psycholoog, 37,607–610.

49.

Tellegen

P. J.

Winkel

Wijnberg‐Williams

Laros

(1998). Snijders–Oomen niet‐verbale intelligentietest: SON‐R 2.5‐7. Handleiding en verantwoording[Snijders–Oomen nonverbal intelligence test: SON‐R 2.5‐7. Manual and justification]. Lisse: Swets.

50.

te Nijenhuis

(2001).Enige theoretische en empirische problemen bij intelligentiemeting met alternatieve tests: Een reactie op Van den Berg en Bleichrodt (2000) [Some theoretical and empirical problems when testing with alternative intelligence tests: A reaction to van den Berg and Bleichrodt (2000)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 56,10–15.

51.

te Nijenhuis

Evers

Mur

J. P.

(2000).Validity of the Differential Aptitude Test for immigrant children. Educational Psychology, 20,99–115.

52.

te Nijenhuis

Tolboom

E. A. M.

Resing

W. C. M.

Bleichrodt

(in press).Does cultural background influence the intellectual performance of children from immigrant groups?: Validity of the RAKIT intelligence test for immigrant children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

53.

te Nijenhuis

van der Flier

(1997).Comparability of GATB scores for immigrants and majority group members: Some Dutch findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,675–687.

54.

te Nijenhuis

van der Flier

(1999).Bias research in the Netherlands: Review and implications. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15,165–175.

55.

te Nijenhuis

van der Flier

(2000).Differential prediction of immigrant versus majority group training performance using cognitive ability and personality measures? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8,54–60.

56.

te Nijenhuis

van der Flier

(2001).Group differences in mean intelligence for the Dutch and third world immigrants. Journal of Biosocial Science, 33,469–475.

57.

te Nijenhuis

van der Flier

(2003).Immigrant–majority group differences in cognitive performance: Jensen effects, cultural effects, or both? Intelligence, 31,443–459.

58.

Tesser

P. T. M.

Iedema

(2001). Rapportage Minderheden 2001: Vorderingen op school. [Report on ethnic minorities 2001: Achievement in school]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

59.

Tesser

P. T. M.

Merens

J. G. F.

van Praag

(1999). Rapportage minderheden 1999: Positie in het onderwijs en op de arbeidsmarkt[Report on minorities 1999: Position in education and on the labor market]. Rijswijk, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

60.

Thorndike

R. L.

Hagen

E. P.

Sattler

J. M.

(1986). Stanford–Binet intelligence scale: Fourth edition (Technical manual). Chicago, IL: Riverside.

61.

Uiterwijk

(1994). Eindtoets Basisonderwijs. De bruikbaarheid van de Eindtoets Basisonderwijs voor allochtone leerlingen[Suitability of the Primary‐ School Leaving Test for students from non‐Dutch backgrounds]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: CITO.

62.

van den Berg

R. H.

(2001). Psychologisch onderzoek in een multiculturele samenleving: Psychologische tests, interview‐ en functioneringsbeoordelingen[Psychological research in a multicultural society: Psychological tests, interview, and job proficiency assesment]. Amsterdam: Stichting NOA.

63.

van den Berg

R. H.

Bleichrodt

(2000).Intelligentiemeting bij kandidaten met verschillende culturele achtergronden: de Multiculturele Capaciteiten Test (MCT‐M) [Intelligence measurement of candidates with varying cultural backgrounds: the Multicultural Capacities Test (MCT‐M). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 55,134–147.

64.

van de Vijfeijken

Vedder

(2000).De cultuurgevoeligheid van de mens‐teken‐test [The sensitivity to culture of the Draw‐a‐Man test]. Pedagogische Studiën, 77,166–172.

65.

van de Vijfeijken

Vedder

Kook

(1997).Menstekening en cognitieve ontwikkeling op Curaçao [Draw‐a‐Man and cognitive development on Curaçao]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Opvoeding, Vorming en Onderwijs, 13,262–274.

66.

van de Vijver

Willemse

van de Rijt

(1993).Het testen van cognitieve vaardigheden van allochtone leerlingen [Testing of cognitive skills of immigrant pupils]. De Psycholoog, 48,152–159.

67.

van Gastel

J. H. M.

Bleichrodt

van Heelsum

A. J.

(1994). Het gelijk van de praktijk: Loopbaanontwikkeling en werkbeleving van allochtonen en autochtonen[ Practice in the right: Career development and work satisfaction of immigrants and majority group members]. In N. Bleichrodt (Ed.), Gelijke Kansen op Werk: Evenredige vertegenwoordiging van allochtonen en autochtonen in 2000[Equal opportunities for work: Equal proportions of immigrants and majority group members in 2000] (pp.53–109). Amsterdam: Stichting PION.

68.

van Leest

P. F.

(1997). Persoonlijkheidsmeting bij allochtonen: De gebruikswaarde van persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten bij selectie van allochtonen[Assessment of personality for ethnic minorities: The usefulness of personality questionnaires for the selection of immigrants]. Lisse: Swets.

69.

van Leest

P. F.

Dutman

(1995).Psychologische selectie voor de Turken‐en Marokkanenpool: Onderzoek naar de voorspellende waarde [Psychological selection for the Turks and Moroccans pool: A study into predictive validity]. Het Tijdschrift voor de Politie, 57(4),14–17.

70.

van Rooijen

(1992).Het gebruik van psychologische tests bij allochtonen in het kader van selektie[The use of psychological tests for assessment of immigrants for selection]. Paper presented at WAOP conference, University of Groningen.

71.

Veen

Robijns

(1994).Schoolloopbanen van Molukse leerlingen in het voortgezet onderwijs [School careers of Moluccan pupils in secondary education]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 19,143–159.

72.

Verhaeghe

Schittekatte

Vermeir

Bosmans

(2002).Dé nieuwe Nederlandstalige intelligentietest: De WISC‐III[The new Dutch‐language intelligence test: The WISC‐III]. Press release, University of Ghent.

73.

Verouden

Ross

Stet

Scheele

(1987). Psychologische selektie van etnische minderheden: Verslag van een onderzoek naar voor allochtonen bruikbare testmethoden ten behoeve van de gemeente Amsterdam[Psychological selection of ethnic minorities: Report of a study into testing methods that can be used for immigrants for the municipality of Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: Gemeentelijke Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst.

74.

Vincent

K. R.

(1991).Black/White IQ differences: Does age make the difference? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47,266–270.

75.

Wachs

T. D.

McCabe

Mousa

Yunis

Kirksey

Galal

Harrison

Jerome

(1996).Cognitive performance of Egyptian adults as a function of nutritional intake and sociodemographic factors. Intelligence, 22,129–154.

76.

Watkins

W. E.

Pollitt

(1997).‘Stupidity or worms’. Do intestinal worms impair mental performance? Psychological Bulletin, 121,171–191.