Situational and dispositional coping: an examination of their relation to personality,cognitive appraisals,and psychological distress

Abstract

Reliable data on the relationships between situational and dispositional coping strategies are sparse. In order to address this gap in the literature, this study examined the determinants and adaptational outcomes of both types of coping. Two hundred and thirty‐three students completed, along with measures of situational and dispositional coping, measures of personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress, the latter variable being evaluated concurrently and prospectively (10 weeks). Results showed that personality shared as much variance with situational as with dispositional coping, but the patterns of relationships were rather different. In addition, cognitive appraisals were found to add significant incremental validity in predicting situational coping beyond trait coping, but primary appraisals were redundant with personality traits, in particular neuroticism. Finally, in spite of the significant amount of variance shared between the two types of coping, they both accounted for individual differences in concomitant and prospective psychological distress, and the relation between dispositional coping and distress was partially mediated by situational coping. The implications of these findings for understanding the relationships between the two types of coping strategy are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayers

T. S.

Sandler

I. N.

West

S. G.

Roosa

M. W.

(1996).A dispositional and situational assessment of children's coping: Testing alternative models of coping. Journal of Personality, 64,923–958.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986).The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,1173–1182.

Bolger

Zuckerman

(1995).A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,890–902.

Bouchard

(2003).Cognitive appraisals, neuroticism, and openness as correlates of coping strategies: An integrative model of adaptation to marital difficulties. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 35,1–12.

Bouchard

Sabourin

Lussier

Wright

Richer

(1997).Testing the theoretical models underlying the Ways of Coping Questionnaire with couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59,409–418.

Brebner

(2001).Personality and stress coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 31,317–327.

Briggs

Cheek

(1986).The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54,106–148.

Brown

S. L.

(1994).Factor structure of a brief version of the Ways of Coping (WOC) Questionnaire: A study with veterinary medicine students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27,308–315.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(1994).Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,184–195.

10.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

Weintraub

J. K.

(1989).Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,267–283.

11.

Chang

E. D.

(1998).Dispositional optimism and primary and secondary appraisal of a stressor: Controlling for confounding influences and relations to coping and psychological and physical adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,1109–1120.

12.

Clark

K. K.

Bormann

C. A.

Cropanzano

R. S.

James

(1995).Validation evidence for three coping measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65,434–455.

13.

Cohen

Lazarus

R. S.

(1973).Active coping processes, coping dispositions, and recovery from surgery. Psychosomatic Medicine, 35,375–389.

14.

Connor‐Smith

J. K.

Compas

B. E.

Wadsworth

M. E.

Thomsen

A. H.

Saltzman

(2000).Responses to stress in adolescence: Measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68,976–992.

15.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

16.

David

J. P.

Suls

(1999).Coping efforts in daily life: Role of big five traits and problem appraisals. Journal of Personality, 67,265–294.

17.

Derogatis

L. R.

Lipman

R. S.

Uhlenhuth

E. H.

(1974).The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self‐report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19,1–5.

18.

Drach‐Zahavy

Erez

(2002).Challenge versus threat effects on the goal–performance relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88,667–682.

19.

Ferguson

(2001).Personality and coping traits: A joint factor analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6,311–325.

20.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1985).If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48,150–170.

21.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1988a).Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,466–475.

22.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1988b).The relationship between coping and emotion: Implications for theory and research. Social Science in Medicine, 26,309–317.

23.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1988c). Ways of Coping Questionnaire: Research edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

24.

Forsythe

C. J.

Compas

B. E.

(1987).Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11,473–485.

25.

Hewitt

P. L.

Flett

G. L.

(1996). Personality traits and the coping process. In M. Zeidner , & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications(pp.410–433). New York: Wiley.

26.

Holden

R. R.

Fekken

G. C.

(1994).The NEO Five‐Factor Inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 17,441–444.

27.

Ilfeld

F. W.

(1976).Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39,1215–1228.

28.

Ilfeld

F. W.

(1978).Psychologic status of community residents along major demographic dimensions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35,716–724.

29.

Judd

C. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Kazdin

A. E.

(1998). Research design in clinical psychology(3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

31.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1993).From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44,1–21.

32.

Major

Richards

Cooper

M. L.

Cozzarelli

Zubek

(1998).Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: An integrative model of adjustment to abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,735–752.

33.

Martin

Sabourin

Gendreau

(1989).Les dimensions de la détresse psychologique: Analyse factorielle confirmatoire de type hiérarchique. International Journal of Psychology, 24,571–584.

34.

McCrae

R. R.

John

O. P.

(1992).An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Special Issue: The five‐factor model: Issues and applications. Journal of Personality, 60,175–215.

35.

O'Brien

T. B.

DeLongis

(1996).The interactional context of problem‐, emotion‐, and relationship‐focused coping: The role of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64,775–813.

36.

Parker

J. D. A.

Endler

N. S.

Bagby

R. M.

(1993).If it changes, it might be unstable: Examining the factor structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 5,361–368.

37.

Parkes

K. R.

(1994).Personality and coping as moderators of work stress processes: Models, methods and measures. Work and Stress, 8,110–129.

38.

Penley

J. A.

Tomaka

(2002).Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32,1215–1228.

39.

Schwartz

J. E.

Neale

Marco

Shiffman

S. S.

Stone

A. A.

(1999).Does trait coping exist? A momentary assessment approach to the evaluation of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,360–369.

40.

Sheskin

D. J.

(1997). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. New York: CRC Press.

41.

Skinner

E. A.

Edge

Altman

Sherwood

(2003).Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129,216–269.

42.

Sorgen

K. E.

Manne

S. L.

(2002).Coping in children with cancer: Examining the goodness‐of‐fit hypothesis. Children's Health Care, 31,191–207.

43.

Suls

David

J. P.

(1996).Coping and personality: Third time's the charm? Journal of Personality, 64,993–1005.

44.

Suls

David

J. P.

Harvey

J. H.

(1996).Personality and coping: Three generations of research. Journal of Personality, 64,711–735.

45.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(1996). Using multivariate statistics(3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

46.

Tennen

Herzberger

(1985). Ways of Coping Scale. In D. J. Keyser , & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Tests critiques(pp.686–697). Kansas City, KS: Test Corporation of America.

47.

Terry

D. J.

(1994).Determinants of coping: The role of stable and situational factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,895–910.

48.

Uehara

Sakado

Sato

Someya

(1999).Relationship between stress coping and personality in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68,26–30.

49.

Vollrath

Torgersen

(2000).Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29,367–378.

50.

Watson

Hubbard

(1996).Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five‐factor model. Journal of Personality, 64,737–774.