What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality,Social Dominance Orientation,or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism?

Abstract

Whereas previous research has studied the relation of either (i) personality with prejudice, (ii) personality with social dominance orientation (SDO) and right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), or (iii) SDO and RWA with prejudice, the present research integrates all approaches within the same model. In our study (N = 183), various causal models of the relationships among the Big Five, SDO, RWA, and Generalized Prejudice are proposed and tested. Generalized Prejudice scores were obtained from a factor analysis of the scores on various prejudice instruments (racism, sexism, prejudice toward homosexuals, and mentally disabled people), which yielded a one‐factor solution. The best‐fitting causal model, which was our suggested hypothetical model, showed that Big Five personality had no direct effect on Generalized Prejudice but an indirect effect transmitted through RWA and SDO, where RWA seems to capture personality aspects to a greater extent than SDO. Specifically, Generalized Prejudice was affected indirectly by Extraversion, Openness to Experience, and Conscientiousness through RWA, and by Agreeableness through SDO, whereas Neuroticism had no effect at all. The results are discussed against the background of previous research and the personality and social psychology approaches to the study of prejudice. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel‐Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Sanford

R. N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.

Akrami

Ekehammar

Araya

(2000).Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30,521–532.

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.

Allport

G. W.

Kramer

B. M.

(1946).Some roots of prejudice. Journal of Psychology, 22,9–39.

Altemeyer

(1981). Right‐wing authoritarianism. Manitoba, Canada: University Press.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Altemeyer

(1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality.’In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 30, pp.47–92). Orlando, FL: Academic.

Asendorpf

J. B.

(2002).Editorial: The puzzle of personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16,S1–S5.

Asendorpf

J. B.

(2003).Head‐to‐head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 17,327–346.

10.

Bierly

M. M.

(1985).Prejudice toward contemporary outgroups as a generalized attitude. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15,189–199.

11.

Bouchard

T. J.

Loehlin

J. C.

(2001).Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31,243–273.

12.

Clark

L. A.

Watson

(1999). Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. In L. A. Pervin , & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed., pp.399–423). New York: Guilford.

13.

De Raad

Perugini

Hrebickova

Szarota

(1998).Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 29,212–232.

14.

Duckitt

(1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.

15.

Duckitt

(2000). Culture, personality, prejudice. In S. Renshon , & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and crosscultural foundations(pp.89–106). Houndmills, UK: Macmillan.

16.

Duckitt

Wagner

Du Plessis

Birum

(2002).The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,75–93.

17.

Duriez

Van Hiel

(2002).The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32,1199–1213.

18.

Ekehammar

Akrami

(2003).The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable‐ versus a person‐centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17,449–464.

19.

Ekehammar

Akrami

Araya

(2000).Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41,307–314.

20.

Graziano

W. G.

Eisenberg

N. H.

(1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan , J. A. Johnson , & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology(pp.795–824). San Diego, CA: Academic.

21.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

Rudman

L. A.

Farnham

S. D.

Nosek

B. A.

Mellott

D. S.

(2002).A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self‐esteem, and self‐concept. Psychological Review, 109,3–25.

22.

Guimond

(2000).Group socialization and prejudice: The social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30,335–354.

23.

Guimond

Dambrun

Michinov

Duarte

(2003).Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84,697–721.

24.

Hartley

E. L.

(1946). Problems in prejudice. New York: Kings Crown.

25.

Heaven

P. C. L.

Bucci

(2001).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15,49–56.

26.

Heaven

P. C. L.

Connors

J. R.

(2001).A note on the value correlates of social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 31,925–930.

27.

Heaven

P. C. L.

St. Quintin

(2003).Personality factors predict racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 34,625–634.

28.

Hendriks

A. A. J.

(1997). The construction of the Five‐Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Groningen: University Press.

29.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6,1–55.

30.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin , & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed., pp.102–138). New York: Guilford.

31.

Jöreskog

Sörbom

(1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation models with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

32.

Lambert

A. J.

Chasteen

A. L.

(1997).Perceptions of disadvantage vs. conventionality: Political values and attitudes toward the elderly vs. Blacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,469–481.

33.

Lippa

Arad

(1999).Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33,463–493.

34.

McConahay

J. B.

(1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio , & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism(pp.91–126). New York: Academic.

35.

McCourt

Bouchard

T. J.

Lykken

D. T.

Tellegen

Keyes

(1999).Authoritarianism revisited: Genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27,985–1014.

36.

McCrae

R. R.

(1996).Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120,323–337.

37.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five‐factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five‐factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives(pp.51–87). New York: Guilford.

38.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan , J. A. Johnson , & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology(pp.825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic.

39.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1999). A five‐factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin , & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed., pp.139–153). New York: Guilford.

40.

McDonald

R. P.

M. R.

(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7,64–82.

41.

McFarland

S. G.

Ageyev

Abalakina

(1993). The authoritarian personality in the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R.: Comparative studies. In W. F. Stone , G. Lederer , & R. Christie (Eds.), Strengths and weaknesses: The authoritarian personality today(pp.199–228). New York: Springer.

42.

Peterson

B. E.

Smirles

K. A.

Wentworth

P. A.

(1997).Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,1202–1216.

43.

Plomin

Caspi

(1999). Behavior genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin , & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed., pp.251–276). New York: Guilford.

44.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

Malle

(1994).Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,741–763.

45.

Reynolds

K. J.

Turner

J. C.

Haslam

S. A.

Ryan

M. K.

(2001).The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37,427–434.

46.

Rudmin

F. W.

(1999).Norwegian short‐form of the Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40,229–233.

47.

Saucier

Goldberg

L. R.

(1998).What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66,495–524.

48.

Schmitt

M. T.

Branscombe

N. R.

Kappen

D. M.

(2003).Attitudes toward group‐based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42,161–186.

49.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1994).Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50,19–45.

50.

Sears

D. O.

(1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz , & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy(pp.53–84). New York: Plenum.

51.

Sherif

(1967). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge–Kegan Paul.

52.

Shumacker

Lomax

(1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

53.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Sidanius

Pratto

Bobo

(1994).Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,998–1011.

55.

Sidanius

Pratto

Bobo

(1996).Racism, conservatism, affirmative action and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,476–490.

56.

Stöber

(2001).The Social Desirability Scale‐17 (SDS‐17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17,222–232.

57.

Swim

J. K.

Aikin

K. J.

Hall

W. S.

Hunter

B. A.

(1995).Sexism and racism: Old‐fashioned and modern prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,199–214.

58.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel , & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations(pp.7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson‐Hall.

59.

Trapnell

P. D.

(1994).Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8,273–290.

60.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self‐categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

61.

Turner

J. C.

Reynolds

K. J.

(2003).Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42,199–206.

62.

Van Hiel

Kossowska

Mervielde

(2000).The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28,741–751.

63.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(2002).Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32,965–976.

64.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(in press).Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality.

65.

Verkuyten

Hagendoorn

(1998).Prejudice and self‐categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and in‐group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,99–110.

66.

Whitley

B. E.

(1999).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,126–134.

67.

Whitley

B. E.

Ægisdottir

(2000).The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42,947–967.

68.

Whitley

B. E.

Lee

S. E.

(2000).The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,144–170.