In search of the true group animal: the effects of affiliation orientation and social comparison orientation upon group satisfaction

Abstract

A study among 653 undergraduate students examined the effects upon group satisfaction of social comparison orientation (Gibbons & Buunk, 1999) and affiliation orientation, i.e. the preference for doing things together and in groups versus a preference for doing things alone. Affiliation orientation correlated positively with extraversion and agreeableness, and social comparison orientation correlated negatively with emotional stability and openness to experience. A multi‐level analysis showed that individual level variance in group satisfaction was explained by an interaction effect of affiliation orientation and social comparison orientation: a high level of affiliation orientation was associated with high group satisfaction of individual group members, but only among those low in social comparison orientation. Among those high in social comparison orientation, a high level of affiliation orientation was even associated, though not very strongly, with low group satisfaction. These effects were upheld when simultaneously controlling for all ‘Big Five’ personality dimensions. It was concluded that the typical ‘group animal’ is someone who has a strong preference for affiliation, combined with a low tendency to compare him‐ or herself with others. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron

J. N.

Kreps

D. M.

(1999). Strategic human resources. Frameworks for general managers. New York: Wiley.

Brickman

Bulman

R. J.

(1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. Suls , & R. L. L (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives(pp.149–186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Buunk

B. P.

Collins

R. L.

Taylor

S. E.

Van Yperen

N. W.

Dakof

G. A.

(1990).The affective consequences of social comparisons: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,1238–1249.

Buunk

B. P.

(1994). Social comparison processes under stress: Towards an integration of classic and recent perspectives. In W. Stroebe , & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology(Vol. 5, pp.211–241). Chichester: Wiley.

Buunk

B. P.

Brenninkmeijer

(2001).When individuals dislike exposure to an actively coping role model: Mood change as related to depression and social comparison orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31,537–548.

Buunk

B. P.

Oldersma

F. L.

De Dreu

K. W.

(2001a).Enhancing satisfaction through downward comparison: The role of relational discontent and individual differences in social comparison orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37,1–16.

Buunk

B. P.

Van der Zee

K. I.

Van Yperen

N. W.

(2001b).Neuroticism and social comparison orientation as moderators of affective responses to social comparison at work. Journal of Personality, 69,745–763.

Buunk

B. P.

Ybema

J. F.

Gibbons

F. X.

Ipenburg

M. L.

(2001c).The affective consequences of social comparison as related to professional burnout and social comparison orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31,337–351.

Buunk

B. P.

Ybema

J. F.

Van der Zee

Schaufeli

W. B.

Gibbons

F. X.

(2001d).Affect generated by social comparisons among nurses high and low in burnout. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31,1500–1520.

10.

Buunk

B. P.

Zurriaga

Gonzalez‐Roma

Subirats

(2003).Engaging in upward and downward comparisons as a determinant of relative deprivation at work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62,370–388.

11.

Buunk

B. P.

Zurriaga

Peiro

J. M.

Gosalvez

Nauta

(2005).Social comparisons at work as related to a cooperative climate and to individual differences in social comparison orientation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54,61–80.

12.

Cartwright, D. , & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1953). Group dynamics. Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

13.

Collins

R. L.

(1996).For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119,51–69.

14.

Cordery

J. L.

(1996). Autonomous work groups and quality circles. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology(pp.225–246). Chichester: Wiley.

15.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

16.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

Dye

D. A.

(1991).Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12,887–898.

17.

Evans

N. J.

Jarvis

P. A.

(1986).The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17,203–216.

18.

Fagenson

E. A.

(1992).Mentoring: Who needs it? A comparison of proteges' and nonproteges' needs for power, achievement, affiliation, and autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41,48–60.

19.

Fenigstein

Scheier

M. F.

Buss

A. H.

(1975).Public and private self‐consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43,522–527.

20.

Festinger

(1954).A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7,117–140.

21.

Funder

D. C.

(2001). Accuracy in personality judgment: Research and theory concerning an obvious question. In B. W. W , & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace. Decade of behavior(pp.121–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

22.

Gibbons

F. X.

Buunk

B. P.

(1999).Individual differences in social comparison: The development of a measure of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,129–142.

23.

Glantz

Pearce

J. K.

(1989). Exiles from Eden. Psychotherapy from an evolutionary perspective. New York: Norton.

24.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1990).An alternative ‘description of personality’: The Big‐Five structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,1216–1229.

25.

Goldstein

B. S. C.

(1998).Creating a context for collaborative consultation: Working across bicultural communities. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 9,367–374.

26.

Goldstein

Rasbach

Plewis

Draper

Browne

Yang

Woodhouse

Healy

(1998). A user's guide to MLwiN. London: University of London: Institute of Education.

27.

Hackman

J. R.

(1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. W (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior(pp.315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.

28.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

,(1980). Work design. Reading, Mass: Addison‐Wesley.

29.

Hemphill

K. J.

Lehman

D. R.

,(1991).Social comparison and their affective consequences: The importance of comparison dimension and individual variables. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10,372–394.

30.

Hendriks

A. A. J.

(1996).The Big Five as tendencies in situations: A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 21,527–535.

31.

Hendriks

A. A. J.

Hofstee

W. K. B.

de Raad

(1999).The Five‐Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27,307–325.

32.

Hofstee

W. K.

De Raad

Goldberg

L. R.

(1992).Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,146–163.

33.

Hogg

M. A.

(1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

34.

John

O. P.

(1990). The ‘Big Five’ factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. A (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(pp.66–100). New York: Guilford.

35.

Kulik

J. A.

Mahler

H. I. M.

(2000). Social comparison, affiliation, and emotional contagion under threat. In J. Suls , & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology(pp.295–320). New York: Kluwer.

36.

McClelland

D. C.

(1965).Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20,321–333.

37.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

, (1999). A five‐factor theory of personality. In L. A. A , & O. P. P (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed., pp.139–153). New York: Guilford.

38.

Molleman

Pruyn

Van Knippenberg

(1986).Social comparison processes among cancer patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25,1–13.

39.

O' Connor

S. C.

Rosenblood

L. K.

(1996).Affiliation motivation in everyday experience: A theoretical comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,513–522.

40.

Pervin, L. A. , & John, O. P. (Eds.). (1997). Personality: Theory and research(7th ed.). New York: John Wiley.

41.

Ray

J. J.

Hall

G. P.

(1995).Need for affiliation and group identification. Journal of Social Psychology, 135,519–521.

42.

Schachter

(1959). The psychology of affiliation. CA: Stanford University Press.

43.

Sonnentag

(1992). Work group factors and individual well‐being. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology(pp.345–367). Chichester: Wiley.

44.

Steers

R. M.

Braunstein

D. N.

(1976).A behaviorally‐based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9,251–266.

45.

Stroebe

(1996). The social psychology of social support. In E. T. T , & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles(pp.597–621). New York: Guilford.

46.

Taylor

S. E.

Lobel

,(1989).Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96,569–575.

47.

Van der Zee

K. I.

Oldersma

F. L.

Buunk

B. P.

Bos

D. A. J.

(1998).Social comparison preferences among cancer patients as related to neuroticism and social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,801–810.

48.

West

M. A.

(2001). The human team: Basic motivations and innovations. In N. Anderson , D. S. Ones , H. K. Sinangil , & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology(Vol. 2., pp.270–288). London: Sage.

49.

Wills

T. A.

(1981).Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90,245–271.