The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five‐factor model of personality and social attitudes

Abstract

The present research investigates in a student (N = 183) and a voter sample (N = 276) whether the relationships between the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) personality dimensions and social attitudes (i.e. Right‐Wing Authoritarianism [RWA] and Social Dominance Orientation [SDO]) are mediated by social worldviews (i.e. dangerous and jungle worldviews). Two important results were obtained. First, the perception of the world as inherently dangerous and chaotic partially mediated the relationships of the personality dimensions Openness and Neuroticism and the social attitude RWA. Second, the jungle worldview completely mediated the relationships between Agreeableness and SDO, but considerable item overlap between the jungle worldview and SDO was also noted. It was further revealed that acquiescence response set and item overlap had an impact on social worldviews and attitudes, but that their relationships were hardly affected by these biases. The discussion focuses on the status of social worldviews to explain social attitudes. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

authoritarianism Five‐Factor Model political psychology social attitudes Social Dominance Orientation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1981). Right‐wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer

(1988). Enemies of freedom. London: Jossey Bass.

Altemeyer

(1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 30, pp.47–92). San Diego: Academic Press.

Alwin

D. F.

Krosnick

J. A.

(1991).Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97,169–195.

Bass

B. M.

(1955).Authoritarianism or acquiescence? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51,616–623.

Bentler

P. M.

(1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989).A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Research and Methods, 16,492–503.

Brown

(1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.

Butler

J. C. R.

(2000).Personality and emotional correlates of right‐wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28,1–14.

10.

Caprara

G. V.

Barbaranelli

Zimbardo

P. G.

(1999).Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20,175–197.

11.

Cohrs

J. C.

Moschner

Maes

Kielmann

(2005).The motivational bases of right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,1425–1434.

12.

Cornelis

Van Hiel

(2006).The impact of cognitive styles on the development of authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28,37–50.

13.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). NEO PI‐R, Professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

14.

Dollinger

S. J.

Leong

F. T. L.

Ulicni

S. K.

(1996).On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 30,23–41.

15.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual‐process cognitive‐motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 33, pp.41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

16.

Duckitt

Fisher

(2003).The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24,199–222.

17.

Duckitt

Wagner

du Plessis

Birum

(2002).The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,75–93.

18.

Duriez

Soenens

(2006).Personality, identity styles and authoritarianism: An integrative study among late adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 20,397–417.

19.

Duriez

Van Hiel

(2002).The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32,1199–1213.

20.

Duriez

Van Hiel

Kossowska

(2005).Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the socio‐political context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26,299–320.

21.

Ekehammar

Akrami

Gylje

Zakrisson

(2004).What matters most to prejudice: Big‐five personality, social dominance orientation, or authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18,463–482.

22.

Endler

N. S.

Rutherford

Denisoff

(1997).Neuroticism: How does one slice the PI(e)? European Journal of Personality, 11,133–145.

23.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

24.

Heaven

P. C. L.

Bucci

(2001).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality Psychology, 15,49–56.

25.

Hendriks

A. A. J.

Perugini

Angleitner

Ostendorf

Johnson

J. A.

(2003).The five‐factor personality inventory: Cross‐cultural generalizability over 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17,347–373.

26.

Hodson

Sorrentino

R. M.

(1999).Uncertainty orientation and the big five personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 33,253–261.

27.

Hoekstra

H. A.

Ormel

De Fruyt

(1996). NEO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten: NEO‐PI‐R & NEO‐FFI. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

28.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6,1–55.

29.

Huang

L. L.

Liu

J. H.

(2005).Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38,267–276.

30.

Jöreskog

K. G.

Sörbom

(1996). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

31.

Jost

J. T.

Hunyady

(2005).Antecedents and consequences of system‐justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14,260–265.

32.

Judge

T. A.

Erez

Bono

J. E.

Thoresen

C. J.

(2003).The core self‐evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56,303–331.

33.

Knowles

E. S.

Nathan

K. T.

(1997).Acquiescent responding in self‐reports: Cognitive style or social concern? Journal of Research in Personality, 31,293–301.

34.

Leeson

Heaven

P. C. L.

(2000).Social attitudes and personality. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51,19–24.

35.

Lemery

K. S.

Essex

M. J.

Smider

N. A.

(2002).Revealing the relation between temperament and behavior problem symptoms by eliminating measurement confounding: Expert ratings and factor analyses. Child Development, 73,867–882.

36.

Lengua

L. J.

West

S. G.

Sandler

I. N.

(1998).Temperament as a predictor of symptomatology in children: Addressing contamination of measures. Child Development, 69,164–181.

37.

Lipset

(1981). Political man: The social basis of politics. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

38.

McCrae

R. R.

(1996).Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120,323–337.

39.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1985).Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five‐factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6,587–597.

40.

Meloen

J. D.

(1991). Inventarisatie Nederlandse F‐schalen 1959–1990. [List of Dutch F‐scales 1959–1980.]. In P. Scheepers , & R. Eisinga (Eds.), Intolerant en Onderdanig(pp.186–222). Nijmegen, Netherlands: ITS.

41.

Middendorp

(1978). Progressiveness and conservatism. The fundamental dimensions of ideological controversy and their relationship to social class. Den Haag/Paris/New York: Mouton.

42.

Peterson

B. E.

Smirles

K. A.

Wentworth

P. A.

(1997).Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,1202–1216.

43.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994).Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,741–763.

44.

Riemann

Grubich

Hempel

Mergl

Richter

(1993).Personality and attitudes towards current political topics. Personality and Individual Differences, 15,313–321.

45.

Roets

Van Hiel

Cornelis

(2006).Does materialism predict racism? Materialism as a distinctive social attitude and a predictor of prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 20,155–168.

46.

Rokeach

(1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Book Inc., Publishers.

47.

Saucier

(2000).Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,141–154.

48.

Steiger

J. H.

Lind

J. C.

(1980).Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA.

49.

Ten Berge

J. M. F.

(1999).A legitimate case of component analysis of ipsative measures, and partialling the mean as an alternative to ipsatization. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34,89–102.

50.

Trapnell

P. D.

(1994).Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8,273–290.

51.

Van Hiel

Duriez

(2002).Een meetinstrument voor individuele verschillen in Sociale Dominantie Oriëntatie [A scale to measure individual differences in social dominance orientation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psycholgie en, haar Grensgebieden, 57,114–116.

52.

Van Hiel

Kossowska

(in press).Contemporary attitudes and their ideological representation in Flanders (Belgium), Poland and the Ukraine. International Journal of Psychology.

53.

Van Hiel

Kossowska

Mervielde

(2000).The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28,741–751.

54.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(1996a).Personality and current political beliefs. Psychologica Belgica, 36,211–216.

55.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(1996b).The five‐factor model personality dimensions and current political beliefs: An empirical update in a non‐student sample. Unpublished manuscript.

56.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(2004).Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality, 72,659–686.

57.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

De Fruyt

(2004).The relationship between maladaptive personality and right‐wing ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 36,405–417.

58.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

De Fruyt

(2006).Stagnation and generativity: Structure, validity, and differential relationships with adaptive and maladaptive personality. Journal of Personality, 74,543–573.

59.

Van Hiel

Pandelaere

Duriez

(2004).The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,824–837.

60.

Wilson

G. D.

Patterson

J. R.

(1968).A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7,264–269.