The gatekeeper: individual differences are key in the chain from perception to behaviour

Abstract

A basic assumption in mainstream social cognition is that the path from perception to behaviour is often automatic and direct, as supported for example by several experimental studies showing that priming can lead directly to a congruent behaviour without any need of conscious awareness of the process. However, we argue that the priming of a goal or an object activates individual differences in automatic evaluations at the associative level that in turn are the key predictors of action (gatekeeper model). A study (n = 90) on the American stereotype is presented to support the model. The results show that individual differences of the American stereotype as assessed with the IAT predicts a relevant action (essay evaluation) but only under condition of priming. Broader implications for predictive validity of implicit measures are also discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

implicit measures attitudes social cognition automaticity individual differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bargh

J. A.

(1990). Auto‐motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E. T. Higgins , & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition(Vol. 2, pp.93–130). New York: Guilford.

Bargh

J. A.

(2006).What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36,147–168.

Bargh

J. A.

Chaiken

Govender

Pratto

(1992).The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,893–912.

Bargh

J. A.

Chaiken

Raymond

Hymes

(1996).The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic evaluation activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32,104–128.

Bargh

J. A.

Chartrand

T. L.

(1999).The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54,462–479.

Bargh

J. A.

Chen

Burrows

(1996a).Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71,230–244.

Bargh

J. A.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

Lee‐Chai

Bardollar

Trotschel

(2001).The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,1004–1027.

Cesario

Plaks

J. E.

Higgins

E. T.

(2006).Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90,893–910.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1957).The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12,671–684.

10.

De Houwer

(2003).The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50,77–85.

11.

Devine

P. G.

(1989).Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,5–18.

12.

Dijksterhuis

Bargh

J. A.

(2001). The perception‐behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 33, pp.1–40). San Diego: Academic Press.

13.

Duckworth

K. L.

Bargh

J. A.

Garcia

Chaiken

(2002).The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 6,515–519.

14.

Fazio

R. H.

(2001).On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15,115–141.

15.

Fazio

R. H.

Olson

M. A.

(2003).Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54,297–327.

16.

Fazio

R. H.

Sanbonmatsu

D. M.

Powell

M. C.

Kardes

F. R.

(1986).On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50,229–238.

17.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2002).A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,878–902.

18.

Frings

C. G.

Wentura

(2003).Who is watching Big Brother? TV consumption predicted by masked affective priming. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33,779–791.

19.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

(1995).Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self‐esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102,4–27.

20.

Greenwald

A. G.

McGhee

D. E.

Schwartz

J. K. L.

(1998).Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,1464–1480.

21.

Greenwald

A. G.

Nosek

B. A.

Banaji

M. R.

(2003).Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85,197–216.

22.

Higgins

E. T.

(1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins , & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles(pp.133–168). New York: Guilford.

23.

Higgins

E. T.

Rholes

W. S.

Jones

C. R.

(1977).Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13,141–154.

24.

Hofmann

Rauch

Gawronski

(in press).And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self‐regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

25.

Katz

Braly

K. W.

(1933).Racial stereotypes of one‐hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28,280–290.

26.

Kenrick

D. T.

Funder

D. C.

(1988).Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person‐situation debate. American Psychologist, 43,23–34.

27.

Madon

Guyll

Aboufadel

Montiel

Smith

Palumbo

. (2001).Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,996–1010.

28.

Mischel

(1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

29.

Nosek

B. A.

Banaji

M. R.

(2001).The go/no‐go association task. Social Cognition, 19,625–666.

30.

Nosek

B. A.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

(2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior(pp.265–292). Psychology Press.

31.

Payne

B. K.

Cheng

C. M.

Govorun

Stewart

(2005).An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89,277–293.

32.

Perugini

(2005).Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44,29–45.

33.

Perugini

Conner

O'Gorman

(2007).The interplay between implicit and explicit attitudes: The case of spontaneous helping. Unpublished manuscript.

34.

Perugini

O'Gorman

Prestwich

(2007).An ontological test of the IAT: Self‐activation can increase predictive validity. Experimental Psychology, 54,134–147.

35.

Strack

Deutsch

(2004).Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8,220–247.

36.

Strack

Schwarz

Bless

Kuebler

Wanke

(1993).Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23,53–62.

37.

Wilson

T. D.

Lindsey

Schooler

(2000).A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107,101–126.

38.

Winter

Uleman

J. S.

(1984).When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,237–252.