Reactions to daily events as a function of familiarity with an environment

Abstract

Undergraduate participants provided measures of their psychological well‐being and described the positive and negative events that occurred each day, once during the first and second semesters of an academic year. For four of the five measures of daily well‐being, reactivity to negative events decreased from the first to second semester, whereas for four of the five measures of well‐being, reactivity to positive events did not change over the year. These results suggest that familiarity with an environment moderates reactivity to negative daily events. As people become more familiar with an environment, negative events may elicit smaller decreases in well‐being. In contrast, increases in well‐being elicited by positive events appear to be unrelated to familiarity with the environment. More broadly, these differences suggest that the reactivity to positive and negative events reflect the operation of different processes. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

multilevel analysis within‐person variability daily events

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alloy

L. B.

Kelly

K. A.

Mineka

Clements

C. M.

(1990). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: A helplessness‐hopelessness perspective. In J. D. Maser , & C. R. Cloninger (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders(pp.499–544). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Abouguendia

Noels

K. A.

(2001).General and acculturation‐related daily hassles and psychological adjustment in first‐ and second‐generation South Asian immigrants to Canada. International Journal of Psychology, 36,163–173.

Beck

A. T.

(1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

Bolger

Zuckerman

(1995).A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,890–902.

Brand

Felner

Shim

Seitsinger

Dumas

(2002).Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school‐level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95,570–588.

Bryk

A. S.

Raudenbush

S. W.

(1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Butler

A. C.

Hokanson

J. E.

Flynn

H. A.

(1994).A comparison of self‐esteem lability and low trait self‐esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,166–177.

David

J. P.

Green

P. J.

Martin

Suls

(1997).Differential roles of neuroticism, extraversion, and event desirability for mood in daily life: An integrative model of top‐down and bottom‐up influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,149–159.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985).The general causality orientations scale: Self‐determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19,109–134.

10.

Gable

S. L.

Reis

H. T.

Elliot

A. J.

(2000).Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,1135–1149.

11.

Gray

J. A.

(1987). The psychology of fear and stress(2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Maier

G. W.

Brunstein

J. C.

(2001).The role of personal work goals in newcomers' job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,1034–1042.

13.

Nezlek

J. B.

(1993).The stability of social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,930–942.

14.

Nezlek

J. B.

(2001).Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event and interval contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,771–785.

15.

Nezlek

J. B.

(2005).Distinguishing affective and non‐affective reactions to daily events. Journal of Personality, 73,1539–1568.

16.

Nezlek

J. B.

Allen

M. R.

(2006).Social support as a moderator of day‐to‐day relationships between daily negative events and daily psychological well‐being. European Journal of Personality, 20,53–68.

17.

Nezlek

J. B.

Gable

S. L.

(2001).Depression as a moderator of relationships between positive daily events and day‐to‐day psychological adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,1692–1704.

18.

Nezlek

J. B.

Plesko

R. M.

(2003).Affect‐ and self‐based models of relationships between daily events and daily well‐being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,584–596.

19.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

Congdon

R. T.

(2000). HLM. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

20.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self‐image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

21.

Schneider

(1988).Micro experimental laboratory: An integrated system for IBM‐PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20,206–217.

22.

Stewart

A. J.

(1982).The course of individual adaptation to life changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42,1100–1113.

23.

Suls

Martin

David

J. P.

(1998).Person‐environment fit and its limits: Agreeableness, neuroticism, and emotional reactivity to interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,88–97.

24.

Watson

Tellegen

(1985).Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98,219–235.

25.

Weary

Jordan

J. S.

Hill

M. G.

(1985).The attributional norm of internality and depressive sensitivity to social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49,1283–1293.

26.

Weary

Edwards

J. A.

(1994).Individual differences in causal uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,308–318.