Moderating effects of personality on the genetic and environmental influences of school grades helps to explain sex differences in scholastic achievement

Abstract

Girls consistently achieve higher grades than boys despite scoring lower on major standardized tests and not having higher IQs. Sex differences in non‐cognitive variables such as personality might help to account for sex differences in grades. Utilizing a large sample of 17‐year‐old twins participating in the Minnesota Twin Family Study (MTFS), we examined the roles of Achievement Striving, Self‐Control and Aggression on sex differences in grade point average (GPA). Each personality trait was a significant predictor of GPA, with sex differences in Aggression accounting for one‐half the sex difference in GPA and genetic variance accounting for most of the overlap between personality and GPA. Achievement Striving and Self‐Control moderated the genetic and environmental influences on GPA. Specifically, for girls but not boys, higher Achievement Striving and Self‐Control were associated with less variability in GPA and greater genetic and environmental overlap with GPA. For girls, certain personality traits operate to shape a context yielding uniformly higher GPA, a process that seems absent in boys. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

grade point average personality sex differences gene–environment interactions and correlations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike

(1983).Information measures and model selection. Bulletin of Statistical Institute, 50,277–290.

American Association of University Women. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. New York: Marlowe.

Bartels

Rietveld

M. J. H.

Van Baal

G. C. M.

Boomsma

D. I.

(2002).Heritability of educational achievement in 12‐year‐olds and the overlap with cognitive ability. Twin Research, 5,544–553.

Blonigen

D. M.

Carlson

M. D.

Hicks

B. M.

Krueger

R. F.

Iacono

W. G.

(2008).Developmental trends in personality traits from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal‐twin study. Journal of Personality(in press).

Bouchard

T. J.

Loehlin

J. C.

(2001).Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31,243–273.

Bureau of Census. (2000). Current population survey (10/00). Washington, DC: United States Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

Dye

D. A.

(1991).Facet scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A revision to the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12,887–898.

Deary

I. J.

Strand

Smith

Fernandes

(2007).Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35,13–21.

Doherty

J. D.

Lancaster

P. L.

(1986).The secular trend of twining in Australia, 1853–1982. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 35,61–76.

10.

Duckworth

A. L.

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2005).Self‐discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16,939–944.

11.

Duckworth

A. L.

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2006).Self‐discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self‐discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98,198–208.

12.

Entwisle

D. R.

Alexander

K. L.

Olson

J. M.

(1994).The gender gap in math: Its possible origin in neighborhood effects. American Sociological Review, 59,822–838.

13.

Hinshaw

S. P.

(1992).Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111,127–155.

14.

Hollingshead

A. B.

(1957). Two factor index of social position. New Haven, CT: August B. Hollingshead.

15.

Hur

Y. M.

McGue

Iacono

W. G.

(1995).Unequal rate of monozygotic and like‐sex dizygotic twin birth. Evidence from the Minnesota Twin Family Study. Behavior Genetics, 25,337–340.

16.

Iacono

W. G.

McGue

(2002).Minnesota Twin Family Study. Twin Research, 5,482–487.

17.

Iacono

W. G.

Carlson

S. R.

Taylor

Elkins

I. J.

McGue

(1999).Behavioral disinhibition and the development of substance use disorders: Findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study. Development and Psychopathology, 11,869–900.

18.

Johnson

(2007).Genetic and environmental influences on behavior: Capturing all the interplay. Psychological Review, 114,423–440.

19.

Johnson

Krueger

R. F.

(2006).How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90,680–691.

20.

Johnson

Deary

I. J.

Iacono

W. G.

(2007).Genetic and environmental selection processes underlying educational attainment: Something for everyone but everything for none(submitted for publication).

21.

Johnson

McGue

Iacono

W. G.

(2005).Disruptive behavior and school achievement: Genetic and environmental relationships in 11‐year‐olds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97,391–405.

22.

Johnson

McGue

Iacono

W. G.

(2006).Genetic and environmental influences on academic achievement trajectories during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 42,514–532.

23.

Kimball

M. M.

(1989).A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105,198–214.

24.

Krueger

R. F.

Johnson

(2007). Behavioral genetics and personality: A new look at the integration of nature and nurture. In O. P. John , R. W. Robins , & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(3rd ed., pp. in press). New York: Guilford.

25.

Krueger

R. F.

Caspi

Moffitt

T. E.

Silva

P. A.

McGee

(1996).Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: A multitrait‐multidiagnosis study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105,299–312.

26.

Krueger

R. F.

Schmutte

P. S.

Caspi

Moffitt

T. E.

Campbell

Silva

P. A.

(1994).Personality traits are linked to crime among men and women: Evidence from a birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103,328–338.

27.

Lever

(1978).Sex differences in the complexity of children's play and games. American Sociological Review, 43,471–483.

28.

Little

R. J. A.

Rubin

D. B.

(1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.

29.

Loewen

J. W.

Rosser

Katzman

(1988). Gender bias in SAT items. New Orleans, LA: American Educational Research Association.

30.

Lykken

D. T.

Bouchard

T. J.

McGue

Tellegen

(1990).The Minnesota twin family registry: Some initial findings. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 39,35–70.

31.

Mau

Lynn

(2001).Gender differences on the Scholastic Aptitude Test, the American College Test, and college grades. Educational Psychology, 21,133–136.

32.

McGue

Bouchard

T. J.

(1984).Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14,325–343.

33.

Miller

J. D.

Lynam

Leukefeld

(2003).Examining antisocial behavior through the lens of the Five Factor Model of personality. Aggressive Behavior, 29,497–514.

34.

Moffitt

T. E.

Caspi

Rutter

Silva

P. A.

(2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Muthen

L. K.

Muthen

B. O.

(2004). Mplus user's guide(3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

36.

Neale

M. C.

Boker

S. M.

Xie

Maes

H. H.

(2002).Mx: Statistical Modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA, 23298: Department of Psychiatry (6th ed.).

37.

Noftle

E. E.

Robins

R. W.

(2007).Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93,116–130.

38.

Pallas

A. M.

Alexander

K. L.

(1983).Sex differences in quantitative SAT performance: New evidence on the differential course‐work hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 20,165–182.

39.

Perkins

Kleiner

Roey

Brown

(2004).The High School Transcript Study: A decade of change in curriculum and achievement, 1990–2000(Report No. NCES 2004455). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

40.

Plomin

Bergeman

C. S.

(1991).The nature of nurture: Genetic influences on “environmental” variables. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14,373–427.

41.

Plomin

DeFries

McClearn

McGuffin

(2001). Behavioral genetics. New York: Freeman.

42.

Pomerantz

E. M.

Alterman

E. R.

Saxon

J. L.

(2002).Making the grade but feeling distressed: Gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94,396–404.

43.

Purcell

(2002).Variance component models for gene‐environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research, 5,554–571.

44.

Roberts

B. W.

Chernyshenko

O. S.

Stark

Goldberg

L. R.

(2005).The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58,103–139.

45.

Roberts

B. W.

Caspi

Moffitt

T. E.

(2001).The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,670–683.

46.

Rowe

D. C.

(2003). Assessing genotype‐environmental interactions and correlations in the post‐genomic era. In R. Plomin , J. C. DeFries , & I. W. Craig (Eds.), Behavioral genetics in the post‐genomic era(pp.71–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

47.

Schwartz

(1978).Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6,461–464.

48.

Sclove

L. S.

(1987).Application of model‐selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52,333–343.

49.

Shiner

R. L.

(1998).How shall we speak of children's personalities in middle childhood? A preliminary taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 124,308–322.

50.

Shiner

R. L.

(2000).Linking childhood personality with adaptation: Evidence for continuity and change across time into late adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,310–325.

51.

Spinath

F. M.

Spinath

Plomin

(2004).Predicting school achievement from intelligence, ability, self‐perception, and intrinsic values: Phenotypic and genetic analyses in a large twin study of 9‐year‐olds. Behavior Genetics, 34,661.

52.

Steele

C. M.

(1997).A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52,613–629.

53.

Stricker

L. J.

Riock

D. A.

Burton

N. W.

(1993).Sex differences in predictions of college grades from Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85,710–718.

54.

Tangney

J. P.

Baumeister

R. F.

Boone

A. I.

(2004).High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72,271–322.

55.

Tellegen

Waller

N. G.

(1992).Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

56.

Tellegen

(in press). Manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

57.

Wagerman

S. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2007).Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 41,221–229.

58.

Wainwright

M. A.

Wright

M. J.

Luciano

Geffen

G. M.

Martin

N. G.

(2005).Multivariate genetic analysis of academic skills of the Queensland Core Skills Test and IQ highlight the importance of genetic g. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8,602–608.

59.

Walker

S. O.

Petrill

S. A.

Spinath

F. M.

Plomin

(2004).Nature, nurture, and academic achievement: A twin study of teacher assessments of 7‐year‐olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74,323–342.

60.

Webb

(1915). Character and intelligence: An attempt at an exact study of character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

61.

Whipple

G. M.

(1922). The national intelligence tests. Illinois: The Public School.

62.

Willingham

Cole

(1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.