How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name‐letter task

Abstract

Although the name‐letter task (NLT) has become an increasingly popular technique to measure implicit self‐esteem (ISE), researchers have relied on different algorithms to compute NLT scores and the psychometric properties of these differently computed scores have never been thoroughly investigated. Based on 18 independent samples, including 2690 participants, the current research examined the optimality of five scoring algorithms based on the following criteria: reliability; variability in reliability estimates across samples; types of systematic error variance controlled for; systematic production of outliers and shape of the distribution of scores. Overall, an ipsatized version of the original algorithm exhibited the most optimal psychometric properties, which is recommended for future research using the NLT. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

name‐letter task initial preference task implicit self‐esteem reliability validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baccus

J. R.

Baldwin

M. W.

Packer

D. J.

(2004).Increasing implicit self‐esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15,498–502.

Bornstein

R. F.

(1989).Exposure and affect: Overview and meta‐analysis of research 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106,265–289.

Bosson

J. K.

Brown

R. P.

Zeigler‐Hill

Swann

W. B.

(2003).Self‐enhancement tendencies among people with high explicit self‐esteem: The moderating role of implicit self‐esteem. Self and Identity, 2,169–187.

Bosson

J. K.

Lakey

C. E.

Campbell

W. K.

Zeigler‐Hill

Jordan

C. H.

Kernis

M. H.

(2008).Untangling the links between narcissism and self‐esteem: A theoretical and empirical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2,1415–1439.

Bosson

J. K.

Swann

W. B.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2000).Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self‐esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,631–643.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

De Raedt

Schacht

Franck

De Houwer

(2006).Self‐esteem and depression revisited: Implicit positive self‐esteem in depressed patients? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44,1017–1028.

Dijksterhuis

(2004).I like myself but I don't know why: Enhancing implicit self‐esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86,345–355.

Duckworth

K. L.

Bargh

J. A.

Garcia

Chaiken

(2002).The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13,513–519.

10.

Fazio

R. H.

Jackson

J. R.

Dunton

B. C.

Williams

C. J.

(1995).Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,1013–1027.

11.

Franck

De Raedt

De Houwer

(2007).Implicit but not explicit self‐esteem predicts future depressive symptomatology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45,2448–2455.

12.

Gawronski

(2009).Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers. Canadian Psychology.DOI:10.1037/a0013848

13.

Gawronski

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2006).Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132,692–731.

14.

Gawronski

Bodenhausen

G. V.

Becker

(2007).I like it, because I like myself: Associative self‐anchoring and post‐decisional change of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43,221–232.

15.

Gebauer

J. E.

Riketta

Broemer

Maio

(2008).How much do you like your name? An implicit measure of global self‐esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44,1346–1354.

16.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

(1995).Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self‐esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102,4–27.

17.

Greenwald

A. G.

Farnham

S. D.

(2000).Using the implicit association test to measure self‐esteem and self‐concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,1022–1038.

18.

Hetts

J. J.

Sakuma

Pelham

B. W.

(1999).Two roads to positive regard: Implicit and explicit self‐evaluation and culture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35,512–559.

19.

Hofmann

Gawronski

Gschwendner

Schmitt

(2005a).A meta‐analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self‐report measure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,1369–1385.

20.

Hofmann

Gschwendner

Nosek

B. A.

Schmitt

(2005b).What moderates explicit‐implicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16,335–390.

21.

Jackson

D. N.

Messick

(1958).Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 55,243–252.

22.

Jones

J. T.

Pelham

B. W.

Mirenberg

(2002).Name letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self‐regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38,170–177.

23.

Kitayama

Karasawa

(1997).Implicit self‐esteem in Japan: Name letters and birthday numbers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,736–742.

24.

Krause

Metzler

(1984). Angewandte Statistik [Applied statistics]. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

25.

Krizan

(2008).What is implicit about implicit self‐esteem? The case of the name‐letter effect. Journal of Research in Personality.DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.002

26.

Krizan

Suls

(2008).Are implicit and explicit measures of self‐esteem related? A meta‐analysis for the name‐letter test. Personality and Individual Differences, 44,521–531.

27.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1982). Reliability of measurement. In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research(pp.1589–1601). New York: Free Press.

28.

Nuttin

M. J.

(1985).Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 64,723–739.

29.

Nuttin

M. J.

(1987).Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17,381–402.

30.

Payne

B. K.

Cheng

S. M.

Govorun

Stewart

B. D.

(2005).An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89,277–293.

31.

Pelham

B. W.

Koole

S. L.

Hardin

C. D.

Hetts

J. J.

Seah

DeHart

(2005).Gender moderates the relation between implicit and explicit self‐esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41,84–89.

32.

Raskin

Terry

(1988).A principal‐components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,890–902.

33.

Riketta

(2005).Gender and socially desirable responding as moderators of the correlation between implicit and explicit self‐esteem. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11,14–28.

34.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self‐image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

35.

Sakellaropuollo

Baldwin

M. W.

(2007).The hidden sides of self‐esteem: Two dimensions of implicit self‐esteem and their relation to narcissistic reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43,995–1001.

36.

Schröder‐Abé

Rudolph

Wiesner

Schütz

(2007).Self‐esteem discrepancies and defensive reaction to social feedback. International Journal of Psychology, 42,174–183.

37.

Schwarz

(1990). Feelings as information: Informational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins , & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior(Vol 2, pp.527–561). New York: Guilford Press.

38.

Shimizu

Pelham

B. W.

(2004).The unconscious cost of good fortune: Implicit and explicit self‐esteem, positive life events, and health. Health Psychology, 23,101–105.

39.

Steiger

J. H.

(1980a).Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87,245–251.

40.

Steiger

J. H.

(1980b).Testing pattern hypotheses on correlation matrices: Alternative statistics and some empirical results. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15,335–352.

41.

Tracy

J. L.

Cheng

J. T.

Robins

R. W.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

(in press).Authentic and hubristic pride: The affective core of self‐esteem and narcissism. Self and Identity.

42.

Vasu

E. S.

Elmore

P. B.

(1975).The effects of multicollinearity and the violation of the assumption of normality on the testing of hypotheses in regression analysis. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 6,21–50.

43.

Verplanken

Friborg

Wang

C. E.

Trafimow

Woolf

(2007).Mental habits: Metacognitive reflection on negative self‐thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92,526–541.

44.

Watson

(1988).Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,1020–1030.