Inter‐ and intrapersonal processes underlying authoritarianism: The role of social conformity and personal need for structure

Abstract

Several personality constructs have been theorised to underlie right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA). In samples from New Zealand and Germany (Ns = 218, 259), we tested whether these constructs can account for specific variance in RWA. In both samples, social conformity and personal need for structure were independent predictors of RWA. In Sample 2, where also openness to experience was measured, social conformity and personal need for structure fully mediated the impact of the higher‐order factor of openness on RWA. Our results contribute to the integration of current approaches to the personality basis of authoritarianism and suggest that two distinct personality processes contribute to RWA: An interpersonal process related to social conformity and an intrapersonal process related to rigid cognitive style. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

right‐wing‐authoritarianism social conformity personal need for structure openness to experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel‐Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Sanford

R. N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

Akrami

Ekehammar

(2006).Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in big‐five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 27,117–126.

Altemeyer

(1981). Right‐wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: The University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer

(1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right‐wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass/Pfeiffer.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Altemeyer

(1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 30, pp.47–91). San Diego: Academic Press.

Asendorpf

J. B.

van Aken

M. A. G.

(2003).Personality‐relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71,629–666.

Cattell

R. B.

(1966).The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behaviorial Research, 1,245–276.

Cohrs

J. C.

Asbrock

(2009).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39,270–289.

10.

Cohrs

J. C.

Maes

Moschner

Kielmann

(2007).Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Political Psychology, 28,441–469.

11.

Cornelis

Van Hiel

(2006).The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28,37–50.

12.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI‐R) and NEO five factor inventory. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

13.

Cunningham

W. A.

Nezlek

J. B.

Banaji

M. R.

(2004).Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,1332–1346.

14.

DeYoung

C. G.

Quilty

L. C.

Peterson

J. B.

(2007).Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93,880–896.

15.

Doty

R. M.

Peterson

B. E.

Winter

D. G.

(1991).Threat and authoritarianism in the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61,629–640.

16.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual‐process cognitive‐motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 33, pp.41–113). San Diego: Academic Press.

17.

Duckitt

Bizumic

(2009).A tripartite model of authoritarian attitudes: The authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism model. Manuscript submitted for publication.

18.

Duckitt

Fisher

(2003).The impact of social threat on world view and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24,199–222.

19.

Duckitt

Sibley

(2009). A dual process model of ideological attitudes and system justification. In J. T. Jost , A. C. Kay , & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification(pp.292–313). New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Duckitt

Wagner

du Plessis

Birum

(2002).The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,75–93.

21.

Ekehammar

Akrami

(2007).Personality and prejudice: From big five personality factors to facets. Journal of Personality, 75,899–925.

22.

Ekehammar

Akrami

Gylje

Zakrisson

(2004).What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right‐wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 18,463–482.

23.

Funke

(2005).The dimensionality of right‐wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26,195–218.

24.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1993).The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48,26–34.

25.

Heaven

P. C. L.

Bucci

(2001).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15,49–56.

26.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003).Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129,339–375.

27.

Jugert

Duckitt

(2009).A motivational model of authoritarianism: Integrating personal and situational determinants. Political Psychology, 30,693–719.

28.

Jugert

Hiemisch

(2005).Terrorismusbedrohung und sozial‐kognitive Motive als Prädiktoren von konservativen Einstellungen. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 13,137–158.

29.

Kessler

Cohrs

J. C.

(2008).The evolution of authoritarian processes: Fostering cooperation in large‐scale groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12,73–84.

30.

Kossowska

Van Hiel

(2003).The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24,501–518.

31.

Lippa

Arad

(1999).Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33,463–493.

32.

Machunsky

Meiser

(2006).Personal Need for Structure als differenzialpsychologisches Konstrukt in der Sozialpsychologie: Psychometrische Analyse und Validierung einer deutschsprachigen PNS‐Skala. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 37,87–97.

33.

McCann

S. J.

(1999).Threatening times and fluctuations in American church memberships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25,325–336.

34.

McCrae

R. R.

(1996).Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120,323–337.

35.

Neuberg

S. L.

Newsom

J. T.

(1993).Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65,113–131.

36.

Ostendorf

(1996). The structure of attitudes and its relation to the Big‐Five factors of personality.Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Psychology, Montréal, Canada, 16–22 August.

37.

Ostendorf

Angleitner

(2004). NEO‐Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, revidierte Fassung (NEO‐PI‐R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

38.

Parkins

I. S.

Fishbein

H. D.

Ritchey

P. N.

(2006).The influence of personality on workplace bullying and discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36,2554–2577.

39.

Petersen

L.‐E.

Dietz

(2000).Social discrimination in a personnel selection context: The effects of an authority's instruction to discriminate and followers' authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,206–220.

40.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1999).Placing authoritarianism in social context. Politics, Groups, and the Individual, 8,5–20.

41.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008).Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40,879–891.

42.

Reips

U.‐D.

(2001).The web experimental psychology lab: Five years of data collection on the internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33,201–211.

43.

Rokeach

(1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Free Press.

44.

Sales

S. M.

(1972).Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23,420–428.

45.

Saucier

(1994).Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,141–154.

46.

Schafer

(1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.

47.

Schultz

P. W.

Searleman

(2002).Rigidity of thought and behavior: 100 years of research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128,165–207.

48.

Schultz

P. W.

Stone

W. F.

Christie

(1997).Authoritarianism and mental rigidity: The Einstellung problem revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,3–9.

49.

Sibley

Duckitt

(2008).Personality and prejudice: A meta‐analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12,248–279.

50.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics(4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

51.

Van Hiel

Cornelis

Roets

(2007).The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five‐factor Model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21,131–148.

52.

Van Hiel

Cornelis

Roets

De Clercq

(2007).A comparison of various authoritarianism scales in Belgian flanders. European Journal of Personality, 21,149–168.

53.

Van Hiel

De Cremer

Stouten

(2008).The personality basis of justice: The five‐factor model as an integrative model of personality and procedural fairness effects on cooperation. European Journal of Personality, 22,519–539.

54.

Van Hiel

Kossowska

Mervielde

(2000).The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality & Individual Differences, 28,741–751.

55.

Van Hiel

Mervielde

(2004).Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality, 72,659–686.

56.

Van Hiel

Pandelaere

Duriez

(2004).The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,824–837.

57.

Webster

D. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(1994).Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,1049–1062.

58.

Webster

D. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(1998).Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. European Review of Social Psychology, 8,133–173.

59.

Whitley

B. E.

, (1999).Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,126–134.