Capturing the Structure of Distinct Types of Individual Differences in the Situation–Specific Experience of Emotions: The Case of Anger

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to understand why some people experience certain emotions in a specific situation, whereas others do not. We postulate that these individual differences arise from individual differences in two underlying processes of emotion elicitation: (i) individual differences in the emotion components (appraisals and action tendencies) that situations activate in a person and (ii) individual differences in how these emotion components are related to subjective emotional experience. In this paper, we re–analysed data from two studies on anger to capture the structure of these two types of individual differences by using clustering modelling techniques. Consistent results across the two studies demonstrated that individuals differ in anger because they (i) differ in how easy they experience anger–relevant appraisals (Studies 1 and 2) and action tendencies (Study 2) in increasingly negative situations and (ii) differ in which of these components are necessary to experience anger. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

statistical methods antisocial behaviour anger personality types emotions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkowitz

, & Harmon–Jones

(2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4, 107–130.

Ceulemans

, & Kiers

H. A. L.

(2006). Selecting among three–mode principal component models of different types and complexities: A numerical convex hull based method. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 133–150.

Ceulemans

, & Kiers

H. A. L.

(2009). Discriminating between strong and weak structures in three–mode principal component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 601–620.

Ceulemans

, & Van Mechelen

(2008). CLASSI: A classification model for the study of sequential processes and individual differences therein. Psychometrika, 73, 107–124.

Ceulemans

, Van Mechelen

, & Leenen

(2003). Tucker3 hierarchical classes analysis. Psychometrika, 68, 413–433.

De Sarbo

W. S.

, Oliver

R. L.

, & Rangaswamy

(1989). A simulated annealing methodology for clusterwise linear regression. Psychometrika, 54, 707–736.

Ellsworth

P. C.

, & Smith

C. A.

(1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 271–303.

Ellsworth

P. C.

, & Tong

E. M. W.

(2006). What does it mean to be angry at yourself? Categories, appraisals, and the problem of language. Emotion, 6, 572–586.

Frijda

N. H.

(1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Frijda

N. H.

(1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 357–387.

11.

Frijda

N. H.

(2009). Emotion experience and its varieties. Emotion Review, 1, 264–271.

12.

Griner

L. A.

, & Smith

C. A.

(2000). Contributions of motivational orientation to appraisal and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 727–740.

13.

Gross

J. J.

(1999). Emotion and emotion regulation. In Pervin

L. A.

, & John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd edn) (pp. 525–552). New York: Guilford Press.

14.

Hazebroek

J. F.

, Howells

, & Day

(2001). Cognitive appraisals associated with high trait anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 31–45.

15.

Kassinove

, & Eckhardt

C. I.

(1994). Self–reported affect and irrational beliefs in Russia and America. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 133–142.

16.

Kroonenberg

P. M.

(2008). Applied multiway data analysis. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.

17.

Kuppens

, & Tong

E. M. W.

(2010). An appraisal account of individual differences in emotional experiences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1138–1150.

18.

Kuppens

, & Van Mechelen

(2007). Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened self–esteem, other–blame, and frustration. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 56–77.

19.

Kuppens

, Van Mechelen

, & Rijmen

(2008). Towards disentangling sources of individual differences in the experience of anger. Journal of Personality, 76, 969–1000.

20.

Kuppens

, Van Mechelen

, Smits

D. J. M.

, & De Boeck

(2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 3, 254–269.

21.

Kuppens

, Van Mechelen

, Smits

D. J. M.

, De Boeck

, & Ceulemans

(2007). Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 689–713.

22.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1994). Individual differences in emotion. In Ekman

, & Davidson

R. J.

(Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 332–336). New York: Oxford University Press.

24.

Lerner

J. S.

, & Keltner

(2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion–specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.

25.

Lerner

J. S.

, & Keltner

(2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.

26.

Lerner

J. S.

, & Tiedens

L. Z.

(2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115–137.

27.

Muran

J. C.

, Kassinove

, Ross

, & Muran

(1989). Irrational thinking and negative emotionality in college students and applicants for mental health services. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 188–193.

28.

Ortony

, Clore

G. L.

, & Collins

(1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

29.

van der Ploeg

H. M.

, Defares

P. B.

, & Spielberger

C. D.

(1982). Zelf–analyse vragenlijst [Trait Anger Scale]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

30.

Reisenzein

(2000). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1–38.

31.

Reisenzein

(2009). Emotional experience in the Computational Belief–Desire Theory of Emotion. Emotion Review, 1, 214–222.

32.

Robinson

M. D.

, & Clore

G. L.

(2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1520–1532.

33.

Roseman

I. J.

, & Smith

C. A.

(2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In Scherer

K. R.

, Schorr

, & Johnstone

(Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

34.

Schepers

, Van Mechelen

, & Ceulemans

(2006). Three–mode partitioning. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 1623–1642.

35.

Scherer

K. R.

(1993). Studying the emotion–antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 325–355.

36.

Scherer

K. R.

, Schorr

, & Johnstone

(2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press.

37.

Silvia

P. J.

(2005). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 119–133.

38.

Silvia

P. J.

, Henson

R. A.

, & Templin

J. L.

(2009). Are the sources of interest the same for everyone? Using multilevel mixture models to explore individual differences in appraisal structures. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1389–1406.

39.

Smith

C. A.

, & Lazarus

R. S.

(1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269.

40.

Smith

C. A.

, & Pope

L. K.

(1992). Appraisal and emotion: The interactional contributions of dispositional and situational factors. In Clark

M. S.

(Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, volume 14: Emotion and social behavior (pp. 32–62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

41.

Solomon

R. C.

(1988). On emotions as judgments. AmericanPhilosophical Quarterly, 25, 183–191.

42.

Tong

E. M. W.

(2010a). The sufficiency and necessity of appraisals for negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 692–701.

43.

Tong

E. M. W.

(2010b). Personality influences in appraisal–emotion relationships: The role of Neuroticism. Journal of Personality, 78, 393–417.

44.

Van Mechelen

, & Hennes

(2009). The appraisal basis of anger occurrence and intensity revisited. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1373–1388.

45.

Vande Gaer

, Ceulemans

, Van Mechelen

, & Kuppens

(in press). The CLASSI–N model for the study of sequential processes. Psychometrika.

46.

Vansteelandt

, & Van Mechelen

(2006). Individual differences in anger and sadness: In pursuit of active situational features and psychological processes. Journal of Personality, 74, 871–909.