This article presents the results of an undergraduate project to develop a project management model for integration into a government research and development (GR&D) organization. The project was divided into three main phases: literature review, creation and execution of an organizational culture survey, and the development of a project management model compatible with GR&D organizations. It was found that, although there are cultural gaps between the GR&D and project management cultures, it is possible to bridge these gaps by a combination of training, organizational structure, and the application of project management techniques blended to match the type of research project and fundamental cultural assumptions.
AndersonE. S., & JessenS. A. (2003). Project maturity in organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 457–461.
2.
BrownC. J. (1999). Can research be project managed?South African Journal of Business Management, 30(3), 72–77.
3.
ClarkeT. E. (2002a). Unique features of an R&D work environment and research scientists and engineers. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 15(3), 58–69.
4.
ClarkeT. E. (2002b). Why do we still not apply what we know about managing R&D personnel?Research Technology Management, 45(2), 9–11.
5.
Cooke-DaviesT., & ArzymanowA. (2003). The maturity of project management in different industries: An investigation into variations between project management models. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 471–478.
6.
CruikshankA., & HolbrookA. (2002). The 1994 federal science and technology review. Centre for Policy Research on Science and Technology—Simon Fraser University at Harbour Centre. Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://www.sfu.ca/cprost/docs/0200.pdf
7.
Department of Finance. (2006). The budget plan 2006focusing on priorities. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.fin.gc.ca/
8.
DvirD., ShenharA. J., & AlkaherS. (2003). From a single discipline product to a multidisciplinary system: Adapting the right style to the right project. Systems Engineering, 6(3), 123–134.
9.
FirthG., & KrutR. (1991). Introducing a project management culture. European Management Journal, 9, 437–443.
10.
GrahamR. (1998). Managing the project management process in aerospace and construction: A comparative approach. International Journal of Project Management, 17(1), 39–45.
Industry Canada. (1996). Science and technology for the new century. A federal strategy. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSE/te/e-strat96.pdf
JohnsG. (1996). Organizational behavior: Understanding and managing life at work (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
18.
JordanG. B. (2005). What matters to R&D workers. Research Technology Management, 48(3), 23–32.
19.
KendraK., & TaplinL. J. (2004). Project success: A cultural framework. Project Management Journal, 35(1), 30–45.
20.
KerznerH. (1998). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
21.
KwakY. H., & IbbsC. W. (2002). Project management process maturity (PM)2 model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), 150–155.
22.
LarsonE. R. (2005). Apply project management to R&D. Chemical Engineering Progress, 101(1), 47–50.
23.
LeviD., & SlemC. (1995). Team work in research and development organizations: The characteristics of successful teams. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 16(1), 29–42.
24.
MaccobyM. (2006). Is there a best way to lead scientists and engineers?Research Technology Management, 49(1), 60–61.
25.
MartinsuoM., HensmanN., ArttoK., KujalaJ., & JaafariA. (2006). Project-based management as an organizational innovation: Drivers, changes and benefits of adopting project-based management. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 87–97.
26.
McShaneS. L. (2004). Canadian organizational behaviour (5th ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Office of the Auditor General. (1981). Report of the auditor general of Canada to the House of Commons: Chapter 12 National Research Council of Canada. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved June 11, 2006, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca
29.
Office of the Auditor General. (1994). Report of the auditor general of Canada to the House of Commons: Chapter 9 Science and technology—Overall management of federal science and technology activities. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca
30.
Office of the Auditor General. (2002). Report of the auditor general of Canada to the House of Commons: Chapter 7 Science and technology. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca
31.
Office of the Auditor General. (2004). Report of the auditor general of Canada to the House of Commons: Chapter 1 National Research Council Canada—Management of leading-edge research. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca
32.
Office of the Auditor General. (2005). Report of the auditor general of Canada to the House of Commons: Chapter 1 Natural Resources Canada—Governance and strategic management. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca
33.
PayneJ. H., & TurnerJ. R. (1998). Company-wide project management: the planning and control of programmes of projects of different type. International Journal of Project Management, 17(1), 55–59.
34.
PillaiA. S., JoshiA., & RaoK. S. (2002). Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 165–177.
35.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2003). Organizational project management maturity model (OPM3).Newtown Square, PA: Author.
36.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge—Third edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
37.
RazT. (1993). Introduction of the project management discipline in a software development organization. IBM Systems Journal, 32, 265–277.
ShenharA. J. (2001). Contingent management in temporary, dynamic organizations: The comparative analysis of projects. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 239–271.
41.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (1995). Managing technology projects: A contingent exploratory approach. Presented at the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
42.
Sussex Circle Inc. (2003). A scan of S&T linkages involving Government of Canada institutions. Ottawa: Council of Science and Technology Advisors. Retrieved May 18, 2006, from http://www.csta-cest.ca/index.php?ID=185&Lang=En
