New movements in project management are pushing project teams to hunt down contacts well outside their regular networks, to tackle problems encountered throughout project rollout. This raises the issue of initiating cooperation with someone unknown—that is, harnessing weak ties to tap into resources well outside the comfort zone. Our investigations into polar expedition projects has led us to develop the notion of a potentially cooperative weak tie converging Granovetter's approach with a synthesis about cooperation differentiating identity-sense and utilitarian mechanisms. We conclude that a weak tie can initiate a cooperation only if it includes one of these two sources of cooperation.
AdlerP. S., & KwonS.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
AkrichM., CallonM., & LatourB. (1988). A quoitient le succès des innovations? [What is the success of innovations?]Gérer et Comprendre, Annates des Mines, 11, 4-17; 12, 14–29.
3.
BerryM. (1996). Savoirs théoriques et gestion [Theoretical knowledges and management]. In BarbierJ.-M. (Ed.), Savoirs théorique et savoirs d'action [Theoretical knowledges and action knowledges] (pp. 43–56). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
4.
BirleyS. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107–117.
5.
BoutyI. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resources exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50–65.
6.
BrookesN. J., MortonS. C., DaintyA. R. J., & BurnsN. D. (2006). Social processes, patterns and practices and project knowledge management: A theoretical framework and an empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 474–482.
7.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition.Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.
8.
BurtR. S. (1995). Le capital social, les trous structuraux et l'entrepreneur [Social capital, structural holes and the entrepreneur]. Revue Française de Sociologie, XXXVI, 599–628.
9.
BurtR. S. (2000). The network entrepreneur. In SwedbergR. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship—The social science view (pp. 281–307). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
DameronS. (2004). Opportunisme ou besoin d'appartenance? La dualité coopérative dans le cas d'équipes projet [Opportunism or need to belong? The cooperative duality in the case of project teams]. Management, 7(3), 137–160.
11.
DavidA. (2005). Etudes de cas et généralisation scientifique en sciences de gestion [Case studies and scientific generalization in management sciences]. Revue Sciences de Gestion, 39, 139–166.
12.
DegenneA., & ForseM. (1994). Introducing social networks.Paris: Armand Colin Editeur (Translation Sage Publications 1999).
13.
ForséM. (1997). Capital social et emploi [Social capital and employment]. L'Année sociologique, 47(1), 143–181.
14.
GarelG. (2003). Le management de projet [Project management]. Paris: La Découverte, Collection Repères.
15.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
16.
GranovetterM. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In MarsdenP. V., & LinN. (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105–130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
GranovetterM. S. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers (2nd revised ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
HuangJ. C., & NewellS. (2003). Knowledge integration process and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 167–176.
19.
HuaultI. (1998, June). Embeddedness et théorie de l'entreprise. Autour des travaux de Mark Granovetter [Embeddedness and firm theory. Around the work of Mark Granovetter]. Annales des Mines, Série: Gérer et Comprendre, 52, 73–86.
20.
HuaultI. (Ed.). (2002). La construction sociale de l'entreprise. Autour des travaux de Mark Granovetter [The social construction of the firm. Around the work of Mark Granovetter]. Caen, France: Editions EMS—Management et Société.
21.
HubertA. (2003). Eléments de logistique en matière d'expédition polaire à ski [Elements of logistics for polar ski expedition]. In LièvreP. (Ed.), La logistique des expéditions polaires à ski [Logistics of polar ski expeditions] (pp. 46–51). Paris: GNGL.
22.
JulianJ. (2008). How project management office leaders facilitate cross-project learning and continuous improvement. Project Management Journal, 39(3), 43–58.
23.
KreinerK., & SchultzM. (1993). Informal collaboration in R&D: The formation of networks across organization. Organization Studies, 14(2), 189–209.
24.
LièvreP. (2004). La logistique en milieux extrêmes, le cas des expéditions polaires [Logistics in extreme environments, the case of polar expeditions]. In LièvreP., & TchernevN. (Eds.), La logistique entre management et optimisation [Logistics between management and optimization] (pp. 149–156). Londres, France: Edition Hermès Lavoisier.
25.
MeadS. (2001). Using social network analysis to visualize project teams. Project Management Journal, 32(4), 32–38.
26.
MidlerC. (1998). L'auto qui n'existait pas. Management des projets et transformation de l'entreprise [The car that did not exist. Project management and transformation of the firm]. Paris: Dunod, coll. Stratègies et management.
27.
NahapietJ., & GhoshalS. (1998, April). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.
ShawE. (1999). Networks and their relevance to the entrepreneurial/marketing interface: A review of the evidence. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 24–40.
30.
SteinerP. (1999). La sociologie économique [Economic sociology]. Paris: La Découverte.
31.
SwedbergR. (Ed.). (2000). Entrepreneurship. The social science view.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
WacheuxF. (1996). Méthodes qualitatives et recherche en gestion [Qualitative methods and management research design]. Paris: Economica.
