Attitude-Based Strategic Negotiation for Conflict Management in Construction Projects

Abstract

An innovative negotiation methodology for managing conflicts in construction projects is presented in this article where multiple decision makers are involved. The proposed negotiation methodology has a unique ability to consider the attitudes of the decision makers, which is an important psychological factor in the negotiations that take place in various stages of a construction project. The methodology is developed at the strategic level of decision making in which the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) is employed in assisting decision makers, such as project managers, to achieve the best strategic decision, given the competing interests and attitudes of the decision makers. A real-life case study is used to illustrate how the proposed methodology can be conveniently applied in practice and to demonstrate the importance and the benefits of incorporating the attitudes of multiple decision makers into the negotiation process in order to better identify the most feasible resolutions. The proposed negotiation methodology has been implemented in a negotiation decision support system that assists project managers in tackling real-world controversies, particularly in complex disputes that occur in construction projects.

Keywords

construction projects attitudes negotiation strategic decision conflict management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

De Sousa

(2001). Contaminated sites: The Canadian situation in an international context. Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 131–154.

Dudziak

, & Hendrickson

(1988). Simulation game for contract negotiations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(2), 113–121.

Fang

, Hipel

K. W.

, & Kilgour

D. M.

(1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution. New York: Wiley.

Fraser

N. M.

, & Hipel

K. W.

(1984). Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions. New York: North Holland.

Harmon

K. M. J.

(2003). Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies. Leadership Management Engineering, 3(4), 187–201.

Hipel

K. W.

(Ed.). (2009a). Conflict resolution (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: EOLSS.

Hipel

K.W.

(Ed.). (2009b). Conflict resolution (Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: EOLSS.

Hipel

K. W.

, Hegazy

, & Yousefi

(in press). Combined strategic and tactical negotiation methodology for resolving complex brownfield conflicts. Brazilian Journal of Operational Research.

Inohara

, Hipel

K. W.

, & Walker

(2007). Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the War of 1812. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 16(2), 1–21.

10.

Kassab

, Hipel

K. W.

, & Hegazy

(2006). Conflict resolution in construction disputes using the graph model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132, 1043–1052.

11.

Smith

M. L.

(1992). Planning your negotiation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 8, 254–260.

12.

Yousefi

(2009). Attitude-based strategic and tactical negotiations for conflict resolution in construction. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Systems Design Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

13.

Yousefi

, Hipel

K. W.

, & Hegazy

(2010). An attitude-based negotiation methodology for the management of construction disputes. American Society for Civil Engineering (ASCE) Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(3), 1–10.

14.

Yousefi

, Hipel

K.W.

, Hegazy

, Witmer

J. A.

, & Gray

(2007). Negotiation characteristics in brownfield redevelopment projects. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 1866–1871). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.