Streamlining new product development forces companies to make decisions on preliminary information. This article considers this challenge within the context of project management in the aerospace sector and, in particular, for the development of product-service systems. The concept of knowledge maturity is explored as a means to provide practical decision support, which increases decision makers’ awareness of the knowledge base and supports cross-boundary discussions on the perceived maturity of available knowledge, thereby identifying and mitigating limitations. Requirements are elicited from previous research on knowledge maturity in the aerospace industry, and a knowledge maturity model is developed through five industry-based workshops.
BowerD. C., & WalkerD. H. (2007). Planning knowledge for phased rollout projects. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 45–60.
7.
BracewellR. H., AhmedS., & WallaceK. M. (2004, September/October). DRed and design folders: A way of capturing, storing and passing on knowledge generated during design projects. Paper presented at the DETC '04 ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
8.
BucciarelliL. L. (1994). Designing engineers.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BuxtonD., FarrR., & MacCarthyB. (2006, September). The aero-engine value chain under future business environments: Using agent-based simulation to understand dynamic behaviour. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Modern Information Technology in the Innovation Processes of the Industrial Enterprises, MITIP Budapest, Hungary.
10.
ChiaramonteF. P., & JoshiJ. A. (2004). Workshop on critical issues in microgravity fluids, transport, and reaction processes in advanced human support technology.Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
11.
ChristiansenJ., & VarnesC. (2006, June). The ignorance of information at gate meetings. Paper presented at the 13th International Product Development Management Conference, Milan, Italy.
12.
ChristiansenJ., & VarnesC. (2008). From models to practice: Decision making at portfolio meetings. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25(1), 87–101.
13.
Cooke-DaviesT. (2004). Project management maturity models. In MorrisP. W. G., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1234–1264). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
14.
CooperR. G. (2001). Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
15.
CooperR. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage-gate® idea-to-launch process-update, what's new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 213–232.
16.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE. J. (1997a). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders—I. Research Technology Management, 40(5), 16–28.
17.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE. J. (1997b). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders—II. Research Technology Management, 40(6), 43–52.
18.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE. J. (1999). New product portfolio management: Practices and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16, 333–351.
19.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE.J. (2000). New problems, new solution: Making portfolio management more effective. Research Technology Management, 43(2), 18–33.
20.
CrossN. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3, 221–227.
21.
DarlingtonM. J., CulleyS. J., ZhaoY., AustinS. A., & TangL. C. M. (2009). Defining a framework for the evaluation of information. International Journal of Information Quality, 2(2), 115–132.
22.
EisenhardtK. M. (1990). Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review, 32(3), 39–54.
23.
EisenhardtK. M., & ZbarackiM. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17–37.
24.
EricsonÅ., BergströmM., JohanssonC., & LarssonT. (2007, March).On the way to knowledge awareness in early design. Paper presented at the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Berlin, Germany.
25.
FlanaganT., EckertC., & ClarksonP. J. (2007). Externalizing tacit overview knowledge: A model-based approach to supporting design teams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Deign, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21, 227–242.
26.
GrebiciK., GohY. M., ZhaoS., BlancoE., & McMahonC. (2007, January). Information maturity approach for the handling of uncertainty within a collaborative design team. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Melbourne, Australia.
27.
HicksB., LarssonA., CulleyS., & LarssonT. (2009, August). A methodology for evaluating technology readiness during product development. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stanford, CA, USA.
28.
JanisI. (1972). Victims of groupthink.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
JohanssonC. (2009). Exploring the need of a knowledge maturity approach to support decision making in gated product development. International Journal of Project Management. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30.
JohanssonC., LarssonA., LarssonT., & IsakssonO. (2008, April). Gated maturity assessment: Supporting gate review decisions with knowledge maturity assessment. Paper presented at the CIRP Design Conference 2008, Enschade, Netherlands.
31.
JohanssonC., ParidaV., & LarssonA. (2009, August). How are knowledge and information evaluated?—Decision making in stage-gate processes. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stanford, CA, USA.
32.
JugdevK., & ThomasJ. (2002). Project management maturity models: The silver bullets of competitive advantage. Project Management Journal, 33(4), 4–14.
33.
KelleyT. (2001). The art of innovation.New York: Currency/Doubleday.
34.
KensingF., & MadsenK. H. (1991). Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. In GreenbaumJ., & KyngM. (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 155–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
KerznerH. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
36.
LewisG. A., MahathamT., & WrageL. (2004). Assumptions management in software development.Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon University.
MankinsJ. C. (1998). Research & development degree of difficulty (R&D3).Washington, DC: NASA Advanced Projects Office.
39.
MankinsJ. C. (2002). Approaches to strategic research and technology (R&T) analysis and road mapping. Acta Astronautica, 57(1–9), 3–21.
40.
MarchJ. G. (1999). The pursuit of organizational intelligence.Malden, MA: Blackwell Business.
41.
McAlpineH., HicksB. J., HuetG., & CulleyS. (2006). An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook. Design Studies, 27, 481–504.
42.
MintzbergH., RaisinghaniD., & ThéorêtA. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” design process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246–275.
43.
MintzbergH., & WestleyF. (2001). Decision making: It's not what you think. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 89–93.
44.
ModicaS., & RustichiniA. (1994). Awareness and partitional information structures. Theory and Decision, 37(1), 107–124.
45.
MontO. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product-service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 237–245.
46.
NergârdH., EricsonA., BergströmM., SandbergS., LarssonT., & TörlindP. (2006, May). Functional product development: Discussing knowledge enabling technologies. Paper presented at the Design 2006: 9th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
47.
PaulkM. C., CurtisB., ChrissisM. B., & WeberC.V. (1993). Capability maturity model SM for software, Version 1.1.Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
48.
PolanyiM. (1967). The study of man.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Project Management Intitute. (2008). The standard for portfolio management (2nd ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
50.
RittelH. W. J., & WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
51.
RosenzweigP. (2007). Misunderstanding the nature of company performance: The halo effect and other business delusions. California Management Review, 49(4), 6–20.
52.
SchmidtK., & WagnerI. (2002, June). Coordinative artifacts in architectural practice. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP 2002)/Cooperative Systems Design: A Challenge of the Mobility Age, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
53.
SchrageM. (2000). Serious play: How the world's best companies simulate to innovate.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
54.
ScottJ. (2000). Rational choice theory. In BrowningG., HalcliA., & WebsterF. (Eds.), Understanding contemporary society: Theories of the present (pp. 126–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
SimonH.A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69, 493–513.
StarS. L., & GriesemerJ. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
58.
ThomkeS. (1998). Simulation, learning and R&D development: Evidence from automotive development. Research Policy, 27(1), 55–74.
59.
ThomkeS. (2001). Enlightened experimentation: The new imperative for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 66–75.
60.
ThomkeS. (2003). Experimentation matters.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
61.
TukkerA., & TischnerU. (2004). New business for old Europe.Cologne, Germany: Greenleaf.
62.
UllmanD. G. (2003). The mechanical design process.New York: McGraw-Hill.
63.
UlrichK. T., & EppingerS. D. (2008). Product design and development (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
64.
Value Improvement through a Virtual Aeronautical Collaborative Enterprise (VIVACE). (2007). Retrieved from http://www.vivaceproject.com
65.
WilliamsA. (2006). Product-service systems in the automotive industry: The case of micro-factory retailing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 172–184.
66.
WilliamsA. (2007). Product service systems in the automobile industry: Contribution to system innovation?Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1093–1103.
67.
ZhaoY. Y., TangL. C. M., DarlingtonM., AustinS. A., & CulleyS. (2008). High value information in engineering organisations. International Journal of Information Management, 28, 246–258.
