In recent years, systems engineering and Project Management Bodies of Knowledge have been rapidly growing. However, despite the vast amount of literature available on systems engineering and project management, about two-thirds of all projects still fail. A review of both project management and systems engineering publications reveals that most of these works focus on processes. We suggest focusing on people—project managers and systems engineers. One of our previous studies dealt with project managers; this article focuses on systems engineers. This article presents findings of a study aimed at exploring the relationship among systems engineers’ capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST), project types, and project success. The instrument used in this study was a self-report questionnaire, composed of three parts. The first part assessed the participants’ CEST, the second part assessed several measures of project success, and the third part assessed four dimensions of project type. The simple random sampling method was used, and the sample included 114 senior systems engineers who were randomly selected from the sampling frame. The study findings show that there is a statistically significant correlation between CEST and project success. The extent of the project's novelty, complexity, and technological uncertainty are moderator variables that affect this correlation.
AnastasiA. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2.
ArnoldE. P. (2006). Defining, finding, and hiring real systems engineers. Proceedings of 16th Annual Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (Orlando, FL). Seattle, WA: INCOSE. Retrieved from https://www.incose.org/ipub/06/031_1041.pdf (access to INCOSE members only)
3.
BakerN., MurphyD., & FisherD. (1988). Factors affecting project success. In ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of project management (pp. 902–919). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
4.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
ChuaD. K., KogY. C., & LohP. K. (1999). Critical success factors for different project objectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), 142–150.
7.
CooperR. G., & KleinschmidtE. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169–184.
8.
DavidzH. L., & NightingaleD. J. (2008). Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Systems Engineering, 11(1), 1–14.
9.
DerroM. E., & WilliamsC. R. (2009). Behavioral competencies of highly regarded systems engineers at NASA. Proceedings of Aerospace Conference (pp. 1–17). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Publications Office. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2009.4839712
10.
DrazinR., & Van de VenA. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514–539.
11.
DvirD., RazT., & ShenharA. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89–95.
12.
DvirD., SadehA., & Malach-PinesA. (2006). Projects and projects managers: The relationship between project managers’ personality, projects types, and project success. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 36–48.
13.
Edum-FotweE. T., & McCafferR. (2000). Developing project management competency. International Journal of Project Management, 18, 111–124.
14.
FramptonK., ThomJ. A., & CarrollJ. (2006). Enhancing IT architect capabilities: Experiences within a university subject. Paper presented at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS2006), Adelaide, South Australia.
15.
FrankM. (2006). Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST). Systems Engineering, 9(2), 91–103.
16.
FrankM. (2010). Assessing the interest for systems engineering positions and other engineering positions’ required capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST). Systems Engineering, 13(2), 161–174.
17.
FrankM., & ElataD. (2005). Developing the capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST) of freshman engineering students. Systems Engineering, 8(2), 187–195.
18.
FrankM., & KordovaS. (2009). Developing the capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST) of senior engineering management students: Learning in a project-based learning (PBL) environment. In KalawskyR.S., O'BrienJ., GoonetillekeT., & GrocottC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER 2009), Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.Loughborough University, Research School of Systems Engineering.
19.
FrazierP. A., TixA. P., & BarronK. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology51, 115–134.
O'ConnorJ., & McDermottI. (1997). The art of systems thinking.San Francisco, CA: Thorsons.
33.
PenningsJ. M. (1992). Structural contingency theory: A reappraisal. In StawB., & CummingsI. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 267–309). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
PintoJ. K., & MantelS. J. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4), 269–276.
35.
PintoJ. K., & SlevinD. P. (1988). Project success: Definitions and measurement techniques. Project Management Journal, 19(3), 67–73.
36.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide; 4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
RichmondB. (2000). The “thinking” in systems thinking.Waltham, MA: Pegasus.
39.
SadehA., DvirD., & ShenharA. (2000). The role of contract type in the success of R&D defense projects under increasing uncertainty. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 14–22.
40.
SengeP. M. (1994). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
41.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42.
StandingC., GuilfoyleA., ChadL., & LoveP. E. (2006). The attribution of success and failure in IT projects. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(8), 1148–1165.
