This article investigates the benefits and supports provided by project management methodologies (PMMs) to project managers for the management and delivery of information technology/information system (IT/IS) projects. Using a qualitative approach, through case study strategy, the role of PMMs is examined in different business and project contexts. This article evaluates the benefit of PMMs based on their traits and characteristics and investigates PMMs in their operational context: where PMMs come from and how they support practitioners. The findings suggest a misalignment between the intended benefit of PMMs at the strategic level and the reported benefits by project managers at the project level. Additionally, it is shown that practitioners’ expertise, accountability, and attitudes all have a direct influence on the extent to which PMMs contribute to and benefit the management of projects.
Al-ZoabiZ. (2008). Introducing discipline to XP: Applying PRINCE2 on XP projects.Presented at the Third International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, The Arab International University, Damascus, Syria.
BoehmB., & TurnerR. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline a guide for the perplexed.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
CharvatJ. (2003). Project management methodologies: Selecting, implementing and supporting methodologies and processes for projects.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5.
Committee on Corporate Governance. (2000). The combined code: Principles of good governance and code of best practice. Derived from the Committee's Final Report and the Cadbury and Greenbury Reports, United Kingdom.
6.
CooperR. G. (2007). Managing technology development projects. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 35(1), 67–76.
DaviesA., & HobdayM. (2005). The business of projects: Managing innovation in complex products and systems.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
GardinerP. (2005). Project management: A strategic planning approach. Palgrave.
10.
GunnarsonS., LindeA., & LoidD. (2000). Is standardisation applicable to project managers of multi-project companies? In paradoxes of project collaboration in the global economy: Interdependences, complexity and ambiguity.Proceedings of the IRNOP IV Conference, pp. 136–146.
11.
HerzbergF. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees?Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62.
12.
Improving Government Risk Handling. (2009, March 29). Personal minute from the Prime Minister to Deputy Prime Minister.
13.
JayaratnaN. (1994). Understanding and evaluating methodologies.London, England: McGraw-Hill.
14.
King Committee on Corporate Governance. (2002). King report 2002.Johannesburg, South Africa: Institute of Directors, South Africa.
15.
McManusJ., & Wood-HarperT. (2008, February). The IT trade off. Project, 20(4).
16.
MorrisP. W., & PintoJ. K. (2004). The Wiley guide to managing projects.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. TSO London.
19.
SauerC., & ReichB. H. (2009). Rethinking IT project management: Evidence of a new mindset and its implications. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 182–193.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
SmythH. J., & MorrisP. W. G. (2007). An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: Methodological issues. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 423–436.
ThamhainH. J. (1994). A manager's guide to effective concurrent project management. PM Network, 8(11), 6–10.
25.
ThomasR. (2006). A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
26.
WellsH., & SmythH. (2011). A service-dominant logic: What service? An evaluation of project management methodologies and project management attitudes in IT/IS project business.Tallinn, Estonia: EURAM.
27.
WhiteD., & FortuneJ. (2002). Current practice in project management: An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 1–11.
28.
WilliamsT. M. (2003). Corporate governance: A guide for fund managers and corporations.Sydney, Australia: Investment & Financial Services Association Limited, Westpac Banking Corporation.
29.
WysockiR. K. (2007). Effective software project management.Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
30.
YardleyD. (2002). Successful IT project delivery: Learning the lessons of project failure.London, England: Addison Wesley.
31.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
