This study investigates the variety of ethical decisions of project managers and their impact from corporate governance and project governance structures. The roles of personal trust and system trust as a mechanism to steer ethical decision making in different governance settings is explored. Nine qualitative case studies in Europe, Asia, and Australia show that ethical decision making is contingent on trust, which in turn is contingent on the fulfillment of personal expectations within a given governance structure. The findings show the prerequisites for ethical decision making and the consequences of lack of trust. Further managerial and theoretical implications are discussed.
Association for Project Management. (2004). Directing change: A guide to governance of project management.High Wycombe, UK: Author.
4.
BrienA. (1998). Professional ethics and the culture of trust. Journal of Business Communication, 17(4), 391–409.
5.
BrownS., & EisenhardtK. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.
6.
CarsonS. J., MadhokA., VarmanR., & JohnG. (2003). Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration. Organization Science, 14(1), 45–56.
7.
CiullaJ. B. (2009). Leadership and the ethics of care. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 3–4.
8.
ClarkeT. (2004). The stakeholder corporation: A business philosophy for the information age (pp. 189–202). London, UK: Routledge.
9.
ClasesC., BachmannR., & WehnerT. (2003). Studying trust in virtual organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 33(3), 7–27.
10.
CleggS. R., KornbergerM., & RhodesC. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8551.2006.00493.x
11.
CleggS. R., PitsisT. S., Rura-PolleyT., & MarosszekyM. (2002). Governmentality matters: Designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects. Organization Studies, 23(3), 317–337.
12.
DasT. K., & TengB.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.
13.
DirksK. T., & FerrinD. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450–467.
14.
DonaldsonL. (2008). Ethics problems and problems with ethics: Toward a pro-management theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 299–311.
15.
DyerJ. H., & ChuW. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68.
16.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archeology of knowledge.London, UK: Tavistock.
17.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.
18.
GodboldA. (2007). Managing ethics. In TurnerJ. R., & SimisterS. J. (Eds.), Gower handbook of project management (4th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 838–854). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
19.
GodboldA. (2008). Ethics and projects.Proceedings of the IPMA Expert Seminar, February 14–15, 2008, Zurich, Switzerland.
20.
GodboldA., & TurnerJ. R. (1996). Ethical project management. In TurnerJ. R., GrudeK. V., & ThurlowayL. (Eds.), The project manager as change agent (pp. 170–190). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill UK.
21.
GreyC., & GarstenC. (2001). Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 22(2), 229–250.
22.
GulatiR., & NickersonJ. A. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688–708.
23.
HartmanF. T. (2002). The role of trust in project management. In SlevinD. P., ClelandD. L., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), Proceedings from the PMI Research Conference 2002, “Frontiers of project management research and application,” July 14–17, 2002, Seattle, WA (pp. 225–235). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
24.
HelgadottirH. (2008). The ethical dimension of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 743–748.
25.
HosmerL. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.
26.
HuangC.-L., & ChangB.-G. (2009). The effects of managers' moral philosophy on project decision under agency problem conditions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 595–611.
27.
HustedB. W. (1998). The ethical limits of trust in business relations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(2), 233–248.
28.
JensenM. C., & MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
29.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.
30.
JonesG. R., & GeorgeJ. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.
31.
KadeforsA. (2004). Trust in project relationships: Inside the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 175–182.
32.
Kish-GephartJ. J., HarrisonD. A., & TrevinoL. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
33.
KimW. C., & MauborgneR. (2003). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65–75.
34.
KlakeggO. J., WilliamsT., MagnussenO. M., & GlasspoolH. (2008). Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation. Project Management Journal, 30(Supplement), S27–S42.
35.
LangfredC. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399.
36.
LooR. (2002). Tackling ethical dilemmas in project management using vignettes. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 489–495.
37.
LorinoP., TricardB., & ClotY. (2011). Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry. Organization Studies (Vol. 32, pp. 769–801).
38.
LuhmannN. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In GambettaD. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (electronic edition, pp. 94–107). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. Retrieved from www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/luhmann94–107.pdf
39.
MayerR. C., DavisJ. H., & SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
40.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect- and cognitive-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal38(1), 24–59.
41.
McEvilyB., PerroneV., & ZaheerA. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.
42.
McKnightD. H., CummingsL. L., & ChervanyN. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473.
43.
MicewskiE., & TroyC. (2007). Business ethics: Deontologically revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 17–25.
44.
MillerR., & HobbsB. (2005). Governance regimes for large projects. Project Management Journal, 36(3), 42–51.
MüllerR. (2011). Project governance. In MorrisP., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 297–320). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
NooteboomB. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17(6), 985–1010.
48.
OuchiW. G., & MaguireM. A. (1975). Organizational control: Two functions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), 559–569.
49.
ParkC., & KeilM. (2009). Organizational silence and whistle-blowing on IT projects: An integrated model. Decision Sciences, 40(4), 901–918.
50.
PintoJ. K., SlevinD. P., & EnglishB. (2009). Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 638–648.
51.
PrykeS.D. (2005). Towards a social network theory of project governance. Construction Management and Economics, 23, 927–939.
52.
PuranamP., & VannesteB. S. (2009). Trust and governance: Untangling a tangled web. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 11–31.
53.
SchoormanF. D., MayerR. C., & DavisJ. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.
54.
ShalviS., HandgraafM. J. J., & De DreuK. W. (2011). Ethical manoeuvring: Why people avoid both major and minor lies. British Journal of Management, 22, 16–27.
SmithH. J., & KeilM. (2003). The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model. Information Systems Journal, 13(1), 69–95.
57.
SmithH. J., ThompsonR., & IacovouC. (2009). The impact of ethical climate on project status misreporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 577–591.
58.
StokerG. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.
59.
SydowJ. (2000). Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In LaneC., & BachmannR. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical implications (pp. 31–64). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
TrevinoL. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.
61.
TrevinoL.K. (1990). A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational ethics. In WoodmanR., & PassmoreW. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and Development (Vol. 4, pp. 195–230). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62.
TsengF. C., & FanY. J. (2011). Exploring the influence of organizational ethical climate on knowledge management. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 325–342.
63.
TurnerJ. R. (2009). The handbook of project-based management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
64.
TurnerJ. R., & KeeganA. E. (1999). The versatile project-based organization: Governance and operational control. European Management Journal, 17(3), 296–309.
65.
TurnerJ. R., & KeeganA. E. (2001). Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: The role of the broker and steward. European Management Journal, 19(3), 254–267.
66.
TurnerJ. R., & MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–7.
67.
TurnerJ. R., & MüllerR. (2004). Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent. European Management Journal, 22(3), 327–336.
68.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social science research.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
69.
Van YperenN. W., HamstraM. R. W., & Van der KlauwM. (2011). To win, or not to lose, at any cost: The impact of achievement goals on cheating. British Journal of Management, 22, 5–15.
70.
VictorB., & CullenJ. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–124.
71.
VohsK., & SchoolerJ. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49–54.
72.
WalkerD. H. T., SegonM., & RowlinsonS. (2008). Business ethics and corporate citizenship. In WalkerD. H. T., & RowlinsonS. (Eds.), Procurement systems: A cross industry project management perspective.Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis, 101–139.
73.
WangE. T. G., & ChenJ. H. F. (2006). The influence of governance equilibrium on ERP project success. Decision Support Systems, 41(4), 708–727.
74.
WekselbergV. (1996). Reduced “social” in a new model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 333–335.
75.
WicksA. C., BermanS. L., & JonesT. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 99–116.
76.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
