We examine what kinds of patterns of mechanisms can be applied in the coordination of several inter-related project teams. We identify three distinct coordination schemes; namely: centralized coordination, decentralized coordination, and balanced coordination. In addition, we compare individuals' perceptions on communication, coordination effectiveness, project efficiency, learning, task analyzability, and task uncertainty between the three identified coordination schemes. The results of our study extend to both theoretical and practical understanding of coordination in multi-team projects and its relation to communication, coordination effectiveness, project performance, and learning.
AdlerP. (1995). Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface.Organizational Science, 6(2), 147–167.
2.
AnconaD. G., & CaldwellD.F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams.Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–661.
3.
AndresH., & ZmudR. (2002). A contingency approach to software project coordination.Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3) 41–70.
4.
BrownS. L., & EisenhardtK.M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions.Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.
5.
CooperR. G., & KleinschmidtE.J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.
6.
DaftR., & LengelR. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design.Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
7.
DvirD., RazT., & ShenharA. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success.International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89–95.
8.
EttlieJ. (1995). Product-process development integration in manufacturing.Management Science, 41(7), 1224–1237.
HartS., & BanburyC. (1994). How strategy-making processes can make a difference.Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 251–269.
11.
HoeglM., & WeinkaufK. (2005). Managing task interdependencies in multi-team project: A longitudinal study.Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1287–1308.
12.
HoeglM., WeinkaufK., & GemündenH. (2004). Inter-team coordination, project commitment, and teamwork: A longitudinal study.Organization Science, 15, 38–55.
13.
KazanjianR. K., DrazinR., & GlynnM.A. (2000). Creativity and technological learning: The roles of organization architecture and crisis in large projects.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 273–298.
14.
KirschL. (1997). Portfolios of control modes and IS project management.Information Systems Research, 8(3), 215–239.
15.
KerznerH. (1998). In search of excellence in project management: Successful practices in high performance organizations.New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
KratzerJ., GemündenH. G., & LettlC. (2008a). Balancing creativity and time efficiency in multi-team R&D projects: The alignment of formal and informal networks.R&D Management, 38, 538–549.
17.
KratzerJ., GemündenH. G., & LettlC. (2008b). Revealing the dynamics and their consequences of formal and informal networks in multi-institutional product development collaborations.Research Policy, 37, 1356–1370.
18.
KratzerJ., GemündenH. G., & LettlC. (2011). The organizational design of large R&D collaborations and its effect on time and budget efficiency: The contrast between blueprints and reality.IEEE TEM, 58, 295–306.
19.
KrautR., & StreeterL. (1995). Coordination in software development.Communication of the ACM, 38(3), 69–81.
20.
LakemondN., BerggrenC., & van WeeleA. (2006). Coordinating supplier involvement in product development projects: A differentiated coordination typology.R&D Management, 36(1), 55–66.
21.
LeavittH.J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 46(1), 38–50.
22.
MarksM. A., De ChurchL. A., MathieuJ. E., PanzerF. J., & AlonsoA. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 964–971.
23.
MarkusM. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice.Organization Science, 5(4), 502–527.
24.
MenonA., JaworskiB., & KohliA. (1997). Product quality: Impact of interdepartmental interactions.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 187–200.
25.
MilesM., & HubermanA. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
MoenartR., & SouderW. (1990). An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(2), 91–107.
27.
NidumoluS. (1996). A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software development projects.Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 77–113.
28.
NihtiläJ. (1999). R&D–Production integration in the early phases of new product development projects.Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 16, 55–81.
29.
O'SullivanA. (2003). Dispersed collaboration in a multi-firm, multi-team product-development project.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 93–116.
30.
PintoM., PintoJ., & PrescottJ. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional success.Management Science, 39, 1281–1298.
31.
RiceR. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness.Organization Science, 3(4), 475–500.
32.
ShenharA., DvirD., LevyO., & MaltzA. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept.Long Range Planning, 34, 699–725.
33.
ShenharA., TisherA., DvirD., LipovetskyS., & LechlerT. (2002). Refining the search for project success factors: A multivariate, typological approach.R&D Management, 32(2), 111–126.
34.
ShenharA.J. (2001a). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains.Management Science, 47(3), 394–414.
35.
SicotteH., & LangleyA. (2000). Integration mechanisms and R&D project performance.Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 17, 1–37.
36.
SouderW., & MoenartR. (1992). Integrating marketing and R&D project personnel within innovation projects: An information uncertainty model.Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 485–512.
37.
SydowJ., LindkvistL., & DeFilippiR. (2004). Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge.Organization Studies, 25, 1475–1488.
38.
TaxénL. (2003). A framework for the coordination of complex systems' development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
39.
TerwieschC., LochC. H., & De MeyerA. (2002). Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies.Organization Science, 13(4), 402–419.
40.
ThompsonJ. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
41.
Van de VenA., DelbecqA., & KoenigR. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations.American Sociological Review, 41(2), 322–338.
42.
Von HippelE. (1990). Task partitioning: An innovation process variable.Research Policy, 19(5), 407–418.
43.
WurstK., HoeglM., & GemüendenH. (2001). Collaboration within and bet ween teams in multi-team R&D projects.Management of Engineering and Technology. doi: 10.1109/PICMET. 2001. 952319. Conference proceeding, 545–552.
