The Infection Rate of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement is Higher When Compared to Other Bearing Surfaces as Documented by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Abstract

Background

Despite the well-documented decline in the use of metal-on-metal (MoM) implants over the last decade, there are still controversies regarding whether all MoM implants are created equally. Complications such as elevated serum metal ion levels, aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) and pseudotumours have all been well documented, but recent studies suggest increased risk of infection with MoM bearing surfaces. Most of these studies however have small patient numbers.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study was to examine the cumulative incidence of revision for infection of MoM bearing surfaces in primary hip arthroplasty at a national and single-surgeon level.

Methods

Data was collected from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, which contains over 98% of all arthroplasties performed in Australia since 2001. The cumulative incidence of revision for infection was extracted at a national level and single-surgeon level.

Results

Two hundred seventy-six thousand eight hundred seventy-eight subjects were documented in the Australian registry. The 10-year cumulative percent revision for infection of MoM bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement (THR) was 2.5% at a national level, compared to 0.8% for other bearing surfaces. The senior author contributed 1755 subjects with 7-year follow-up and a cumulative percent revision for infection of MoM bearing surfaces in primary THR of 36.9%, compared to 2.0% for other bearing surfaces. The cumulative percent of revision of MoM bearing surfaces is higher compared to other bearing surfaces; this is especially pronounced in cumulative percent of revision for infection.

Conclusion

There was a higher cumulative percent of revision for infection in MoM bearings surfaces (in particular, large-head MoM) compared to other bearing surfaces at both the national and individual-surgeon level.

Keywords

metal on metal infection risk Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry increased risk of revision surgery large-head metal on metal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Orthopaedic Association. Hip, Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2016.

Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(9):2357–2362.

Daines

Dennis

Amann

Infection prevention in total knee arthroplasty

JAAOS.201523356–364

de Steiger

Miller

Davidson

Ryan

Graves

Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses

Acta Orthop2013844348–35210.3109/17453674.2013.8313203768032

Donaldson J MJ, Sri-Ram K et al. The relationship between the presence of metallosis and massive infection in metal on metal hip replacements. Hip Int. 2010;20(2):242–247.

Judd

Noiseux

Concomitant infection and local metal reaction in patients undergoing revision of metal on metal total hip arthroplasty

Iowa Orthop J20113159–633215115

Langton

Jameson

Joyce

Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement

J Bone Joint Surg Br201193-B81011–1016

10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.26040

Lombardi AV Jr., Mallory TH, Cuckler JM, Williams J, Berend KR, Smith TM. Mid-term results of a polyethylene-free metal-on-metal articulation. J Arthroplast.19(7):42–47.

Registry AOANJR. Metal on Metal Bearing Surface in Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Supplementary Report. Adelaide; 2015.

10.

Silverman

Ashely

Sheth

Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: is there still a role in 2016?

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med2016993–9610.1007/s12178-016-9323-14762806

11.

Watters T, Eward WC, Hallows RK, Dodd LG, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP. Pseudotumour with superimposed periprosthetic infection following metal on metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1666–1669.

12.

Wyles C, Van Demark RE 3rd, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal on metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:509–516.