Biomechanical Comparison of Double Grasping Repair versus Cross-Locked Cruciate Flexor Tendon Repair

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to compare the in vitro biomechanical properties of tensile strength and gap resistance of a double grasping loop (DGL) flexor tendon repair with the established four-strand cross-locked cruciate (CLC) flexor tendon repair, both with an interlocking horizontal mattress (IHM) epitendinous suture. The hypothesis is that the DGL-IHM method which utilizes two looped core sutures, grasping and locking loops, and a single intralesional knot will have greater strength and increased gap resistance than the CLC-IHM method.

Methods

Forty porcine tendons were evenly assigned to either the DGL-IHM or CLC-IHM group. The tendon repair strength, 2-mm gap force and load to failure, was measured under a constant rate of distraction. The stiffness of tendon repair was calculated and the method of repair failure was analyzed.

Results

The CLC-IHM group exhibited a statistically significant greater resistance to gapping, a statistically significant higher load to 2-mm gapping (62.0 N), and load to failure (99.7 N) than the DGL-IHM group (37.1 N and 75.1 N, respectively). Ninety percent of CLC-IHM failures were a result of knot failure whereas 30 % of the DGL-IHM group exhibited knot failure.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the CLC-IHM flexor tendon repair method better resists gapping and has a greater tensile strength compared to the experimental DGL-IHM method. The authors believe that while the DGL-IHM provides double the number of sutures at the repair site per needle pass, this configuration does not adequately secure the loop suture to the tendon, resulting in a high percentage of suture pullout and inability to tolerate loads as high as those of the CLC-IHM group.

Keywords

Biomechanical study Flexor tendon repair

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amadio

. Friction of the gliding surface. Implications for tendon surgery and rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:112–9.

Angeles

Heminger

Mass

. Comparative biomechanical performances of 4-strand core suture repairs for zone II flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:508–17.

Aoki

Kubota

Pruitt

. Biomechanical and histologic characteristics of canine flexor tendon repair using early postoperative mobilization. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1997;22:107–14.

Barrie

Tomak

Cholewicki

. The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:714–20.

Barrie

Wolfe

Shean

. A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:499–506.

Barrie

Tomak

Cholewicki

. Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:340–6.

Brockardt

Sullivan

Watkins

. Evaluation of simple and looped suture and new material for flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34:329–32.

Bunnell

. Repair of tendons in the fingers and description of two new instruments. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1918;26:103–10.

Cao

Tang

. Biomechanical evaluation of a four-strand modification of the Tang method of tendon repair. J Hand Surg (Br). 2005;30:374–8.

10.

Cao

Zhu

Xie

. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31:107–12.

11.

Croog

Goldstein

Nasser

. Comparative biomechanic performances of locked cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repairs in an ex vivo porcine model. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:225–32.

12.

Diao

Hariharan

Soejima

. Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:234–9.

13.

Dona

Turner

Gianoutsos

. Biomechanical properties of four circumferential flexor tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:824–31.

14.

Dona

Gianoutsos

Walsh

. Optimizing biomechanical performance of the 4-strand cruciate flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:571–80.

15.

Elliot

Moiemen

Flemming

. The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg (Br). 1994;19:607–12.

16.

Evans

Thompson

. The application of force to the healing tendon. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:266–84.

17.

Gan

Neo

. A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2012;37:1830–4.

18.

Gelberman

Woo

Lothringer

. Effects of early intermittent passive mobilization on healing canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1982;7:170–5.

19.

Gelberman

Manske

. Factors influencing flexor tendon adhesions. Hand Clin. 1985;1:35–42.

20.

Gelberman

Woo

Amiel

. Influences of flexor sheath continuity and early motion on tendon healing in dogs. J Hand Surg Am. 1990;15:69–77.

21.

Gelberman

Nunley

2nd Osterman

. Influences of the protected passive mobilization interval on flexor tendon healing a prospective randomized clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;264:189–96.

22.

Gelberman

Boyer

Brodt

. The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of *tendon-healing in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:975–82.

23.

Gibbons

Thompson

Sandow

. Flexor tenorrhaphy tensile strength: reduction by cyclic loading: in vitro and ex vivo porcine study. Hand (N Y). 2009;4:113–8.

24.

Gill

Lim

Shatford

. A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:1315–22.

25.

Gordon

Matsui

McDonald

. Analysis of a knotless flexor tendon repair using a multifilament stainless steel cable-crimp system. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:677–83.

26.

Greenwald

Shumway

Allen

. Dynamic analysis of profundus tendon function. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19:626–35.

27.

Herrmann

. Tensile strength and knot security of surgical suture materials. Am Surg. 1971;37:209–17.

28.

Hirpara

Sullivan

O'Sullivan

. The effects of freezing on the tensile properties of repaired porcine flexor tendon. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:353–8.

29.

Hotokezaka

Manske

. Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:995–1003.

30.

Ilahi

Younas

. Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2407–14.

31.

Karjalainen

Chong

. An analysis of the pull-out strength of 6 suture loop configurations in flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:217–23.

32.

Kim

Aoki

Tokita

. Tensile strength of cross-stitch epitenon suture. J Hand Surg (Br). 1996;21:821–3.

33.

Kleinert

Kutz

Atasoy

. Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4:865–76.

34.

Kleinert

Kutz

Cohen

. Primary repair of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations. In AAOS Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, pp. 91–104, 1975.

35.

Komatsu

Mori

Uchio

. Optimum surgical suture material and methods to obtain high tensile strength at knots: problems of conventional knots and the reinforcement effect of adhesive agent. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11:70–4.

36.

Lawrence

Davis

. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:836–41.

37.

Lawrence

Woodruff

Aladin

. An assessment of the tensile properties and technical difficulties of two- and four-strand flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg (Br). 2005;30:294–7.

38.

Chiu

Meineke

. Number of suture throws and its impact on the biomechanical properties of the four-strand cruciate locked flexor tendon repair with FiberWire. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37:826–31.

39.

McLarney

Hoffman

Wolfe

. Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:295–301.

40.

Merrell

Wolfe

Kacena

. The effect of increased peripheral suture purchase on the strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:464–8.

41.

Miller

Dodds

DeMars

. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:591–6.

42.

Mishra

Kuiper

Kelly

. Influence of core suture material and peripheral repair technique on the strength of Kessler flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:357–62.

43.

Momose

Amadio

Zhao

. The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:806–11.

44.

Pruitt

Manske

Fink

. Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1991;16:701–7.

45.

Pruitt

Aoki

Manske

. Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1996;21:969–73.

46.

Sandow

McMahon

. Single-cross grasp six-strand repair for acute flexor tenorrhaphy: modified Savage technique. Atlas Hand Clin. 1996;1:41–64.

47.

Scherman

Haddad

Scougall

. Cross-sectional area and strength differences of fiberwire, prolene, and ticron sutures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2010;35:780–4.

48.

Schuind

Garcia-Elias

Cooney

3rd . Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;17:291–8.

49.

Shaieb

Singer

. Tensile strengths of various suture techniques. J Hand Surg (Br). 1997;22:764–7.

50.

Silfverskiöld

Andersson

. Two new methods of tendon repair: an in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993;18:58–65.

51.

Smith

Forder

Annapureddy

. The porcine forelimb as a model for human flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Surg (Br). 2005;30:307–9.

52.

Strickland

Glogovac

. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5:537–43.

53.

Strickland

. Flexor tendon injuries: I foundations of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:44–54.

54.

Strickland

. Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:214–35.

55.

Tang

Shi

. Double and multiple looped suture tendon repair. J Hand Surg (Br). 1994;19:699–703.

56.

Tang

Wang

Chen

. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;386:252–9.

57.

Tang

Zhang

Cao

. Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:1262–6.

58.

Tidwell

Kish

Samora

. Knot security: how many throws does it really take? Orthopedics. 2012;35:e532–7.

59.

Trail

Powell

Noble

. An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. J Hand Surg (Br). 1989;14:422–7.

60.

Viinikainen

Göransson

Huovinen

. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures. J Hand Surg (Br). 2004;29:536–43.

61.

Viinikainen

Göransson

Huovinen

. The strength of the 6-strand modified Kessler repair performed with triple-stranded or triple-stranded bound suture in a porcine extensor tendon model: an ex vivo study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007;32:510–7.

62.

Viinikainen

Göransson

Ryhänen

. Primary flexor tendon repair techniques. Scand J Surg. 2008;97:333–40.

63.

Wada

Kubota

Hatanaka

. The mechanical properties of locking and grasping suture loop configurations in four-strand core suture techniques. J Hand Surg (Br). 2000;25:548–51.

64.

Wada

Kubota

Miyanishi

. Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg (Br). 2001;26:301–6.

65.

Winters

Gelberman

Woo

. The effects of *multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;23:97–104.

66.

Xie

Tang

. Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:461–5.

67.

Xie

Xue

. Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:455–60.

68.

Zhao

Amadio

Tanaka

. Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2482–8.