Given the lack of attention to Black girls’ participation in STEM related courses, it remains unclear why this group participates at lower rates in STEM courses later in their academic careers (Hyde et al. 2008; Tocci and Engelhard 1991; Catsambis 1994). The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which teachers influence Black girls’ opportunities along the math pipeline. The aim is to determine the role of Black girls’ cognitive and non-cognitive behaviors on teachers’ decisions to place them in advanced courses. Using nationally representative survey data, the findings indicate that Black girls’ confidence in their ability to master skills taught math reduced the odds teacher recommendations to advanced courses. Additionally, teachers’ expectations of the educational attainment of Black girls were related to the recommendation process. Overall, the findings suggest that subjective beliefs held by students and teachers critically influence Black girls’ persistence along the math pipeline.
AttewellP., DominaT.Raising the bar: curricular intensity and academic performance.Educ Eval Policy Anal.2008; 30(1): 51–71.
2.
BuchmannC., DiPreteT.A., McDanielA.Gender inequalities in education.Annu Rev Sociol.2008; 34(1): 319–37.
3.
BurrisC.C., HeubertJ.P., LevinH.M.Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping.Am Educ Res J.2006; 43(1): 137–54.
4.
CatsambisS.The path to math: gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school.Sociol Educ.1994; 67(3): 199–215.
5.
ChoyS.P., HornL.J., NunezA., ChenX.Transition to college: what helps at-risk students and students whose parents did not attend college.New Dir Institut Res.2000; 2000(107): 4.
CottonK.School size, school climate, and student performance.Portland: Northwest Regional Education Laboratory; 1996.
8.
CottonK.New small learning communities findings from recent literature.[Portland OR] [Washington DC]: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement Educational Resources Information Center; 2001.
9.
DarityW., CastellinoD., TysonK., CobbC., McMillenB.Increasing opportunity to learn via access to rigorous courses and programs: One strategy for closing the achievement gap for at-risk and ethnic students.North Carolina Department of Public Instruction; 2001.
10.
DietteT.Equal Resources?Access to Algebra Across Schools; 2012.
11.
FergusonR.F.Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap.Urban Educ.2003; 38(4): 460–507.
12.
FrancisD.Sugar and spice and everything nice?:Teacher perceptions of Black Girls in the Classroom; 2012.
GeiserS., SantelicesV.The role of Advanced Placement and honors courses in college admissions.Center for Studies on Higher Education, Research and Occasional Paper Series, CSHE.4.04; 2004.
15.
GriffinD., FarrisA.D.School counselors and collaboration: finding resources through community asset mapping.Prof Sch Couns.2010; 13(5): 248–56.
16.
HallinanM.L.Tracking: from theory to practice. Exchange.Sociol Educ.1994; 67(2): 79–84.
17.
HanushekE.A.Educational production functions.Palgrave Encyclopedia, 2007.
18.
HowleyC.The academic effectiveness of small-scale schooling.Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 897); 1994.
KlopfensteinK.The link between advanced placement experience and early college success.South Econ J.2009; 75(3): 873.
21.
LimJ.J.H.Double jeopardy: the compounding effects of class and race in school mathematics.Equity Excell Educ.2008; 41(1): 81–97.
22.
MauW., BikosL.H.Educational and vocational aspirations of minority and female students: a longitudinal study.J Couns Dev.2000; 78(2): 186.
23.
McKnightP., McKnightK., SidaniS., FigueredoA.Missing data: A gentle introduction.New York: The Guilford Press;2007.
24.
MickelsonR.A.Subverting Swann: first- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools.Am Educ Res J.2001; 38(2): 215–52.
25.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.2011. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2011. Special Report NSF 11–309. Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
26.
OakesJ.Opportunities, achievement, and choice: women and students in science and mathematics.Rev Res Educ.1990; 16: 153–222.
27.
OakesJ.Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. 2nd ed.New Haven: Yale University Press; 2005.
28.
OgbuJ.U.Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement.Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
29.
RaywidM.A.Current literature on small schools (ERIC Digest).Charleston: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools; 1999.
30.
RiehlC., PallasA.M.Rites and wrongs: institutional explanations for the student course-scheduling process in urban school.Am J Educ.1999; 107(2): 116.
31.
RoseR.A., FraserM.W.A simplified framework for using multiple imputation in social work research.Soc Work Res.2008; 32(3): 171–8.
32.
RubinB.C.Unpacking detracking: when progressive pedagogy meets students’ social worlds.Am Educ Res J.2003; 40(2): 539–73.
33.
SchaferJ.L., GrahamJ.W.Missing data: our view of the state of the art.Psychol Methods.2002; 7(2): 147–77.
34.
SharpeR.V., SwintonO.Beyond antidotes: A quantitative examination of black women in academe; 2012.
35.
TenenbaumH.R., RuckM.D.Are teachers’ expectations different for racial than for European American students? A meta-analysis.J Educ Psychol.2007; 99(2): 253–73.
36.
TocciC.M., EngelhardGJr.. Achievement, parental support, and gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics.J Educ Res.1991; 84(5): 280–6.
37.
TysonK.Integration interrupted: Tracking, Black students, and acting white after Brown.New York: Oxford University Press;2011.
38.
UseemE.L.Getting on the fast track in mathematics: school organizational influences on math track assignment.Am J Educ.1992; 100(3): 325.
39.
U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey.Enrollment status of the population 3 years old and over, by sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, Foreign born, and Foreign-born parentage; 2010.
40.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Quickstats [Chart showing major field of study with a focus on STEM fields by Gender and Race/ethnicity]. NPSAS: 2008 Undergraduate Students. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/datalab/quickstats/createtable.aspx.
41.
von HippieP.Regression with missing y's: an improved strategy for analyzing multiple imputed data.Sociol Methodol.; 2007: 37.
42.
WatanabeM.Tracking in the era of high stakes state accountability reform: case studies of classroom instruction in North Carolina.Teach Coll Rec.2008; 110(3): 489–534.
43.
WaymanJ.Multiple imputation for missing data: What it is and how can I use it? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL; 2003, April.
44.
WernerK., BurrisC.C.Alternative approaches to the politics of detracking.Theor Pract.2006; 45(1): 90–9.
45.
YonezawaS.Unpacking the black box of tracking decisions: critical tales of families navigating the course of placement process. In: SandersM.G., editor. Schooling students placed at risk: research, policy, practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000; p. 109–140.
46.
YonezawaS.S., JonesM.Students perspectives on tracking and detracking.Theor Pract.2006; 45(1): 15–23.
47.
YonezawaS., WellsA.S., SernaI.Choosing tracks: freedom of choice in detracking schools.Am Educ Res J.2002; 39(1): 37–67.
