Hurricane Katrina induced hundreds of thousands of New Orleans citizens to evacuate and relocate to different neighborhoods. Some of these evacuees moved to neighborhoods with poverty rates lower than the one they left in New Orleans. With survey data on a small sample of black Katrina evacuees who registered for absentee voter ballots, this paper explores whether or not there were improvements in the welfare of black evacuees— neighborhood effects—as a result of moving to neighborhoods with a lower poverty rate. With data from a small sample of relocated Katrina evacuees, we provide matching estimates of the short-run treatment effect of different types of changes in neighborhood poverty on five different measures of individual welfare. Treatment parameter estimates reveal—conditional upon the change in origin to destination neighborhood poverty rate—positive neighborhood effects mostly for black evacuees who did not move from high poverty to low poverty neighborhoods, but could have. Our results suggest that at least in the short-run, antipoverty policies based on housing mobility and changing the poverty characteristics of neighborhoods are not necessarily effective in improving the welfare of poor black households.
AbadieA., DrukkerD., HerrJ.L., ImbensG.W.Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in stata.Stata J2001; 1: 1–18.
2.
AizerA., CurrieJ.Networks or neighborhoods? Correlations in the use of publicly-funded maternity care in California.J Public Econ2004; 88: 2573–85.
3.
AkerlofG.A.Social distance and social decisions.Econometrica1997; 65: 1005–8.
4.
AliprantisD.Assessing the evidence on neighborhood effects from moving to opportunity. Working Paper 11–22, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; 2011.
5.
AngristJ.D., KruegerA.B.Empirical strategies in labor economics. In: OrleyA., CardD., editors. Handbook of labor economics.1st ed. vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. p. 1277–1366.
6.
BenabouR.J.Heterogeneity, stratification, and growth: macroeconomic effects of community structure.Am Econ Rev1996; 86: 584–609.
7.
BethlehemJ.Weighting nonresponse adjustments based on auxiliary information. In: Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJA, editors. Survey nonresponse.New York: Wiley;2002. p. 275–8.
8.
BillyJ.O.G., BrewsterK.L., GradyW.R.Contextual effects on the sexual behavior of adolescent women.J Marriage Fam1994; 56: 387–404.
9.
BostonT.D.The effects of revitalization on public housing residents: a case study of the atlanta housing authority.J Am Plan Assoc2005; 71: 393–407.
DeLucaS., DuncanG.J., KeelsM., MendenhallR.Gautreaux mothers and their children: an update.Hous Policy Debate2010; 20: 7–25.
12.
DietzR.D.The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: an interdisciplinary approach.Soc Sci Res2002; 31: 539–75.
13.
DoyleJ.J.JrChild protection and child outcomes: measuring the effects of foster care.Am Econ Rev2007; 97: 1583–610.
14.
DuMouchelW.H., DuncanG.J.Using sample survey weights in multiple regression analysis of stratified samples.J Am Stat Assoc1983; 78: 535–43.
15.
DurlaufS.N.A theory of persistent income inequality.J Econ Growth1996; 1: 75–93.
16.
GrierP.The great Katrina migration.Christian Science Monitor; 12 September 2005.
17.
GrovesR.M.Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys.Public Opin Quart2006; 70: 646–75.
18.
HardingD.J.Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: the effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy.Am J Soc2003; 109: 676–719.
19.
HippJ.R.Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point.Am Soc Rev2007; 72: 659–80.
20.
ImbensG.W.Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review.Rev Econ Stat2004; 86: 4–29.
21.
ImbensG.W., RubinD.B.Causal inference in statistics and the medical and social sciences.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
JargowskyP.A.Poverty and place: ghettos, barrios, and the American city.New York: Russell Sage Foundation;1997.
24.
JencksC., MayerS.E.The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In: LynnL.E.Jr., McGearyM.G.H., editors. Inner-city poverty in the United States.Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990. p. 111–86.
25.
KatzL.F., KlingJ.R., LiebmanJ.B.Moving to opportunity in Boston: early results of a randomized mobility experiment.Q J Econ2001; 116: 607–54.
26.
KlingJ.R., LudwigJ., KatzL.F.Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: evidence from a randomized housing voucher.Q J Econ2005; 120: 87–130.
27.
KlingJ.R., LiebmanJ.B., KatzL.F.Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects.Econometrica2007; 75: 83–119.
28.
LochnerK.A., KawachiI., BrennanR.T., BukaS.L.Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago.Soc Sci Med2003; 56: 1797–805.
29.
LouryG.C.A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In: PhyllisW., La MondA.M., editors. Women, minorities, and employment discrimination.Lexington: Heath; 1977. p. 153–186.
30.
ManskiC.Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem.Rev Econ Stud1993; 60: 531–42.
31.
MasseyD.S., DentonN.American Apartheid.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.
32.
MendenhallR., DeLucaS., DuncanG.Neighborhood resources and economic mobility: results from the Gautreaux program.Soc Sci Res2006; 35: 892–923.
33.
PattersonR.Neighborhood effects on high-school drop-out rates and teenage childbearing: tests for non-linearities, race-specific effects, interactions with family characteristics, and endogenous causation using geocoded California census microdata. Discussion Paper CES 08–12, Center for Economic Studies, Bureau of the Census, Washington DC; 2008.
34.
PriceG.N., SpriggsW., SwintonO.The relative returns to graduating from a historically black college/university: propenstity score matching estimates from the national survey of black Americans.Rev Black Polit Econ2011; 38: 103–30.
35.
Ramirez-VallesJ., ZimmermanM.A., JuarezL.Gender differences of neighborhood and social control process: a study of the timing of first intercourse among low-achieving urban African American youth.Youth Soc2002; 33: 418–42.
36.
RosenbaumJ.Black pioneers: do move to the suburbs increase economic opportunity for mothers and children?Hous Policy Debate1992; 2: 1179–213.
37.
RosenbaumJ.Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: lessons from the Gautreaux program.Hous Policy Debate1995; 6: 231–69.
38.
RosenbaumP.R., RubinD.B.The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.Biometrika1983; 70: 41–55.
39.
SanbonmatsuL., KlingJ.R., DuncanG.J., Brooks-GunnJ.Neighborhoods and academic achievement: results from the moving to opportunity experiment. Working Paper #7, Education Research Section.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2004.
40.
TieboutC.A pure theory of local expenditures.J Polit Econ1956; 64: 416–24.
41.
VigdorJ.L.The Katrina effect: was there a bright side to the evacuation of greater New Orleans? B.E.J Econ Anal Policy2007; 7: Article 64.
42.
VigdorJ.L.The economic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.J Econ Perspect2008; 22: 135–54.
43.
WagnerP., EdwardsS.New Orleans by the numbers.Dollars and Sense2006; 264: 54–5.
44.
WhiteM.J.American neighborhoods and residential differentiation.New York: Russell Sage Foundation;1987.
45.
WilsonW.J.The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
