Monopolar transurethral resection of prostate has been the preferred surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Even in modern series there are significant risks such as haemorrhage requiring transfusion and TUR syndrome, although their incidence is lower than previously. Over the last decade or so newer technologies have emerged that have proven to be at least equivalent to monopolar TURP. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in normal saline is a potentially safer option to monopolar resection but with equivalent efficacy in the medium term. This is supported by 2 recent meta-analyses. This review describes the technology, efficacy and safety profile of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate.
RassweilerJ, TeberD, KuntzR, HofmannR. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) – incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol2006;50 (5): 969–79.
2.
MadersbacherS, AlivizatosG, NordlingJ, SanzCR, EmbertonM, de la RosetteJJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol2004; 46 (5): 547–54.
3.
ReichO, GratzkeC, BachmannA, SeitzM, SchlenkerB, HermanekP, et al. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: A prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol2008; 180 (1): 246–9.
4.
BottoH, LebretT, BarreP, OrsoniJL, HerveJM, LugagnePM. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J Endourol2001; 15 (3): 313–6.
5.
KayaC, IlktacA, GokmenE, OzturkM, KaramanIM. The long-term results of transurethral vaporization of the prostate using plasmakinetic energy. BJU Int2007; 99 (4): 845–8.
6.
HoHS, YipSK, LimKB, FookS, FooKT, ChengCW. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol2007; 52 (2): 517–22.
7.
AutorinoR, DamianoR, DiLG, QuartoG, PerdonaS, D'ArmientoM, et al. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol2009; 55 (4): 922–9.
8.
RassweilerJ, SchulzeM, StockC, TeberD, De LaRJ. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate – technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol2007; 16 (1): 11–21.
9.
AkgulKT, AyyildizA, NuhogluB, CaydereM, UstunH, GermiyanogluC. Comparison of transurethral prostate resection and plasmakinetic prostate resection according to cautery artefacts in tissue specimens. Int Urol Nephrol2007; 39 (4): 1091–6.
10.
HuangX, WangXH, WangHP, QuLJ. Comparison of the microvessel diameter of hyperplastic prostate and the coagulation depth achieved with mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. A pilot study on hemostatic capability. Scand J Urol Nephrol2008; 42 (3): 265–8.
11.
AhyaiSA, GillingP, KaplanSA, KuntzRM, MadersbacherS, MontorsiF, et al. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign pro-static enlargement. Eur Urol2010; 58 (3): 384–97.
12.
MamoulakisC, UbbinkDT, de la RosetteJJ. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol2009; 56 (5): 798–809.
13.
ChenQ, ZhangL, FanQL, ZhouJ, PengYB, WangZ. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: Results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int2010; 106 (9): 1339–43.
14.
EngelerDS, SchwabC, NeyerM, GrunT, ReissiglA, SchmidHP. Bipolar versus monopolar TURP: A prospective controlled study at two urology centers. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis2010; 13 (3): 285–91.
15.
MichielsenDP, CoomansD, PeetersI, BraeckmanJG. Conventional monopolar resection or bipolar resection in saline for the management of large (>60g) benign prostatic hyperplasia: An evaluation of morbidity. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol2010; 19 (4): 207–13.
16.
TefekliA, MuslumanogluAY, BaykalM, BinbayM, TasA, AltunrendeF. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: A prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol2005; 174 (4 Pt 1): 1339–43.
17.
MichielsenDP, CoomansD. Urethral strictures and bipolar transurethral resection in saline of the prostate: Fact or fiction?J Endourol2010;24 (8): 1333–7.
18.
IssaMM. Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: Bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol2008; 22 (8): 1587–95.
