Abstract
Purpose
The rate of unsatisfactory samples from ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations of thyroid nodules varies widely in the literature. We aimed to evaluate our thyroid ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy technique in the absence of on-site microscopic examination by a pathologist; determine factors that affect the adequacy rate, such as the number of needle passes and needle size; compare our results with the literature; and establish an optimal technique.
Materials and Methods
We performed a retrospective review of cytopathology reports from 252 consecutive thyroid ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies performed by a radiologist between 2005 and 2010 in our hospital's radiology department. Sample adequacy, the number of needle passes, and needle size were determined. There was an on-site cytologist who prepared slides immediately after fine-needle aspiration but no on-site microscopic assessment of sample adequacy to guide the number of needle passes that should be performed. Cytopathology biopsy reports were classified as either unsatisfactory or satisfactory samples for diagnosis; the latter consisted of benign, malignant, and undetermined diagnoses.
Results
Seventy-seven biopsies were performed with 1 needle pass, 124 with 2 needle passes, and 51 with 3 needle passes. The rates of unsatisfactory biopsies were 33.8%, 23.4% (odds ratio [OR] 0.599 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.319-1.123]; P = .110), and 13.7% (OR 0.312 [95% CI, 0.124-0.788]; P = .014), respectively.
Conclusion
In a hospital in which there is no on-site pathologist, a 3-pass method increases the specimen satisfactory rate by 20% compared with 1 pass, achieves similar rates to the literature, and provides a basis for further improvement of our practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.