Strategies for Reducing Radiation Exposure from Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Acute Care Setting

Abstract

French

Many tools and strategies exist to enable reduction of radiation exposure from computed tomography (CT). The common CT metrics of x-ray output, the volume CT dose index and the dose-length product, are explained and serve as the basis for monitoring radiation exposure from CT. Many strategies to dose-optimize CT protocols are explored that, in combination with available hardware and software tools, allow robust diagnostic quality CT to be performed with a radiation exposure appropriate for the clinical scenario and the size of the patient. Specific emergency department example protocols are used to demonstrate these techniques.

Keywords

Computed tomography Radiation exposure Computed tomography dose index Dose-length product Protocols Strategies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

IMV Medical Information Division. Benchmark Report CT 2007

2007

IMV Medical Information Division

Des Plaines, IL

Brenner

D.J.

Hall

E.J.

Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure

N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277–2284.

Sodickson

Baeyens

P.F.

Andriole

K.P.

Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults

Radiology 2009; 251:175–184.

Berrington de Gonzalez

Mahesh

Kim

K.P.

Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007

Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:2071–2077.

Mettler

F.A.

Bhargavan

Faulkner

Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950-2007

Radiology 2009; 253:520–531.

Fazel

Krumholz

H.M.

Wang

Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures

N Engl J Med 2009; 361:849–857.

Amis

E.S.

Butler

P.F.

Applegate

K.E.

American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine

J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4:272–284.

Wells

P.S.

Anderson

D.R.

Rodger

Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer

Ann Intern Med 2001; 135:98–107.

Stiell

I.G.

Wells

G.A.

Vandemheen

The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury

Lancet 2001; 357:1391–1396.

10.

Stiell

I.G.

Wells

G.A.

Vandemheen

K.L.

The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients

JAMA 2001 1841 286

11.

Khorasani

Can radiology professional society guidelines be converted to effective decision support?

J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7:561–562.

12.

American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Available at: http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality_safety/app_criteria.aspx. Accessed June 8, 2011.

13.

Raja

A.S.

I.K.

Prevedello

L.M.

Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department

Radiology 2012; 262:468–474.

14.

Griffey

R.T.

Sodickson

Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192:887–892.

15.

Birnbaum

Radiation safety in the era of helical CT: a patient-based protection program currently in place in two community hospitals in New Hampshire

J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5:714–718e5.

16.

Sodickson

Opraseuth

Ledbetter

Outside imaging in emergency department transfer patients: CD import reduces rates of subsequent imaging utilization

Radiology 2011; 260:408–413.

17.

Flanagan

P.T.

Relyea-Chew

Gross

J.A.

Using the Internet for image transfer in a regional trauma network: effect on CT repeat rate, cost, and radiation exposure

J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9:648–656.

18.

M.T.

Tellis

W.M.

Fidelman

Reducing the rate of repeat imaging: import of outside images to PACS

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198:628–634.

19.

Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of Defensive Medicine in Massachusetts. 2008. Available at: www.massmed.org/defensivemedicine. Accessed September 9, 2011.

20.

Levin

D.C.

Rao

V.M.

The effect of self-referral on utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196:848–852.

21.

McNitt-Gray

M.F.

AAPM/RSNA Physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT

Radiographics 2002; 22:1541–1553.

22.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine

The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report 96. AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee

2008

American Association of Physicists in Medicine

College Park, MD

23.

McCollough

C.H.

Leng

CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing

Radiology 2011; 259:311–316.

24.

Turner

A.C.

Zhang

Khatonabadi

The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams

Med Phys 2011; 38:820–829.

25.

Huda

Vance

Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT

AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 2007 540

26.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204: Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. College Park, MD: One Physics Ellipse; 2011.

27.

Shrimpton

Assessment of patient dose in CT. NRPB-PE/1/2004. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board, 2004. Also available at http://www.msct.eu/PDF_FILES/Appendix%20paediatric%20CT%20Dosimetry.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2013.

28.

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

29.

McCollough

C.H.

Christner

J.A.

Kofler

J.M.

How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194:890–896.

30.

Padilla A, Alquist EK. California Senate Bill 1237. 2010. Available at: http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1237_bill_20100929_chaptered.html. Accessed February 4, 2013.

31.

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Radiation Dose Reduction—White Paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm. Accessed December 24, 2010.

32.

Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. 2004. Available at: http://www.msct.eu/CT_Quality_Criteria.htm. Accessed June 8, 2011.

33.

The American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical X-Ray Imaging. 2008. Available at: www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/med_phys/reference_levels.aspx. Accessed September 9, 2011.

34.

Kalra

M.K.

Maher

M.M.

Toth

T.L.

Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization

Radiology 230 2004 619

35.

McCollough

C.H.

Primak

A.N.

Braun

Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT

Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47:27–40.

36.

The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. Image Gently. Available at: http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/index.cfm?page=614. Accessed May 26, 2011.

37.

Strauss

K.J.

Goske

M.J.

Kaste

S.C.

Image Gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients

AJR Am J Roentgenol 194 2010 868

38.

Kalendar

W.A.

Computed Tomography 3rd ed. 2011

Publicis Publishing

Erlangen, Germany

39.

McCollough

C.H.

Bruesewitz

M.R.

Kofler

J.M.

CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options

Radiographics 2006; 26:503–512.

40.

Sodickson

, Turner

, McGlamery

, Variation in organ dose from abdomen-pelvis CT exams performed with tube current modulation (TCM): evaluation of patient size effects. Paper presented at the 96th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiographic Society of North America. November 28-December 3, 2010; Chicago, IL.

41.

Israel

G.M.

Cicchiello

Brink

Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control

AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 1342

42.

FDA. Safety Investigation of CT Brain Perfusion Scans: Update 11/9/2010. 2010. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm185898.htm. Accessed June 6, 2011.

43.

Chandarana

Godoy

M.C.B.

Vlahos

Abdominal aorta: evaluation with dual-source dual-energy multidetector CT after endovascular repair of aneurysms–initial observations

Radiology 2008; 249:692–700.

44.

Vlahos

Godoy

M.C.B.

Naidich

D.P.

Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the aorta

J Thorac Imaging 2010; 25:289–300.

45.

Chow

L.C.

Kwan

S.W.

Olcott

E.W.

Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement

AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 2007 314

46.

Deak

P.D.

Langner

Lell

Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT

Radiology 252 2009 140

47.

Ptak

Rhea

J.T.

Novelline

R.A.

Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi–detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience

Radiology 229 2003 902

48.

Nguyen

Platon

Shanmuganathan

Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma

AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 2009 3

49.

Poletti

P.A.

Platon

Rutschmann

O.T.

Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic

AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 2007 927

50.

Bae

K.T.

Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches

Radiology 256 2010 32

51.

Sodickson

Weiss

Effects of patient size on radiation dose reduction and image quality in low-kVp CT pulmonary angiography performed with reduced IV contrast dose

Emerg Radiol 2012; 19:437–445.

52.

Menke

Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults

Radiology 236 2005 565

53.

Luaces

Akers

Litt

Low kVp imaging for dose reduction in dual-source cardiac CT

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 25:165–175.

54.

Grant K, Schmidt B. CARE kV—Automated Dose-Optimized Selection of X-ray Tube Voltage. White Paper. Siemens; 2011. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/gg_ct_FBAs/files/Case_Studies/CarekV_White_Paper.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2011.

55.

Fletcher

J.G.

Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy

Med Phys 2010; 37:234–243.

56.

AAPM Position Statement on the Use of Bismuth Shielding for the Purpose of Dose Reduction in CT scanning. 2012. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/. Accessed February 4, 2013.

57.

Modica

M.J.

Kanal

K.M.

Gunn

M.L.

The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions

Radiographics 2011; 31:811–823.

58.

Thibault, Jean-Baptiste. Veo—CT Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction. Available at: http://www.gehealthcare.com/dose/pdfs/Veo_white_paper.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2012.

59.

Siemens. SAFIRE—Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction. Available at: https://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_INT/gg_ct_FBAs/files/brochures/SAFIRE_Brochure.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2012.

60.

Irwan R, Nakanishi S, Blum A. AIDR 3D—Reduces Dose and Simultaneously Improves Image Quality. Available at: http://www.toshiba-medical.eu/upload/TMSE_CT/White%20Papers/White%20Papers/Toshiba_White%20paper%20CT_nov11.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2012.

61.

Philips. iDose4 iterative reconstruction technique. Available at: http://www.healthcare.philips.com/pwc_hc/main/shared/Assets/Documents/ct/idose_white_paper_452296267841.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2012.

62.

Sodickson

Khorasani

Patient-centric radiation dose monitoring in the electronic health record: what are some of the barriers and key next steps?

J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7:752–753.

63.

Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 127: CT Radiation Dose Reporting (Dose SR). 2007. Available at: ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup127_ft.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2013.

64.

Cook

T.S.

Zimmerman

S.L.

Steingall

S.R.

Informatics in radiology: RADIANCE: an automated, enterprise-wide solution for archiving and reporting CT radiation dose estimates

Radiographics 2011; 31:1833–1846.

65.

Sodickson

Warden

G.I.

Farkas

C.E.

Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring

Radiology 2012; 264:397–405.

66.

Shih

Z.F.

Zabih

Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:1170–1174.