This paper reviews the literature on colorectal cancer from a sex and gender-based perspective. Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death in the developed world, with rates increasing in developing countries. Although described by some writers as an ‘equal opportunity’ disease, it presents more risk to men than women. Both biological, or sex-linked factors, and gender-linked factors play a part in the aetiology of the disease, while gender differences in the use of screening and treatment also help shape the mortality gap between women and men for this condition. Without an appreciation of the part played by sex and gender in the risk of colorectal cancer, and without a gender-sensitive approach to screening in particular, it is possible that the mortality gap between men and women for this condition will widen in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WHO, The World Health Report 2004: Changing History. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
2.
OsiasG.L., OsiasK.B., SrinivasanR.Colorectal cancer in women: an equal opportunity disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2001; 101:S7–S12.
3.
WizemanT., PardueM.Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter?. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
4.
KriegerN., ZierlerS.H.Accounting for the health of women. Curr Issues Public Health, 1995; 1:251–256.
5.
KriegerN.Genders, sexes and health: what are the connections – and why does it matter?. Int J Epidemiol, 2003; 32:652–657.
6.
LegatoJ.The International Association for Gender-Specific Medicine. Gend Med, 2006; 32:69.
7.
BrayF., AtkinW.International cancer patterns in men: geographical and temporal variations in cancer risk and the role of gender. jmhg, 2004; 1:38–46.
SlatteryM.L., KinneyA.Y., LevinT.R.Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a population-based study: the impact of gender health care source and time. Prev Med, 2004; 38:276–283.
10.
FrazierA.L., ColditzG.A., FuchsC.S., KuntzK.M.Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. J Am Med Assoc, 2000; 284:1954–1961.
11.
JemalA., SiegelR., WardE., MurrayT., XuJ., SmigalC., et al.Cancer Statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin, 2006; 56:106–130.
12.
PinheiroP.S., TyczynskiJ.E., BrayF., AmadoJ., MatosE., ParkinD.M.Cancer incidence and mortality in Portugal. Eur J Cancer, 2003; 39:2507–2520.
13.
WingoP.A., CardinezC.J., LandisS.H., GreenleeR.T., RiesL.A.G., AndersonR.N., et al.Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States 1930–1998. Cancer, 2003; 97:3133–3275.
14.
BurkeW., BeekerC., KraftJ.M., PinskyL.Engaging women's interest in colorectal cancer screening: a public health strategy. J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 2000; 9:363–371.
15.
BrayF., SankilaR., FerlayJ., ParkinD.M.Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. Eur J Cancer, 2002; 38:99–166.
16.
FernandezE., BosettiC., La VecchiaC., LeviF., FiorettiF., NegriE.Sex differences in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe, 1955–1996. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2000; 9:99–104.
17.
RiesL.A., WingoP.A., MillerD.S., HoweH.L., WeirH.K., RosenbergH.M., et al.The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer 1973–1997 with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer, 2000; 88:2398–2424.
18.
IrbyK., AndersonW.F., HensonD.E., DevesaS.S.Emerging and widening colorectal carcinoma disparities between blacks and whites in the United States (1975–2002). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006; 15:792–797.
19.
MarrettL.D., ChaudhryM.Cancer incidence and mortality in Ontario First Nations 1968–1991 (Canada). Cancer Causes Control, 2003; 14:259–268.
20.
WildS.H., FischbacherC.M., BrockA., GriffithsC., BhopalR.Mortality from all cancers and lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer by country of birth in England and Wales 2001–2003. Br J Cancer, 2006; 94:1079–1085.
21.
TheuerC.P., TaylorT.H., BrewsterW.R., Anton-CulverH.Gender and race/ethnicity affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Med Assoc, 2006; 98:51–57.
22.
SwanJ., EdwardsB.K.Cancer rates among American Indians and Alaska Natives: is there a national perspective?. Cancer, 2003; 98:1262–1272.
23.
CepedaO.A., GammackJ.K.Cancer in older men: a gender-based review. Ageing Male, 2006; 9:149–158.
24.
Angell-AndersenE., TretliS., ColemanM.P., LangmarkF., GrotmolT.Colorectal cancer survival trends in Norway 1958–1997. Eur J Cancer, 2004; 40:734–742.
25.
WoodsS.E., NarayananK., EngelA.The influence of gender on colon cancer stage. J Womens Health, 2005; 14:502–506.
26.
GonzalezE.C., RoetzheimR.G., FerranteJ.M., CampbellR.Predictors of proximal vs. distal colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001; 44:251–258.
27.
WuX.C., ChenV.W., SteeleB., RuizB., FultonJ., LiuL., CarozzaS.E., et al.Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender and age group in the United States 1992–1997. Cancer, 2001; 92:2547–2554.
28.
WichmannM.W., MullerC., HornungH.M., Lau-WernerU., SchildbergF.W.Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer [see comment]. Br J Surg, 2001; 88:1092–1098.
29.
IshikuboT., NishimuraY., YamaguchiK., KhansuwanU., AraiY., KobayashiT., et al.The clinical features of rectal cancers with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in Japanese males. Cancer Lett, 2004; 216:55–62.
30.
BreivikJ., LotheR.A., MelingG.I., RognumT.O., Borresen-DaleA.L., GaudernackG.Different genetic pathways to proximal and distal colorectal cancer influenced by sex-related factors. Int J Cancer, 1997; 74:664–669.
31.
KeatingJP, PaterP, LoloheaS, WickremesekeraJK. The epidemiology of colorectal cancer: what can we learn from the New Zealand Cancer Registry?. N Z Med J, 2003; 116: U437. Available at: http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1174/437 Accessed 13/04/06.
32.
LiebermanD.Race, gender, and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005; 100:2756–2758.
33.
PrihartonoN., PalmerJ.R., LouikC., ShapiroS., RosenbergL.A case–control study of use of postmenopausal female hormone supplements in relation to the risk of large bowel cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2000; 9:443–447.
34.
NelsonR.L., PerskyV., TurykM.Determination of factors responsible for the declining incidence of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999; 42:741–752.
35.
RosenA.B., SchneiderE.C.Colorectal cancer screening disparities related to obesity and gender. J Gen Intern Med, 2004; 19:332–338.
36.
MooreL.L., BradleeM.L., SingerM.R., SplanskyG.L., ProctorM.H., EllisonR.C., et al.BMI and waist circumference as predictors of lifetime colon cancer risk in Framingham Study adults. Int J Obesity, 2004; 28:559–567.
37.
CaanB.J., CoatesA.O., SlatteryM.L., PotterJ.D., QuesenberryC.P.Jr., EdwardsS.M.Body size and the risk of colon cancer in a large case–control study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 1998; 22:178–184.
38.
RussoA., FranceschiS., La VecchiaC., Dal MasoL., MontellaM., ContiE., et al.Body size and colorectal-cancer risk. Int J Cancer, 1998; 78:161–165.
39.
ZhangJ., SuX.Q., ZhengJ.Q., GuJ., ZongX.L., WangY., et al.Effect of body mass index on colorectal cancer. Chin J Cancer Res, 2003; 15:189–194.
40.
AhmedR.L., SchmitzK.H., AndersonK.E., RosamundW.D., FolsomA.R.The metabolic syndrome and risk of incident colorectal cancer. Cancer, 2006; 107:28–36.
41.
BostromG., DiderichsenF.Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data. Int J Epidemiol, 1997; 26:860–866.
42.
Bolton-SmithC., WoodwardM., Tunstall-PedoeH., MorrisonC.Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population. J Epidemiol Commun Health, 2000; 54:143–148.
43.
CummingsJ., BinghamS.Diet and the prevention of cancer. BMJ, 1998; 317:1636–1640.
44.
NoratT., BinghamS., FerrariP., SlimaniN., JenabM., MazuirM., et al.Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005; 97:906–916.
45.
MathewA., PetersU., ChatterjeeN., KulldorffM., SinhaR.Fat, fiber, fruits, vegetables and risk of colorectal adenomas. Int J Cancer, 2004; 108:287–292.
46.
HillM.Meat, cancer and dietary advice to the public. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2002; 56:S36–S41.
47.
SinhaR., ChowW.H., KulldorffM., DenobileJ., ButlerJ., Garcia-ClosasM., et al.Well-done grilled red meat increases the risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Res, 1999; 59:4320–4324.
RahmanA.On Measuring Intrahousehold Inequality in Food Distribution – Is the Conventional Calorie Intake Measure Enough to Understand Individual Wellbeing within the Household?. London: London School of Economics; 2002.
50.
StibbeA.Health and the social construction of masculinity in Men's Health magazine. Men Masculinities, 2004; 7:31–51.
51.
MaJ., GiovannucciE., PollakM., ChanJ.M., GazianoJ.M., WillettW., et al.Milk intake circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of colorectal cancer in men. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2001; 93:1330–1416.
52.
SuL.J., ArabL.Tea consumption and the reduced risk of colon cancer – results from a national prospective cohort study. Public Health Nutr, 2002; 5:419–425.
53.
BinghamS.A., DayN.E., LubenR., FerrariP., SlimaniN., NoratT., et al.Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet, 2003; 361:1496–1501.
54.
JenabM., FerrariP., SlimaniN., NoratT., CasagrandeC., OveradK., et al.Association of nut and seed intake with colorectal cancer risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2004; 13:1595–1603.
55.
TerryP., HuF.B., HansenH., WolkA.Prospective study of major dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk in women. Am J Epidemiol, 2001; 154:1143–1149.
56.
ShephardR.J., ShekP.N.Associations between physical activity and susceptibility to cancer – possible mechanisms. Sports Med, 1998; 26:293–315.
57.
ThuneI., FurbergA.S.Physical activity and cancer risk: dose-response and cancer, all sites and site-specific. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2001; 33:S530–S550.
58.
O’Brien CousinsS., GillisM.M.“Just do it before you talk yourself out of it”: the self-talk of adults thinking about physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2004; 6:313–334.
59.
McQueenA., VernonS.W., MeissnerH.I., KlabundeC.N., RakowskiW.Are there gender differences in colorectal cancer test use prevalence and correlates? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006; 15:782–791.
60.
ZismanA.L., NickolovA., BrandR.E., GorchowA., RoyH.K.Associations between the age at diagnosis and location of colorectal cancer and the use of alcohol and tobacco: implications for screening. Arch Intern Med, 2006; 166:629–634.
61.
ColangeloL.A., GapsturS.M., GannP.H., DyerA.R.Cigarette smoking and colorectal carcinoma mortality in a cohort with long-term follow-up. Cancer, 2003; 100:2288–2293.
62.
JiB.T., ChowW., DaiQ., McLaughlinJ.K., BenichouJ., HatchM.C., et al.Cigarette and alcohol consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer in Shanghai China. Eur J Cancer Prevent, 2002; 11:237–244.
63.
StollB.A.Association between breast and colorectal cancers. Br J Surg, 1998; 85:1468–1472.
64.
SlatteryM.L., Ballard-BarbashR., PotterJ.D., MaK.N., CaanB.J., AndersonK., et al.Sex-specific differences in colon cancer associated with p53 mutations. Nutr Cancer, 2004; 49:41–48.
65.
Department of Health & Ageing, Australia. The Australian Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: Analysis of Routinely Collected Screening Data. Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Monitoring and Evaluation Steering Committee: Canberra, 2004.
66.
NagataC.Ecological study of the association between soy product intake and mortality from cancer and heart disease in Japan. Int J Epidemiol, 2000; 29:832–836.
67.
Office for National Statistics (ONS), Mortality Statistics Cause. Series DH2. London: ONS; 2005.
