Anon. Editors choice: Knowing when not to operate. BMJ, 1999; 318:(Anonymous leader).
2.
PrattE.H.Orificial Surgery and its Application to the Treatment of Chronic Diseases. Chicago: W.T. Keener; 1887.
3.
RemondinoP.C.History of Circumcision from the Earliest Times to the Present: Moral and Physical Reasons for its Performance. Philadelphia and London: F.A. Davis; 1891.
4.
HutchinsonJ.On circumcision as preventive of masturbation. Arch Surg, 1891; 2:267–268.
5.
WolbarstA.J.Circumcision and penile cancer. Lancet, 1932; 2:150–153.
6.
SchoenE.J., OehrliM., ColbyC.J., MachinG.The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics, 2000; 105(3):e36–e39.
7.
CookL.S., KoutskyL.A., HolmesK.K.Circumcision and sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Public Health, 1994; 84:197–201.
8.
WiswellT.E., EnzenauerR.W., HoltonM.E., CornishJ.D., HankinsC.T.Declining frequency of circumcision: implications for changes in the absolute incidence and sex ratio of urinary tract infections in early infancy. Pediatrics, 1987; 79:338–342.
9.
RobinsonF.O., JohnstonS.R., AtkinsonA.B.Accelerated hypertension caused by severe phimosis. J Hum Hypertens, 1992; 6(2):165–166.
10.
WeissG.N.Prophylactic neonatal surgery and infectious diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1997; 16(8):727–734.
11.
FinkA.J.A possible explanation for heterosexual male infection with AIDS. New Engl J Med, 1986; 315:1167.
12.
AuvertB., TaljaardD., LagardeE., Sobngwi-TambekouJ., SittaR., PurenA.Randomized controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med, 2005; 2(11):e298.
13.
BaileyR.C., MosesS., ParkerC.B., AgotK., MacleanI., KriegerJ.N., et al.Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2007; 369:643–656.
14.
GrayR.H., KigoziG., SerwaddaD., MakumbiF., WatyaS., NalugodaF., et al.Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2007; 369:657–666.
15.
MillsE., SiegfriedN.Cautious optimism for new HIV/AIDS prevention strategies. Lancet, 2006; 368(9543):1236.
16.
KwakC., OhS.J., LeeA., ChoiH.Effect of circumcision on urinary tract infection after successful antireflux surgery. BJU Int, 2004; 94(4):627–629.
17.
TaylorJ.R., LockwoodA.P., TaylorA.J.The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol, 1996; 77:291–295.
18.
TavesD.The intromission function of the foreskin. Med Hypotheses, 2002; 59(2):180–182.
19.
SorrellsM.L., SnyderJ.L., ReissM.D., EdenC., MilosM.F., WilcoxN., et al.Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis. BJU Int, 2007; 99:864–869.
20.
WarrenJ., SmithF.D., DaltonJ.D., EdwardsG.R., FodenM., PrestonR., et al.Circumcision of children. BMJ, 1996; 312:377.
21.
PatelH.The problem of routine circumcision. Can Med Assoc J, 1966; 95:576–581.
22.
de la HuntM.N.Paediatric day care surgery: a hidden burden for primary care?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1999; 81:179–182.
23.
WilliamsN., KapilaL.Complications of circumcision. Brit J Surg, 1993; 80:1231–1236.
24.
MasoodS., PatelH.R., HimpsonR.C., PalmerJ.H., MuftiG.R., SheriffM.K.Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: are we informing men correctly?. Urol Int, 2005; 75(1):62–66.
25.
CourseyJ.W., MoreyA.F., McAninchJ.W., SummertonD.J., SecrestC., WhiteP., et al.Erectile function after anterior urethroplasty. J Urol, 2001; 166(6):2273–2276.
26.
FinkK.S., CarsonC.C., DeVellisR.F.Adult Circumcision Outcomes Study: effect on erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and satisfaction. J Urol, 2002; 167(5):2113–2116.
27.
British Medical Association. The Law and Ethics of Male Circumcision: Guidance for Doctors. London: BMA; 2006.
28.
HumphreysS.Is it time to return to the ‘gold standard’ of self-experimentation?. Res Ethics Rev, 2007; 3:1: 5–7.
29.
Anon. A charter for children in hospital. Lancet, 1984; 2(8415):1350.
30.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 1995; 95(2):314–317.
31.
GriffithsD.M., FrankJ.D.Inappropriate circumcision referrals by GPs. J Roy Soc Med, 1992; 85:324–325.
32.
RickwoodA.M.K., WalkerJ.Is phimosis overdiagnosed and are too many circumcisions performed as a result?. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl, 1989; 71:275–277.
33.
WilliamsN., ChellJ., KapilaL.Why are children referred for circumcision?. BMJ, 1993; 306:28.
34.
FarshiZ., AtkinsonK.R., SquireR.A study of clinical opinion and practice regarding circumcision. Arch Dis Child, 2000; 83:393–396.
35.
HuntleyJ.S., BourneM.C., MunroF.D., Wilson-StoreyD.Troubles with the foreskin: one hundred consecutive referrals to paediatric surgeons. J Roy Soc Med, 2003; 96(9):449–451.
36.
CathcartP., NuttallM., van der MeulenJ., EmbertonM., KennyS.E.Trends in paediatric circumcision and its complications in England between 1997 and 2003. Br J Surg, 2006; 93(7):885–890.
37.
Department of Health. Government response to the reports of the Health Committee on Health Services for Children and Young People, session 1996–97. Series no: Cm 3793. London: Department of Health; 1997.
38.
GisselquistD., PotteratJ.J., BrodyS., VachonF.Let it be sexual: how health care transmission of AIDS in Africa was ignored. Int J STD AIDS, 2003; 14:148–161.
de WitteL., NabatovA., PionM., FluitsmaD., de JongM.A., de GruijlT., et al.Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells. Nat Med, 2007; 13(3):367–371.
41.
ØsterJ.Further fate of the foreskin. Arch Dis Child, 1968; 43:200–203.
42.
Morales ConcepcionJ.C., Cordies JacksonE., Guerra RodriguezM., Mora CasacoB., Morales AraneguiA., Gonzalez FernandezP.Should circumcision be performed in childhood?. Arch Esp Urol, 2002; 55(7):807–811.
43.
KayabaH., TamuraH., KitajimaS., FujiwaraY., KatoT., KatoT.Analysis of shape and retractability of the prepuce in 603 Japanese boys. J Urol, 1996; 156:1813–1815.
44.
AgarwalA., MohtaA., AnandR.K.Preputial retraction in children. J Ind Assoc Pediatr Surg, 2005; 10(2):89–91.
45.
ThorvaldsenM.A., MeyhoffH.H.Patologisk eller fysiologisk fimose? [Pathological or physiological phimosis?]. Ugeskr Laeger, 2005; 167(17):1858–1862.
46.
RickwoodA.M.K.Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int, 1999; 83(Suppl 1):45–51.
47.
RickwoodA.M.K., KennyE., DonnellC.Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice. Br Med J, 2000; 321:792–793.
BabuR., HarrisonS.K., HuttonK.A.Ballooning of the foreskin and physiological phimosis: is there any objective evidence of obstructed voiding?. BJU Int, 2004; 94(3):384–387.
50.
HinchliffeS.A., CiftciA.O., KhineM.M., RickwoodA.M.K., AshwoodJ., McGillF., et al.Composition of the inflammatory infiltrate in pediatric penile lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (balanitis xerotica obliterans): a prospective, comparative immunophenotyping study. Pediatr Pathol, 1994; 14:223–233.
51.
LaymonC.W., FreemanC.Relationship of balanitis xerotica obliterans to lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Arch Derm Syph, 1994; 49:57–59.
52.
PotterB.Balanitis xerotica obliterans manifesting on stump of amputated penis; report of an unusual case and remarks on the nature of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Arch Derm, 1959; 79:473–476.
53.
RatzJ.L.Carbon dioxide laser treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1984; 10:925–928.
54.
PasiecznyT.A.H.The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans with testosterone propionate ointment. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh), 1977; 57:275–277.
55.
ClarkC., HuntleyJ.S., MunroF.D., Wilson-StoreyD.Managing the paediatric foreskin. Practitioner, 2004; 248(1665):888–894.
56.
BeaugéM.D.The causes of adolescent phimosis. Br J Sex Med, 1997; 24(5):26.
57.
ZampieriN., CorroppoloM., CamoglioF.S., GiacomelloL., OttolenghiA.Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids?. J Pediatr, 2005; 147(5):705–706.
BerdeuD., SauzeL., Ha-VinhP., Blum-BoisgardC.Cost-effectiveness of treatments for phimosis: a comparison of surgical and medicinal approaches and their economic effect. BJU Int, 2001; 87:239–244.
60.
Van HoweR.S.Cost-effective treatment of phimosis. Pediatrics, 1998; 102:E43.
61.
HoffmanS., MetzP., EbbehojJ.A new operation for phimosis: prepuce saving technique with multiple Y-V plasties. Br J Urol, 1984; 56:319–321.
62.
de CastellaH.Prepuceplasty: an alternative to circumcision. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl, 1994; 76(4):257–258.
63.
CuckowP.M., RixG., MouriquandP.D.E.Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision. J Pediatr Surg, 1994; 29(4):561–563.
64.
CuckowP., MouriquandP.Saving the normal foreskin. BMJ, 1993; 306:459–460.
65.
EmmettA.J.J.Z Plasty reconstruction for preputial stenosis: A surgical alternative to circumcision. Aust Paediatr J, 1992; 18:219–220.
66.
FleetM.S., VenyoA.K.G., RangecroftL.Dorsal relieving incision for the non-retractile foreskin. J Royal Coll Surg Edinb., 1995; 40:243–245.
67.
ParkashS.Phimosis and its plastic correction. J Ind Med Assoc, 1972; 58:389.
68.
CiciaS., FlorioG.Postectomy for phimosis: 5 year experience. Chir Ital, 2000; 52(6):733–736.
69.
WhalinN.‘Triple Incision Plasty’ a convenient procedure for preputial relief. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1992; 26:107–110.
70.
HolmlundD.Dorsal incision of the prepuce and closure with dexon in patients with phimosis. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1973; 7:97–99.
71.
GaetiniA.M.Preputial plastic surgery creating a two-way sliding rim in the treatment of phimosis. Minerva Pediatr, 1984; 36(18):905–907.
72.
LaneT.M., SouthL.M.Lateral prepuceplasty for phimosis. J Roy Coll Surg Edinb, 1999; 44:310–312.
73.
CodegaG., GuizzardiD., Di GiuseppeP., FassiP.Helicoid plasty in the treatment of phimosis. Minerva Chir, 1983; 38(22):1903–1907.
74.
SaxenaA.K., SchaarschmidtK., ReichA., WillitalG.H.Non-retractile foreskin: a single center 13-year experience. Int Surg, 2000; 85(2):180–183.
75.
BirleyH.D.L., WalkerM.M., LuzziG.A., BellR., Taylor-RobinsonD., ByrneM., et al.Clinical features and management of recurrent balanitis; association with atopy and genital washing. Genitourin Med, 1993; 69:400–403.
76.
KohnF.M.Skin changes of the penis. Differentiation between local findings and systemic diseases!. MMW Fortschr Med, 2002; 144(12):30–35[In German].
77.
LindhagenT.Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of the unretractable foreskin. Eur J Surg, 1996; 162:969–972.
78.
KissA., CsontaiA., PirotL., NyiradyP., MerkszM., KiralyL.The response of balanitis xerotica obliterans to local steroid application compared with placebo in children. J Urol, 2001; 165(1):219–220.
79.
JorgensenE.T., SvenssonA.The treatment of phimosis in boys, with a potent topical steroid (clobetasol propionate 0.05%) cream. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh), 1993; 73(1):55–56.
DattaC., DuttaS.R., ChaudhuriA.Histopathological and immunological studies in a cohort of balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Ind Med Assoc, 1993; 91:146–148.
82.
PrideH.B., MillerF., TylerW.A.Penile squamous cell carcinoma arising from balanitis obliterans. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1993; 29:469–473.
HrebinkoR.L.Circumferential laser vaporization for severe meatal stenosis secondary to balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Urol, 1996; 156:1735–1736.
86.
JorgensenE.T., SvenssonA.Problems with the penis and prepuce in children. Lichen sclerosus should be treated with corticosteroids to reduce need for surgery. Br Med J, 1996; 313(7058):692.
87.
DasS., TunuguntlaH.S.Balanitis xerotica obliterans – a review. World J Urol, 2000; 18(6):382–387.
