Adding instructional time and holding teachers accountable for teaching social studies are touted as practical, logical steps toward reforming the age-old tradition of marginalization. This qualitative case study of an urban elementary school, examines how nine teachers and one administrator enacted district reforms that added 45 min to the instructional day and implemented a series of formative and summative assessments. Through classroom observations, interviews, time journals, and official school documents, this article describes underlying perceptions and priorities that were barriers to any positive impact time or testing might have afforded social studies. Two recommendations emerge from results: 1) time structures need to provide space for the teaching of and planning for social studies; and 2) testing can have positive outcomes, but these are limited when assessments structures are hierarchical, misaligned, and poorly communicated.
AllemanJ.BrophyJ.Powerful units on food, clothing, and shelter12001HeinemanPortsmouth, NH
2.
AuW.Coring social studies within corporate education reform: The Common Core State Standards, social justice, and the politics of knowledge in U.S. schoolsCritical Education4520131–16
3.
AuW.High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesisEducational Researcher3652007258–267
4.
AuW.High-stakes testing and curriculum control: A qualitative metasynthesisFlindersD.J.ThorntonS.The curriculum reader2009RoutledgeNew York, NY286–302
5.
Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2010). A National Perspective on the Effects of High-Stakes Testing and Standardization on Elementary Social Studies Marginalization. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 114-130.
6.
AuthorNational trends in elementary instruction: Exploring the role of social studies curriculaThe Social Studies103201267–72
7.
AuthorTipping the scales: National trends of declining instructional time in elementary schoolsJournal of Social Studies Research3622012190–215
8.
Fitchett, P. G., Heafner, T. L., & Lambert, R. (2014a). Assessment, autonomy, and elementary social studies time. Teachers College Record, 116(10), 1-34.
9.
Fitchett, P. G., Heafner, T. L., & Lambert, R. (2014b). Examining social studies marginalization: A multilevel analysis. Educational Policy, 28(1), 40-68.
10.
AuthorOne state closer to a national crises: A report on elementary social studies in North Carolina schoolsTheory and Research in Social Education3442006455–483
11.
BartonK.C.LevstikL.S.Teaching history for the common good2004Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, IncMahwah, NJ
12.
BrophyJ.AllemanJ.Early elementary social studiesLevstikL.S.TysonC.A.Handbook of research in social studies education2008New York: RoutledgeNew York33–49
13.
BrophyJ.AllemanJ.KnightonB.Inside the social studies classroom2009RoutledgeNew York, NY
14.
BurroughsS.GroceE.WebeckM.L.Social studies education in the age of testing and accountabilityEducational Measurement: Issue and Practice200513–20
15.
Center on Educational PolicyChoices, changes, challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era2007Center on Educational PolicyWashington, DC
16.
Center on Educational PolicyInstructional time in elementary schools: A closer look at changes for specific subjects2008Centor on Educational PolicyWashington, DC
17.
CharmazK.Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis2006SageThousands Oaks, CA
18.
Council of Chief State School OfficersThe college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: State guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economic, geography, and history2013Council of Chief State School OfficersWashington, D.C
19.
CreswellJ.W.Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research2011Addison WesleyBoston, MA
20.
CroccoM.S.CostiganA.T.The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability urban educators speak outUrban Education4262007512–535
21.
FrabmanD.KaplanC.Time for a change: The promise of extended-time schools for promoting student achievement2005Massachusetts 2020Boston
22.
GerwinD.VisoneF.The freedom to teach: Contrasting teaching in elective and state-tested coursesTheory Research in Social Education3422006259–282
23.
GradwellJ.M.Teaching in spite of rather than because of, the testGrantS.G.Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across states2006Information Age PublishingGreenwich, CT157–176
24.
GrantS.G.An uncertain lever: Exploring the influence of state-level testing in New York state on teaching social studiesTeachers College Record10332001398–426
25.
GrantS.G.History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. high school classrooms2003Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahway, NJ
26.
GrantS.G.High-stakes testing: How are social studies teachers responding?Social Education7152007358–361
27.
HargreavesA.Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age1994Teachers College PressNew York, NY
28.
HindeE.Ready-to-teach: Fractured social studies or integrated thinkers, the end result of curriculum integrationSocial Studies Research Practice432009118–127
29.
LemingJ.S.EllingtonL.SchugM.Social studies in our nation's elementary and middle schools2006The Center of Survey Research and AnalysisHartford, CT
30.
LevstikL.S.BartonK.C.Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools2011RoutledgeNew York, NY
31.
LintnerT.Social studies (still) on the backburner: Perceptions and practices of K-5 social studies instructionJournal of Social Studies Research30120063–8
32.
MilesM.HubermanA.Qualitative data analysis1994SAGEThousand Oaks, CA
33.
PaceJ.Inequalities in history-social science teaching under high stakes accountability: Interviews with fifth-grade teachers in CaliforniaSocial Studies Research and Practice31200824–40
34.
PaceJ.L.The complex and unequal impact of high stakes accountability on untested social studiesTheory and Practice in Social Education391201132–60
35.
PittmanA.RombergT.Teachers’ use of time in a period of changeGándaraP.The dimensions of time and the challenge of school reform2000SUNY pressAlbany, NY135–151
36.
Rock, T. C., Heafner, T. L., Oldendorf, S. B., Passe, J., O'Connor, K., Good, A. J., & Byrd, S. P. (2006). One state closer to a national crises: A report on elementary social studies in North Carolina schools. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(4), 455-483.
37.
RoseB.SteinM.ChoosingExamining elementary social studies more school: Extended time policies and student achievement across seasons in charter and traditional public schools2011Society for Research on Educational EffectivenessEvanston, IL
38.
Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
39.
ShentonA.K.Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projectsEducation for Information22200463–75
40.
SilvaE.Off the clock: What more time can (and can't) do for school turnarounds2012Education SectorWashington, D.C
41.
VanSledrightB.The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy2011RoutledgeNew York, NY
42.
WillsJ.S.Putting the squeeze on social studies: Managing teaching dilemmas in subject areas excluded from state testingTeachers College Record10920071980–2046
43.
WillsJ.S.SandholtzJ.Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountabilityTeachers College Record11120091065–1114
44.
WineburgS.Historical thinking and other unnatural acts2001Temple University PressPhiladelphia, PA
45.
YinR.K.Case study research methods: Design and methods2003SageThousand Oaks, CA
46.
ZhaoY.HogeJ.D.What elementary students and teachers say about social studiesThe Social Studies962005216–221
