U.S. history state assessments,discourse demands,and English Learners’ achievement: Evidence for the importance of reading and writing instruction in U.S. history for English Learners ⋆
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2018
U.S. history state assessments,discourse demands,and English Learners’ achievement: Evidence for the importance of reading and writing instruction in U.S. history for English Learners ⋆
States are beginning to restructure their U.S. history assessments from previous multiple-choice based assessments to include written-response questions that have higher levels of academic language demands. These higher-order thinking and analytical items pose challenges to linguistically and culturally diverse students. The purpose of the current study is to investigate how the restructuring of a U.S. history state assessment is associated with English Learners’ (ELs) achievement over time. The author incorporates 3 years of data from the Tennessee Department of Education, and utilizes multi-level modeling (Hierarchical Linear Modeling) to examine and compare the association between school percentage ELs and U.S. history achievement on Tennessee's (TN) U.S. history state assessment. Findings indicate that the restructuring of the TN U.S. history state assessment in the 2015–16 school year is significantly and inversely associated with ELs’ achievement on this assessment. At the same time, there are no significant associations for the 2012–13 and the 2013–14 school years. This suggests a negative inverse association between the restructuring of the TN U.S. history state assessment and ELs’ performance. In addition, this suggests that ELs’ lack of U.S. history reading and writing ability may have contributed to the negative association.
Abedi, J., & Dietal, R. (2004). Challenges in the no child left behind act for english language learners. CRESST Policy Brief 7. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2.
AbediJ.GándaraP.Performance of English language learners as a subgroup in large‐scale assessment: Interaction of research and policyEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice254200636–46
3.
Abedi, J., Leon, S., Mirocha, J. (2005). Examining ELL and non-ELL student performance differences and their relationship to background factors: continued analyses of extant data. In (CSE Report 663). In The validity of administering large- scale content assessments to English language learners: An investigation from three perspectives (pp. 1–46). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Retrieved from 〈http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492891.pdf〉.
4.
AnziaS.F.MoeT.M.Collective bargaining, transfer rights, and disadvantaged schoolsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis361201483–111
5.
Bailey, A. (2005). Language analysis of standardized achievement tests: considerations in the assessment of English language learners. In (CSE Report 663) The validity of administering large- scale content assessments to English language learners: An investigation from three perspectives (pp. 79–100). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Retrieved from 〈http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492891.pdf〉.
6.
BartonK.C.LevstikL.S.Teaching history for the common good2004RoutledgeNew York, NY
7.
BourdieuP.Cultural reproduction and social reproductionBrownR.Knowledge, education and cultural change1973TavistockLondon71–112
8.
BourdieuP.The forms of capitalRichardsonJ.Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education1986Greenwood PressNew York, NY241–258
9.
BunchG.C.KiblerA.PimentelS.Realizing opportunities for English learners in the common core English language arts and disciplinary literacy standards2012Understanding Language InitiativeStanford, CA(Retrieved June 28, 2017)
10.
BurroughsS.GroceE.WebeckM.L.Social studies education in the age of testing and accountabilityEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice243200513–20
11.
Butler, F. A., & Castellon-Wellington, M. (2005). Students’ concurrent performance on tests of English language proficiency and academic achievement. In (CSE Report 663) The validity of administering large-scale content assessments to English language learners: An investigation from three perspectives (pp. 47–78). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Retrieved from 〈http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492891.pdf〉.
ChoiY.LimJ.H.AnS.Marginalized students’ uneasy learning: Korean immigrant students’ experiences of learning social studiesSocial Studies Research Practice6320111–17
14.
Common Core Standards Initiative (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from 〈http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf〉.
15.
DeWittS.W.PattersonN.BlankenshipW.BlevinsB.DiCamilloL.GerwinD.SullivanC.C.The lower-order expectations of high-stakes tests: A four-state analysis of social studies standards and test alignmentTheory Research in Social Education4132013382–427
16.
EpsteinT.L.Adolescents’ perspectives on racial diversity in U.S. history: Case studies from an urban classroomAmerican Educational Research Journal372000185–214
17.
EpsteinT.L.Interpreting national history: Race, identity, and pedagogy in classroom and communities2009RoutledgeNew York, NY
18.
EscamillaK.MahonE.Riley-BernalH.RutledgeD.High-states testing, Latinos, and English language learners: Lessons from ColoradoBilingual Research Journal271200325–49
19.
FitchettP.G.HeafnerT.L.Making critical connections between social studies teaching and student achievement using NAEP data explorerTeacher Educator4842013296–310
20.
FitchettP.G.HeafnerT.L.LambertR.G.Assessment, autonomy, and elementary social studies timeTeachers College Record1161020141–34
21.
FitchettP.G.HeafnerT.L.LambertR.G.Examining social studies marginalization: A multilevel modelEducational Policy281201440–68
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ.A.Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English language learners2010Teachers College PressNew York, NY
24.
GrantS.G.High-stakes testing: How are social studies teachers responding?Social Education7152007250–255
25.
GrantS.G.SalinasC.Assessment and accountability in the social studiesLevstickL.S.TysonC.A.Handbook of research in social studies education2008Taylor and FrancisNew York, NY219–239
26.
HeafnerT.L.FitchettP.G.An opportunity to learn US history: What NAEP data suggest regarding the opportunity gapThe High School Journal9832015226–249
27.
HeafnerT.L.FitchettP.G.KnowlesR.T.Using big data, large-scale studies, secondary datasets, and secondary data analysis as tools to inform social studies teaching and learningCrowA.R.CuencaA.Rethinking Social Studies Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century2016Springer International PublishingSwitzerland359–38310.1007/978-3-319-22939-3_19
HeiligJ.V.Understanding the interaction between high-stakes graduation tests and English LearnersTeachers College Record1131220112633–2669
30.
HongW.P.YoungsP.Does high-stakes testing increase cultural capital among low-income and racial minority students?Educational Policy Analysis Archives1662008 〈http://eppa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n6/〉
31.
KaneT.J.TaylorE.S.TylerJ.H.WootenA.L.Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement dataThe Journal of Human Resources4632010587–613
KonstantopoulosS.BormanG.Family background and school effects on student achievement: A multilevel analysis of the Coleman dataTeachers College Record1131201197–132
34.
LappM.S.GriggW.S.Tay-LimB.S.The nation's report card: U.S. history 2001, NECS 2002-4832002U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational StatisticsWashington, DC
35.
LevyS.A.Heritage, history, and identityTeachers College Record116620141–34
36.
LinnR.L.Assessments and accountabilityEducational Researcher29220004–16
37.
LintnerT.Social studies (still) on the back burner: Perceptions and practices of K-5 social studies instructionJournal of Social Studies Research30120063–8
38.
ManzoK.K.Social studies losing out to reading, mathEducation Week242720051–17
McGuinnP.Stimulating reform: Race to the top, competitive grants and the Obama education agendaEducational Policy2612012136–159
41.
MenkenK.English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy2008Multilingual Matters LtdTonawanda, NY
42.
MenkenK.NCLB and English language learners: Challenges and consequencesTheory Into Practice4922010121–128
43.
MuellerR.G.ColleyL.M.An evaluation of the impact of end-of-course exams and ACT-QualityCore on US history instruction in a Kentucky high schoolThe Journal of Social Studies Research392201595–106
44.
National Center for Education StatisticsThe nation's report card: U.S. History 20142016U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational StatisticsWashington, DC
45.
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS)The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history2013NCSSSilver Spring, MD
46.
NiemiR.G.JunnJ.Civic education: What makes students learn2005Yale University PressChelsea, MI
OlneckM.Can multicultural education change what counts as cultural capital?American Educational Research Journal3722000317–348
52.
PeckC.L.“It's not like [I'm] Chinese and Canadian. I am in between”: Ethnicity and students’ conceptions of historical significanceTheory Research in Social Education382010574–617
53.
PhillipsV.WongC.Teaching to the common core by design, not accidentPhi Delta Kappan937201231–37
54.
PlunkA.D.TateW.F.BierutL.J.GruczaR.A.Intended and unintended effects of state-mandated high school science and mathematics course graduation requirements on educational attainmentEducational Researcher4352014230–241
55.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methodssecond ed.2002SageThousand Oaks, CA
56.
ReismanA.The difficulty of assessing disciplinary historical readingErcikanK.SeixasP.New directions In assessing historical thinking2015RoutledgeNew York, NY29–40
57.
Rios-AguilarC.CanchéM.S.G.SabetghadamS.Evaluating the impact of restrictive language policies: The Arizona 4-hour English language development blockLanguage Policy111201247–80
58.
RockT.HeafnerT.OldendorfS.PasseJ.O'ConnorK.GoodA.ByrdS.One state closer to a national crisis: A report on elementary social studies in North Carolina schoolsTheory and Research in Social Education3442006455–483
59.
SalinasC.Teaching in a high-stakes testing setting: What becomes of teacher knowledge?GrantS.G.Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States2006Information Age PublishingGreenwich, CT177–193
60.
SayeJ.Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative (SSIRC)Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated testsTheory Research in Social Education411201389–132
61.
ScarcellaR.RumbergerR.W.Academic English key to long term success in schoolUC Linguistic Minority Research Institute Newsletter920001–2
62.
SmithJ.NiemiR.G.Learning history in school: The impact of course work and instructional practices on achievementTheory Research in Social Education291200118–42
63.
Solano-FloresG.TrumballE.Examining language in context: The need for new research paradigms in the testing of English-language learnersEducational Researcher32220033–13
Torney-PurtaJ.AmadeoJ.A.The contributions of international large-scale studies in civic education and engagementvon DavierM.GonzalezE.KirschI.YamamotoK.The role of international large scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research2012SpringerDordrecht, The Netherlands87–114
75.
Torney-PurtaJ.RichardsonW.K.Teaching for the meaningful practice of democratic citizenship: Learning from the IEA civic education study in 28 countriesPatrickJ.J.HamotG.E.LemingR.S.Civic learning in teacher education: International perspectives on education for democracy in the preparation of teachers22003ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science EducationBloomington, IN25–44
76.
U.S. Department of Education (2006). Consolidated state performance report: Parts 1 and II: Elementary and secondary education as amended by the no child left behind act of 2001. Washington, DC. Retrieved from 〈https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/sy05-06/tn.pdf〉.
ValenzuelaA.Leaving children behind: How “Texas-Style” accountability fails Latino youth2005State University of New York PressAlbany, NY
79.
Van HoverS.D.Teaching history in the old dominion: The impact of Virginia's accountability reform on seven secondary beginning history teachersGrantS.G.Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States2006Information Age PublishingGreenwich, CT195–219
80.
VoglerK.The impact of a high school graduation examination on Mississippi social studies teachers’ instructional practicesGrantS.G.Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States2006Information Age PublishingGreenwich, CT273–302
81.
WillsJ.S.Putting the squeeze on the social studies: Managing teaching dilemmas in subject areas excluded from state testingTeachers College Record109820071980–2046
